similar to: Standalone server and POSIX ACL issues (new one)

Le 09/08/2019 ? 21:36, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 09/08/2019 20:18, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> For testing purpose, I am running a standalone Samba 4.9.5 on Debian >> with the following smb.conf: >> >> [global] >> server role = standalone server >> map to guest = Bad User >> guest account = nobody > That

Hi, First, thanks for all people that continuously giving great advice on this list! I am setting up a standalone server (Debian 10, Samba 4.9.5+dfsg-5 from Debian). The following directory is shared and contains two directories: /home/eleve/partage/ ??? Documents ??? Travail I want user "eleve" to be able to modify everything, and guest users to have read access on

Le 10/07/2019 ? 08:46, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 09/07/2019 22:49, Yvan Masson wrote: >> Le 09/07/2019 ? 21:16, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>> On 09/07/2019 20:06, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> First, thanks for all people that continuously giving great advice >>>> on this list!

Le 10/07/2019 ? 12:33, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 10/07/2019 10:37, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> >> OK thanks. However I still want to clarify what is wrong with my >> original setup, where "Partage" directory is shared on a standalone >> Samba 4.9.5 server: >> /home/yvan/Partage/ >> ??? Consultation/ >> ??? Echange/ >

Le 10/07/2019 ? 14:28, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 10/07/2019 13:16, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> >> >> Le 10/07/2019 ? 12:33, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>> On 10/07/2019 10:37, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> OK thanks. However I still want to clarify what is wrong with my >>>> original setup, where

Le 09/08/2019 ? 22:34, Yvan Masson via samba a ?crit?: > > > Le 09/08/2019 ? 21:36, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >> On 09/08/2019 20:18, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>> Hi list, >>> >>> For testing purpose, I am running a standalone Samba 4.9.5 on Debian >>> with the following smb.conf: >>> >>> [global] >>>

On 8/9/19 3:18 PM, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi list, > > For testing purpose, I am running a standalone Samba 4.9.5 on Debian > with the following smb.conf: > > [global] > server role = standalone server > map to guest = Bad User > guest account = nobody > > [test] > path = /home/yvan/Partage/share > guest ok = yes > writable = yes > inherit acls

> So to sum up, setting ACL for the guest user is not enough for Samba, > while it works for other users. It does not depend on which Unix user is > used as guest. > > I just found a very strange workaround: the right needs to be given to > the primary group and not the user. For example, if my guest user is > "nobody", then I would give rights to group

Shanks for the hint! Very strange that the default is only to use a deprecated protocol… Anyway, this option has no effect on this issue… Yvan Le 31/05/2019 à 18:53, Kris Lou via samba a écrit : > Most likely, your Windows 10 (file server) is disallowing SMB1 connections, > which is the default for smbclient. > > You can force smbclient to use a higher protocol with "smbclient

On 12/08/2019 12:11, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> So to sum up, setting ACL for the guest user is not enough for Samba, >> while it works for other users. It does not depend on which Unix user >> is used as guest. >> >> I just found a very strange workaround: the right needs to be given >> to the primary group and not the user. For example, if my guest

On 09/07/2019 22:49, Yvan Masson wrote: > Le 09/07/2019 ? 21:16, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >> On 09/07/2019 20:06, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> First, thanks for all people that continuously giving great advice >>> on this list! >>> >>> I am setting up a standalone server (Debian 10, Samba 4.9.5+dfsg-5

> That is what I did. But it fails even when mounting manually: > 1. Connect on the desktop using domain user "yvan.masson" (either > graphically / TTY / SSH). Kerberos ticket is properly created. > 2. Running "sudo mount -t cifs //ad.FOO.BAR.LOCAL/Echange /mnt -o > user=yvan.masson,cruid=yvan.masson,sec=krb5" fails with "Required key > not

Le 10/03/2020 ? 11:21, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 10/03/2020 10:10, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Le 10/03/2020 ? 10:37, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>> On 10/03/2020 09:18, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>>> If think I did not properly explain my setup, sorry for that: Samba >>>> here is not sharing anything. It is just used for

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 7:00:06 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:31:33PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello Jeremy, >> Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> >> Hello Jeremy, >> >> > Do alice and bob have the same user ids on client

Le 10/03/2020 ? 10:37, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 10/03/2020 09:18, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> If think I did not properly explain my setup, sorry for that: Samba >> here is not sharing anything. It is just used for joining a Windows >> domain, so that users can sit on a chair in front of this Debian >> computer, use their domain credentials in

Hi all, Sorry for this question which has certainely already been answered, but I could not find info in the list nor in the wiki. From my Debian laptop running testing (samba 4.9.5) and with an empty smb.conf (I wanted to be sure that only default values are used), I can not browse shares of a Windows 10 machine (sorry, Thunderbird splits some lines): smbclient -L 192.168.122.200 Unable to

Hello, After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something wrong. Please see the setup below and point to what I am doing wrong.

Hi list, I joined a workstation (Debian 10, Samba from distribution) to our AD domain (Windows 2012 Server). The domain ends by ".local" (yes I know, not my fault). However, after a domain user logged to the machine, I can't mount a share that exists on the AD server using user's kerberos ticket: it fails with error "Required key not available". Mounting using

Le 09/03/2020 ? 16:43, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 09/03/2020 15:18, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Thanks for your help! >> >> Le 09/03/2020 ? 15:39, L.P.H. van Belle via samba a ?crit?: >>> Did you "deleated the computer object" to allow kerberos services. >>> And did you add the CIFS/spn to the computer and keytab ? >>>

After re-join kinit Administrator net ads keytab add cifs/$(hostname -f) -k net ads keytab add_update_ads -k samba-tool delegation for-any-service COMPUTERNAME$ on ( or use : delegation add-service accountname principal [options] ) Reboot Should work now. ;-) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Yvan