similar to: [Bug] Cannot create file but read/write is ok

On 08/08/2019 05:32, lampahome via samba wrote: > I don't know why I can't register bugzilla so I post here. > > I have two ubuntu 16.04 machine A, B, and A install samba version 4.10.6, > and B install version 4.3.11. > I use samba-vfs in machine A. > > I mount share of A in B ex: > sudo mount -t cifs -o username='ppp',password='admin' //IP/public

> > > First, this is useless: 'public = yes' (which is really 'guest ok = > yes') for two reasons, you also have 'valid users = ppp', so only 'ppp' > can connect, but even if that wasn't there, it wouldn't allow guest > access because you do not have 'map to guest = bad user' in [global]. > > As for '%g', have you

> > > That doesn't show the users primary group, you need the output of > 'getent passwd ppp' > > getent passwd ppp ppp:x:1000:1000:ppp,,,:/home/ppp:/bin/bash

> > It is a possibility that your users primary group doesn't exist on the > computer where you are mounting from. > > It also might help if you say what your clients are, the users primary > group only really makes sense from a Windows machine, where it should be > 'Domain Users' (if a domain joined computer), or 'Users' if not. From a > Unix client,

Hello, My apologies for my bad english, this is not my birth langage and I'm still learning it. I'm trying to configure a Samba server to simply use LDAP backend for authenticate users. Just that, I don't care of PDC/BDC, etc.The samba schema is present in the LDAP, and in the users profile. The samba server have the same SID as the domain. I can log to my samba server using LDAP

On 5/23/24 22:58, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Can you post your smb.conf. Actually no, as I don't have *one* smb.conf. I'll add three of them (the last three were I had this problem) at the end of this email. As you can see they are not exactly identical. > Have you used any of our fallback VFS modules instead of xattrs? I'd say not, but see the smb.confs. > (This would

Hi Rowland, Thanks for taking the time to look at this. I will post the log 10 output a bit later. Btw, what logs with log level 10 are you interested in? Here’s my samba config with sensitive info replaced with placeholders: [global] access based share enum = yes browseable = yes comment = <COMMENT> create mask = 0660 directory mask =

Good morning list, is there a failure in that manpage? (I'm running Samba version 4.17.6-Debian) The example shows: [records] path = /data/records vfs objects = full_audit full_audit:prefix = %u|%I full_audit:success = open opendir full_audit:failure = all !open full_audit:facility = LOCAL7 full_audit:priority = ALERT But: - opendir is not shown within complete set of Samba VFS operations.

i have setup a samba server as a AD member. AD: 2012R2 The first day everything was working fine. After restart the Samba Service i had no access to my shares. getent passwd and getent group deliver the UID and GID : 4294967295:4294967295: by all AD Users which is -1 (FFFF FFFF) wbinfo -n user deliver S-1-5-21-4001112740-1724199908-163113746-1106 SID_USER (1) which is correct ! I get from

> > > and clean my glasses ;-) > > I totally misread '%U:%g@%I' > > %U session username > > %g primary group name of %u. > > Notice the difference in case of '%U' & '%u' > > Try '%G' instead, this is the primary group name of %U. > > I fix it to %U|%G|%I still failed. It always shows input/output

Hello All, now that the BUG 14343: (s3: vfs_full_audit: Add missing fcntl entry in vfs_op_names[] array.) was fixed I wanted to try 4.12 again. This is the relevant config which has been running for years: vfs objects = acl_xattr full_audit shadow_copy2 full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = pwrite write rename unlink full_audit:prefix = IP=%I|USER=%u|MACHINE=%m|VOLUME=%S

> On 02.11.2015, at 16:25, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Well he didn't write what I asked for, can you please post your entire smb.conf, please do not use testparm, please post as is (although you can sanitise any sensitive info) Sorry, missed that part. Here we go. Regards, Thomas [global] available = yes smb2 leases = yes

Hello, i've seen this error on the mailing list but no solutions. Problem: No user can execute an .exe file from a group share under any windows version (wXP til Windows 7). Permisions: Every user can read, write, delete, etc in that share. I've chmoded 777 the file but for nothing. The user can copy the .exe file to another location like desktop and then can execute it (is a portable

Hello Experts, I am trying to migrate a Samba 3.6 server to Samba 4.19. The OS of the old server is FreeBSD 10.3 and the new one is FreeBSD 14.1. The client computers are Win 10 Pro. Simple Samba configuration, no need for Active Directory, just a file server with user authentication. On the Windows computer I try to mount the shares from the new server as \\[new server IP address]. The log

On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:20:44 -0400 samba3to4 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Experts, > > I am trying to migrate a Samba 3.6 server to Samba 4.19. > > [...] > > The log file shows that the user can authenticate: > > [2024/10/07 23:27:24.974539, 2] ../../source3/auth/auth.c: > 338(auth_check_ntlm_password) check_ntlm_password:

On Fri, 11 May 2018 09:14:24 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > You would replace 'FACILITY' with one of the facilities shown in > > 'man syslog' e.g. full_audit:facility = LOG_AUTH > > OK, done. But samba (as stated in previous email) still reply:

Hello, I am running a Samba 4 DC, recently upgraded to the latest version and I have just installed a member server to run as a File Server (Samba 4.1.9). While it seems to be working properly, we are getting a lot of zombie nmbd processes on the member server, running the command *pidof nmbd* results in: *[root at BHFS01 etc]# pidof nmbd* *12861 12644 12404 12236 12071 11885 11720 11553 11388

Good day All I am re proposing this topic as it keeps happening in our enviroment and is creating some trouble now. I have 1 samba file share server, and a different samba4 AD server. the file server has been recently updated to Ubuntu 14 and its native samba 4.1.6. The samba4 AD is on Ubuntu 14 and on sernet-samba 4.2.2. what happens is that every 4~5 days the file share server loses randomly

Hi, first of all i'm sorry for my english. i'm using sernet packages to keep updated my file server, but after the latest update it becames very slow listing and accesing to files... For example, a thunderbird profile from networks takes about 1 minute to load. Now the profile takes about 20 minutes and the program still loading... I've not changed any configuration on server and i

Hello, I run samba 3.6 and I need to track problems for dedicated users. So I thought, I load at the end via include special configurations for the user separately. My question is, how does the smbd configure itself. Does smbd 1) reads the config completely and then it set the parameters in the process or 2) does smbd reads and set each parameter instantly? So can I use the following example?