similar to: Migrate from 3.5.21 or start anew?

Hi there. [I just asked this over the irc channel, but since I got no reply, I decided to cross-post here. Please forgive me if that is incorrect] I'm trying to migrate an Active Directory domain (that is being used only for authentication) to a samba3 domain. The network is small enough to rejoin the clients one by one and recreate the user accounts if necessary. However, the new user

On Thu Dec 14 19:27:29 2023 Matt Savin <matt at tegers.com> wrote: > > Hello Mark, > > When joining the domain, did you specify domain name as hprs.locl, or hprs > only? Please try to specify hprs.locl. > > BR, > Matt Matt - yes I did specify hprs.locl. I just tried it again and it failed again. This time I opened the "Detail" box which says:

I hope someone here can offer an easy approach to the following (somewhat simplified) scenario. We have a Samba domain that is running well. We have 10 Samba/CUPS printers and used the Windows Print Wizard method noted on pages 225-226 (section 17.6.1) of the Prentice-Hall-published Official Samba-3 HOWTO to install the drivers. Over time, we learned to pay particular attention the the printer

On 11.01.2016 20:37, Rowland penny wrote: > On 11/01/16 19:26, Jean-Philippe Steinmetz wrote: >> Yes I have provisioned the samba server as an Active Directory domain >> controller (I mentioned that in the first e-mail). >> >> The reason for linking the two is to provide easy access to >> additional MS >> services that won't be hosted internally (e.g.

[cross-posted from www.tek-tips.com] Dear samba forum, I've now wasted most of a weekend on this issue, so now it's time to swallow my pride and ask for help! Background: My main home computer died. I can't afford to replace it right now, so I'm attempting to retread an old AMD PC into a linux print/file server. Clients are a mixed bag of Windows XP home/professional PCs. The

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 24 mei 2017 12:38 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] classic upgrade, splitting servers > > Am 2017-05-24 um 12:23 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > > Ok, lets start with : > >>

I tried the Louis Van Belle's Debian backport of Samba 4.4.5 and I observed one obscure behaviour. I am running it on Debian 8.6.0.  I just run Samba as a NT4 PDC and do simple file sharing.  When my server is rebooted, my PCs cannot see the domain.  Everything seems fine when I checked the status of the Samba using "/etc/init.d/samba status".  However once I restart Samba

In a related problem. I've tried linking my Office365 account. I get through the sign-in process but when it is attempting to link the device I can an error message stating: *We weren't able to register your device and add your account to Windows. Your access to org resources may be limited.* The domain account I am logged in with is part of the Domain Admins group so I don't think

Hey All: I've got a working samba/ldap domain with a PDC in a datacenter and a BDC in my local office. I'm not able to reliably join a windows XP Pro machine to the domain by specifying the PDC as a wins server. I get the following error 90% of the time or more, with no discernible patterns or errors in any logs: --------------------------------- The following error occurred attempting

> You missed that using a DC as a fileserver isn't recommended. It was between the lines of "I followed all the guidelines for doing things correctly in this specific situation" :) > From reading the samba log, it looks like Samba logons are not working, > but ldap connections are. This means Win clients are logging in via LDAP? Can this be related to the inaccessible

Hi guys I'm wondering if anyone here is using the GlusterFS OCF resource agents with Pacemaker on CentOS 7? yum install centos-release-gluster yum install glusterfs-server glusterfs-resource-agents The reason I ask is that there seem to be a few problems with them on 3.10, but these problems are so severe that I'm struggling to believe I'm not just doing something wrong. I created

Colleagues, We're in the process of standardizing on Sprint PCS and Cingular phones on a national basis (~ 50 properties, 1000's of lines). I manage an Asterisk install at one location. I've been looking at the Multitech CellFinder CDMA for Sprint as a dial backup solution. Basically, it's a CDMA to POTS gateway, tied to a PCS account. We would see it as a trunk line and I

Following from the R-help thread of March 22 on "Memory usage in prcomp", I've started looking into adding an optional 'rank.' argument to prcomp allowing to more efficiently get only a few PCs instead of the full p PCs, say when p = 1000 and you know you only want 5 PCs. (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2016-March/437228.html As it was mentioned, we already

Dear R users, I have 2 SpatialPointsDataFrame's, pcs and East. The column str_1 in the first (pcs) is: > pcs[0:4,] coordinates cat str_1 int_1 int_2 dbl_1 dbl_2 1 (101000, 263000) 1 "SM06B" 101000 263000 4.978915 -4.293668 2 (101000, 265000) 2 "SM06C" 101000 265000 4.960478 -4.266742 3 (101000, 267000) 3 "SM06D" 101000 267000

Hi, Can u please explain for what purpose pacemaker cluster used here? Regards, Jiffin On Thursday 07 December 2017 06:59 PM, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote: > > Hi guys > > I'm wondering if anyone here is using the GlusterFS OCF resource > agents with Pacemaker on CentOS 7? > > yum install centos-release-gluster > yum install glusterfs-server

> On 25 Mar 2016, at 10:41 am, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > As I see it, the display showing the first p << n PCs adding up to 100% of the variance is plainly wrong. > > I suspect it comes about via a mental short-circuit: If we try to control p using a tolerance, then that amounts to saying that the remaining PCs are effectively zero-variance, but

I agree with Kasper, this is a 'big' issue. Does your method of taking only n PCs reduce the load on memory? The new addition to the summary looks like a good idea, but Proportion of Variance as you describe it may be confusing to new users. Am I correct in saying Proportion of variance describes the amount of variance with respect to the number of components the user chooses to show? So

We're beginning to test MultiTech's CallFinder CDMA Units, one for Sprint PCS and one for Alltel. They sell both. Our intent is to use them as a backup line for our main office (which has a PRI) and a backup/911 line for our remote offices which are all connected via * over a VPN with no local trunks at any of them. In the interest of maximizing use of the lines, I'm putting

I am new in linux world,basically I''m using red hat 9 kernel 2.4.20-8. I need to build a trusted gateway. my linux box will be the gateway for several machine PCs to go to the desired server. there will be several subnets under the linux box, I''ve already assigned static IPs for the PCs . Now my problem is I only need 2 PCs from each subnets to connect to certain servers, and

Hi all, We are running Samba 3.0.2a and using it as a domain controller and WINS server. After rebooting the server, we are unable to reach (i.e. looking up machines by name) some of our network PCs (Windows 2000 boxes), due to failure with WINS look up. I investigated the wins.db file, and those Win boxes are not listed in there. If I use the command "nbtstat -RR" on those PCs to