similar to: Permissions not inherited when moving a file

On 06/08/2019 14:22, S?ren Busse via samba wrote: > Hello Samba list subscribers, > > i have a permission issue when moving files or directories (rename > syscall) between directories with different permissions in my share. > I'm using POSIX ACLs on my shares. > > These are my users: > user.one (uid: 101111, gid: 101111) > SAMDOM\Domain Users (gid: 100513) > >

On 06/08/2019 15:02, S?ren Busse via samba wrote: > Thank you very much for your reply. > > Oh sorry, I forgot that: > Here's my smb.conf for Samba 4.9.4-Debian fileserver. I'm running > samba with a different Samba-DC (i replaced my domain with samdom): > > [global] > security = ADS > workgroup = samdom > realm = samdom.domain.tld > log file =

Hello Samba list subscribers, i have a permission issue when moving files or directories (rename syscall) between directories with different permissions in my share. I'm using POSIX ACLs on my shares. These are my users: user.one (uid: 101111, gid: 101111) SAMDOM\Domain Users (gid: 100513) I've got the following directories: This is the private (home) directory of user.one. The user

Thank you very much for your reply. Beside the fact that we can't use Windows ACLs because we need the posix acls for a different service, are you sure, that Windows ACLs would fix this issue? The ntacls are stored in the xattr of the file itself. When you now move the file to a different location the xattr should stay the same and the user still doesn't have the right permissions to

Thank you very much for your reply. Oh sorry, I forgot that: Here's my smb.conf for Samba 4.9.4-Debian fileserver. I'm running samba with a different Samba-DC (i replaced my domain with samdom): [global] security = ADS workgroup = samdom realm = samdom.domain.tld log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 1 idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 idmap config

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14262 Bug ID: 14262 Summary: add continuous sync mode using inotify/fanotify/etc Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net

Hi! We're using sernet-samba 3.0.28-21 on debian. (The smb.conf can be found below) There are 2 subfolders in root share directory "ponudbe" and "projects": srv03:/srv/data/test# getfacl * # file: ponudbe # owner: root # group: root user::rwx user:COMPANY+administrator:rwx group::r-x group:COMPANY+ponudbe_rw:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx

Hi, I have a problem with the removal of inheritance ACLs of subdirectories. It almost sounds like only adding ACLs work but removals of inheritance ACL's not. By default the access rights (including ACLs) should be inherited, but it should also be possible to remove the access rights from any subdirectory. This is what I am trying to do, I have a share called media with some users /

Hi, I have a problem with the inheritance of ACLs, respectively the removal of the inherited ACLs in subdirectories. The following szenario: By default the access rights (including ACLs) should be inherited, but it should also be possible to remove the access rights from any subdirectory. Therefore I've set up the following configuration: [Finanzen] path = /shares/finanzen msdfs root =

Hi, I'd like to inherit the permissions of a parent folder to file/folder that is moved into it. Just like if you copy it. Since the Windows default behaviour is different, i tried to find out how to change it. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310316/en-us Describes a registry setting to fix my issue. Sadly this doesn't work for windows 7. After some googling i found a hotfix by

Hi Samba team, I'm currently building a Samba Domaincontroller with a seperate domain joined Samba Fileserver in my environment. On my fileserver share which root directory is /srv/Share I don't use Windows ACLs, so just the default Linux permissions and Posix ACLs Let's assume that I've a group employees which should have rwx permissions to a group specific share. So I've

> Has someone experience with collecting the changed files > with a third party tool which detects which files were changed? I don't know of sysdig but am the developer of Lsyncd which does exactly that, collect file changes via inotify event mechanism and then calls rsync with a matching filter mask. However, since you say, your directory tree is hugh, the main issue is that for every

hi If i create a new file x.txt, samba sets the permission of the group users to rwx. "inherit acls" is set to yes. Why samba sets the permission to rwx instead of rw (the default permission of the parent) ? New file: getfacl --tabular x.txt # file: x.txt USER xxxxx rw- GROUP users rwx group leiters rwx mask rwx other --- Parent directory:

Hi, I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1, testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only created with 660 permissions. Here are the ACL's of testshare: # file: testshare # owner: ralfgro # group: ve user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup1:rwx group:testgroup2:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::---

Hello I'm running Debian Etch with distro kernel & Samba package (2.6.18-5-686 & 3.0.24-6etch9). In my smb.conf I have : inherit owner = yes inherit permissions = yes inherit acls = yes I start with a dir test1 with no rights for group smb-Users, rx for group smb-Inf, and rwx for group smb-Bme-Fr : root@samba1:/mnt/temp # ll total 28 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2008-01-04

On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > > On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>>> I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a

I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact earlier version) - and since then I just haven't managed to pin down the file permissions and inheritance on the shares as it's been constantly causing issues. This server is both a file server and a AD DC. The current problem I am facing is the permissions of the

Hello dear list members I am not an experienced user of Samba, so I can be committing some basic mistake, but it seems to me that there is something wrong with the way Samba propagates ACLs. I tried versions 3.0.32 and 3.2.4 and the result is the same. This happens with "map acl inherit = yes" on smb.conf. I have a directory (dir) with the following ACLs: # file: dir USER Admin

On 11/06/19 14:54, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > > On 11/06/19 13:29, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny

Look at the acl(5) man page and you'll see that the ACCESS CHECK ALGORITH starts: IF the effective user ID of the process matches the user ID of the file object owner ... ELSE IF the effective user ID of the process matches the qualifier of any entry of type ACL_USER, THEN IF the matching ACL_USER entry and the ACL_MASK entry contain the requested permissions, access is