similar to: Syncing Sysvol

On 16/07/2019 16:40, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:32 AM Rowland penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> On 16/07/2019 14:16, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:11 AM Rowland penny via samba >>> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>> On 16/07/2019 14:02, Jonathon Reinhart wrote:

Listening to notifications can only complement another mechanism (and then reduce latency) as otherwise you are going to loose changes during downtimes. Joachim -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Jonathon Reinhart via samba Gesendet: Tuesday, 16 July 2019 22:22 An: Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> Cc: sambalist <samba

Hi, in this thread: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-July/224365.html Joachim Lindenberg reminded me that he was using smbclient to sync Sysvol. He posted (in the link above) a link to his original post: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-July/224346.html Here he posted a copy of his script. I personally would never have thought about using smbclient, but it just goes to

On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:32 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 16/07/2019 16:40, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:32 AM Rowland penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On 16/07/2019 14:16, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:11 AM Rowland penny via

On 16/07/2019 14:16, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:11 AM Rowland penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> On 16/07/2019 14:02, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: >>> Rowland, >>> >>> You could go another step further and run that with "notify" to >>> monitor for changes, instead of having to run it in a cron

On 16/07/2019 14:02, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > Rowland, > > You could go another step further and run that with "notify" to > monitor for changes, instead of having to run it in a cron job. In my > experience, "notify" works using smbclient, but not so with > libsmbclient. Problem is, the script is written to be run on DC's that do not hold the PDC

Rowland, You could go another step further and run that with "notify" to monitor for changes, instead of having to run it in a cron job. In my experience, "notify" works using smbclient, but not so with libsmbclient. Another nice benefit of using smbclient + 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset' over rsync is that you don't need worry about the built-in user/group ID

On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:32 AM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 16/07/2019 14:16, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:11 AM Rowland penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On 16/07/2019 14:02, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > >>> Rowland, > >>> > >>> You could

>> Yes, but that still uses rsync ;-) >Is this problematic? I have been using this solution for years, with >very good results. Rsync without ssh is insecure. I?d definitely urge to discourage rsync without ssh on wiki.samba.org. And with ssh, rsync is imho a lot more cumbersome to configure across a dynamic landscape. I appreciate the interest. I definitely would like

On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:11 AM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 16/07/2019 14:02, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > > Rowland, > > > > You could go another step further and run that with "notify" to > > monitor for changes, instead of having to run it in a cron job. In my > > experience, "notify" works using

On 17/07/2019 12:03, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019, 02:47 Rowland penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote: > > > > Just trying to get on the same page as you. In my scenario only the > PDC Emulator ("primary") even has a writable Sysvol share; all other > DCs are in effect

On 17/07/2019 13:02, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > I have the [Sysvol] share in smb.conf marked "read only = yes". That > way, if someone connects GPO Editor to a DC other than the PDC > Emulator, it will fail to write the changes, thus enforcing the "GPOs > are only edited on the PDC Emulator DC". This is acceptable in a small > organization; YMMV. If Sysvol is

Thank you. It is clear now, so it was user error and I should read more documentation :) Unfortunately drag and drop isn't working. Is there any prerequisite? My host is FC20 and guest is Win2k8 server Thank you Vlad On Thu 20 Mar 2014 05:42:40 PM CET, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Pal (private)" <vlad@vlad.hu> >>

On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 2:17 PM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 13:45:11 -0400 > Jonathon Reinhart <jonathon.reinhart at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Interesting, I'm getting the same error using the LDB tools: > > > > ONTHEFIVE\jreinhart-admin at samba-dc3:~$ samba-tool user list -H > >

Thanks Reid/Jonathon for your replies. Reid, An important case against module level flags is that it wont allow changing or resetting section names e.g. int a; #pragma clang section bss = "xyz" int b; In case above, users would like to see only 'b' placed in 'xyz' and not 'a' as well. Link pointed to by Jonathon seems to require same behavior.

G'day, I'm trying to build R using the code from SVN. I am able to successfully build the source from here: http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-2/R-2.15.2.tar.gz However, when building the code checked out from SVN (either from 2.15.2 tag, or the trunk) I get the following error: Error: running Sweave on vignette

Hi, I''m having a problem with the automatic formatting of my mysql query. My code is this: Tablename.find(:all, :conditions => {:id => list}) Where list is a list of id''s (8,9,10) The problem is that the query is automatically formatted to this: SELECT * FROM Tablename WHERE (id in (''8,7,9'')) I need this query to run without the extra single quotes

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:52 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 18/12/2019 14:34, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:13 AM Rowland penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote: > > > > Problem is, and as I said, Samba 4.3.x is EOL as far as Samba is >

Interesting, I'm getting the same error using the LDB tools: ONTHEFIVE\jreinhart-admin at samba-dc3:~$ samba-tool user list -H ldap://localhost ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - LDAP error 1 LDAP_OPERATIONS_ERROR - <00002020: Operation unavailable without authentication> <> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 177, in _run return

With a single server, settings "security = server" and "password server = pdc1 pdc2', I can successfully authenticate against two entirely different PDCs depending on which order I put the two machines in the 'password server' list. Is there someway of forcing clients from either domain to authenticate against the 'right' pdc, regardless of the order in the