similar to: Need the ability to edit Samba SIDs.

On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >> I have a Samba problem with eGroupware. Samba 4 is screwing with my >> >> eGroupware UIDs causing Havoc. Samba 4 uses the last four Digits of the >> SID rather than the UID Number. > > If you are running Samba as an AD DC, then Unix UID != RID (what you

On 02/07/2019 13:52, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: > On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>> I have a Samba problem with eGroupware. Samba 4 is screwing with my >>> >>> eGroupware UIDs causing Havoc. Samba 4 uses the last four Digits of the >>> SID rather than the UID

On 02/07/2019 14:40, Zombie Ryushu wrote: > On 07/02/2019 09:32 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 02/07/2019 13:52, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>> On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> >>>> On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>>> I have a Samba problem with eGroupware. Samba 4 is screwing with

On 02/07/2019 15:37, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: > On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 02/07/2019 14:40, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >>> On 07/02/2019 09:32 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 02/07/2019 13:52, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>>> On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>>

On 02/07/2019 15:59, Zombie Ryushu wrote: > On 07/02/2019 10:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 02/07/2019 15:37, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>> On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 02/07/2019 14:40, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >>>>> On 07/02/2019 09:32 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>>> On

On 02/07/2019 16:20, Zombie Ryushu wrote: > On 07/02/2019 11:14 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 02/07/2019 15:59, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >>> On 07/02/2019 10:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 02/07/2019 15:37, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>>> On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>>> On

On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >> I have a Samba problem with eGroupware. Samba 4 is screwing with my >> >> eGroupware UIDs causing Havoc. Samba 4 uses the last four Digits of the >> SID rather than the UID Number. > > If you are running Samba as an AD DC, then Unix UID != RID (what you

On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 14:40, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >> On 07/02/2019 09:32 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 02/07/2019 13:52, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>> On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote:

On 07/02/2019 09:32 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 13:52, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >> On 07/02/2019 06:10 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> >>> On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>> I have a Samba problem with eGroupware. Samba 4 is screwing with my >>>> >>>> eGroupware UIDs causing Havoc.

On 07/02/2019 10:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 15:37, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >> On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 02/07/2019 14:40, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >>>> On 07/02/2019 09:32 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 02/07/2019 13:52, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>>>>

On 07/02/2019 11:14 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/07/2019 15:59, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >> On 07/02/2019 10:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 02/07/2019 15:37, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: >>>> On 07/02/2019 10:17 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 02/07/2019 14:40, Zombie Ryushu wrote: >>>>>> On

On 02/07/2019 10:31, Zombie Ryushu via samba wrote: > I have a Samba problem with eGroupware. Samba 4 is screwing with my > > eGroupware UIDs causing Havoc. Samba 4 uses the last four Digits of the > SID rather than the UID Number. If you are running Samba as an AD DC, then Unix UID != RID (what you are referring to as the 'last four Digits') > I need to know how to

Why only Domain Users and Domain Admins? I can't follow. But a good idea you've had. So a script can possibly be run on every DC the same. I will check and verify. What about built-in objects like system? These are not available in ADUC if my memory doesn't fail now. Will there be a problem when other built-in objects get a rfc gid/uid. E.g. for now wbinfo resolves uid 0 for

The reason why is that simple: the other admin only knows the windows world and that's why it's gonna be risky regarding file services when he creates new users or groups and forgets about the Unix tab. My personal hope is that samba will one day set rfc ids automatically so that these windows guys won't have to care. E.g. it could be an option when provisioning a new domain. It would

Hi, I'm trying to modify the objectSid of a group using python-ldap. I've found that I need a server control to do it but doesn't work. The code that I'm using: modlist = [ (ldap.MOD_REPLACE, 'objectSid', s3sid_packed) ] LDB_CONTROL_PROVISION_OID = "1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.4.3.16" LDB_CONTROL_RELAX_OID = "1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.12"

Hi Timo, Am 18.09.17 um 12:03 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 18 Sep 2017, at 12.10, Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org > <mailto:rb at egroupware.org>> wrote: >> >> Am 14.09.17 um 01:07 schrieb Timo Sirainen: >>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17.42, Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org >>> <mailto:rb at egroupware.org>> wrote: >>>> Dovecot

On 05/12/2019 17:48, S?rgio Basto wrote: > I did migration with something like this : > > ldbsearch -H /opt/samba/private/sam.ldb -s sub -b dc=old_ad,dc=local > '(objectClass=user)' > user-export2.ldif > scp user-export2.ldif to_the_new_machine: > > in new machine : > > sed -i 's/DC=old_ad/DC=corp/g; s/old_ad.local/corp.local/g' user-export2.ldif >

On 05/12/2019 19:08, S?rgio Basto wrote: > I did a new AD with a new name. You get more than a new name > Samba 4.0.0 don't have demote Yes, but you could have upgraded to a version that did. > , I move from a Sernet software to a free > and open software in Centos 7 (I use RedHat flavor since 2001) . How did you manage to provision an AD DC using red-hat packages ? > I just

Hi Timo, update to 2.2.32 (suggested by Aki) did not change the situation ... Am 18.09.17 um 20:49 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 18 Sep 2017, at 20.12, Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org > <mailto:rb at egroupware.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi Timo, >> >> Am 18.09.17 um 12:03 schrieb Timo Sirainen: >>> On 18 Sep 2017, at 12.10, Ralf Becker <rb at

Am 14.09.17 um 01:07 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 7 Sep 2017, at 17.42, Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org> wrote: >> Dovecot 2.2.31 with mailboxes in mdbox format. >> >> Since a couple of days some mailboxes have the problem, that sieve rules >> moving mails to folders stop working and .sieve.log in mailbox shows: >> >> sieve: info: started log at Sep 07