similar to: Share migration

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Share migration"

2019 Jun 18
3
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
On 18/06/2019 19:49, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote: > ?gidNumber for 'Domain Users' is 513 > > not in range? '10000-14999' of uidNumber > > Is it a problem ? Oh yes, ALL user uidNumber's and Domain Users gidNumber MUST be inside the DOMAIN range you set in smb.conf, if they aren't, all your users WILL be ignored by Samba. Find the next available
2019 Jun 19
2
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
Hello, I performed a test in order to get access to my samba share with winbindd (and not sssd). For that, 1. I change the gid of domain users from 513 to 15513 (to match with the domain range 10000 - 14999) And verify my test user is part of 15513 2. Stop sssd and change nsswitch.conf like this : /passwd:???? files winbind// //shadow:???? files// //group:????? files //winbind// / 3.
2019 Jun 18
2
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
Is it possible to make start DOMAIN range from 500 instead of 10000 ? I realized that all my gid are in range 500 to 600 and not in range 10000 - 14999 I thought? DOMAIN range 10000 - 14999 was reserved for DOMAIN users -------- Message transf?r? -------- Sujet?: Re: [Samba] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication Date?: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:25:39 -0300 De?: Edouard Guign? via
2019 Jun 18
3
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
On 18/06/2019 19:02, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I mean that i added "winbind refresh tickets = yes" in smb.cnf, but > does not seem to be link with my problem (Kerberos and NTLMv2 > authentication). > > After several test, without changing content of smb.conf (except for > winbind refresh tickets = yes) : > > 0. nsswitch.conf >
2019 Jun 19
2
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
The 2 commands works : # getent passwd MYDOMAIN\\usertest MYDOMAIN\\usertest:*:10430:14513:user TEST:/home/usertest:/bin/bash # getent group MYDOMAIN\\"Utilisateurs du domaine" MYDOMAIN\utilisateurs du domaine:x:14513: I have to put "Utilisateurs du domaine" instead of Domain\ Users because the Windows AD is a french AD. Le 19/06/2019 ? 12:32, Rowland penny via samba a
2019 Jul 17
2
Name of the share in windows explorer
Hello, My samba share is on a Linux Centos 7, samba version 4.8.3. Please find here is my smb.cnf : [global] ??? security = ads ??? realm = MYDOMAIN.MYDOMAIN.LOCAL ??? workgroup = MYDOMAIN ??? kerberos method = secrets and keytab ??? server signing = mandatory ??? client signing = mandatory ??? hosts allow = 127. 10.x.x. 10.x.x. ??? hosts deny = 10.x.x. 10.x.x. ??? log file =
2019 Jul 17
2
Name of the share in windows explorer
Dear Samba Users, I set 2 samba shares : 1. with the name [groups] /pathtomyshare/groups 2. for each domain users [homes] /home In Windows, I can see with the windows explorer my shares : groups (\\myserver) (V:) mydomainuser (\\myserver\homes) (U:) Why for [groups] is only indicated \\myserver and for [homes] is indicated \\myserver\homes ? Is there a way to change it ? I would only show
2019 Jun 18
7
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
On 18/06/2019 17:24, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote: > "winbind refresh tickets = yes" did not help for my case. > It always has for myself, I have never had to refresh any kerberos machine tickets manually Rowland
2019 Jun 17
2
Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
On 17/06/2019 13:42, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote: > Hello, > > Please find here the content of my smb.cnf : > > [global] > ??????? security = ads > ??????? realm = MYDOMAIN.LOCAL > ??????? workgroup = MYDOMAIN > ??????? kerberos method = secrets and keytab > ??????? server signing = mandatory > ??????? client signing = mandatory > > ??????? hosts allow =
2019 Jun 17
2
Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
On 17/06/2019 12:56, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote: > Hello, > > May you answer me about my issue with kerberos ? > > About libpam-krb5 installed, I have on my system : > yum list krb5-workstation pam_krb5 > krb5-workstation.x86_64 1.15.1-37.el7_6 @updates > pam_krb5.x86_64 2.4.8-6.el7 @base > > Is pam_krb5 equivalent to libpam-krb5 on centos 7 ? Sorry for the late
2019 Jul 22
5
client min protocol = SMB2
I did not set max protocol to SMB2 in smb.cnf, I don't want to force SMB2 selection if SMB3 can be used by a client. The machine is a Windows 7, so is SMB2 compliant. Le 22/07/2019 ? 11:44, Gaiseric Vandal via samba a ?crit?: > I would guess that changing the min protocol does not affect existing > connections unless you were to restart samba. > > Is the max protocol set to at
2019 Jun 19
2
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
So I re run the test with domain users gid 14513 Still not working (sssd stopped, nsswitch.cnf with? "files winbind" for passwd group, # net cache flush + restart winbindd smb) On the samba server : # wbinfo -i MYDOMAIN\usertest MYDOMAIN\usertest:*:10430:*14513*:user TEST:/home/usertest:/bin/bash In log, I have : myw7worstation.log /[2019/06/19 12:04:29.496822,? 1]
2019 Jul 22
3
client min protocol = SMB2
Hello, Thank you ! I add server min protocol = SMB2_02 to smb.cnf All clients are now using SMB2_10 as minimum protocol version May you indicate me the difference between "client min protocol" and "server min protocol" ? "server min protocol" is to use on a domain member "client min protocol" is to use in which case ? Should I also set client min
2019 Jun 20
2
Samba winbind on redhat 7
My idea is to replace default "cifs_idmap_sss.so" plugin by "idmapwb.so" winbind plugin, in order to SSSD becomes a client of winbind. To avoid to change nsswitch.conf : passwd:???? files sss shadow:???? files sss group:????? files sss into passwd:???? files winbind shadow:???? files winbind group:????? files winbind because I need an other access in sftp, this is using
2020 Apr 28
3
Service Winbind stopped, what could be the reason ?
Dear Rowland, Please find a dump of smb.conf and resolv.conf of my centos 7 server : # testparm Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions # Global parameters [global] client min protocol = SMB2 client signing = required disable spoolss = Yes domain
2019 Jun 20
2
Samba winbind on redhat 7
This way is so easier... Thank you Rowland Le 20/06/2019 ? 14:01, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 20/06/2019 17:54, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote: >> My idea is to replace default "cifs_idmap_sss.so" plugin by >> "idmapwb.so" winbind plugin, in order to SSSD becomes a client of >> winbind. >> To avoid to change nsswitch.conf : >>
2019 Jun 18
4
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
Hello, On my system, nssswitch is like this : passwd:???? files sss shadow:???? files sss group:????? files sss So I assumed that it works with SSSD, I do not notice any issue with Samba. My share is accessible, permissions acls are working. The only thing I noticed is maybe NTLMv2 is always used by default with Samba. /[2019/06/18 09:51:44.542476,? 3]
2019 Jun 20
2
Samba winbind on redhat 7
Hello, I am reading RHEL 7 docs concerning samba integration, and I found https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html-single/windows_integration_guide/index#winbind "4.2.4. Switching Between SSSD and Winbind for SMB Share Access This procedure describes how you can switch between SSSD and Winbind plug-ins that are used for accessing SMB shares from SSSD
2019 Jun 18
2
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
On 18/06/2019 16:01, Goetz, Patrick G via samba wrote: > On 6/18/19 8:35 AM, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote: >> I do not want to annoy anymore with my problem of a mixed configuration >> SSSD / Winbindd ; but I would like to understand why this is working >> only with SSSD and not with winbindd. >> Maybe because I first join my linux station to the domain with SSSD ?
2019 Jun 17
3
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
On 17/06/2019 17:45, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I do not know how should be nsswitch.conf configured. > What should I change in it according to "/you either do not have the > passwd, group and shadow lines or you have chosen not to show them/" ? > Something like this? added to nsswitch.conf ? > passwd : files > group : files > shadow : files