Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "GPO ACL"
2020 Feb 26
0
sysvolcheck and aclcheck generates error
Hi,
Search on the net but not getting enough information to resolve the issue.
As per suggestion to check the sysvol but mine got issues.
Currently using CentOS 8.1.1911 and a compiled samba 4.11.4 based on Fedora
31.
I tried also to delete the broken GPO
policy E4108E65-68AB-4E2D-9A00-A9063B1558E3 but I can't delete it (using
samba-tool gpo del {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
2015 Nov 16
0
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and sysvolreset
On my small, one DC AD setup, where I just followed the wiki and did not
(!) make any other changes except for working on the AD through the
RSAT, I ran samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and got the following output:
--------------------snip--------------------
ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
2020 Oct 25
2
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rowland penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> What do you mean by 'working domain' and 'non-working domain' ?
> Do you have two domains ?
Different sites, different companies, not related. The working one was
also a classic upgrade but earlier on, pre 4.6.x. Just using it to
compare.
> I am also trying to understand why
2014 May 13
1
GPO problems on a 4.1.6 AD, classicupgraded, uncaught exception
Hi all,
We'er running a classicupgraded samba4 AD 4.1.6 sernet for a month or
two now, and all is very well. :-) It has been classicupgraded using the
same 4.1.6.
Today I wanted to try GPO's and they are not applied. GPUpdate /force
tells me:
"Windows attempted to read the file blahblah\gpt.ini
from a domain controller and was not successful".
Taken from the mailinglist, I
2016 Jul 24
0
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Hi,
Do you have any specific error message in Windows events log concerning GPO?
Regards
Le 24/07/2016 à 05:40, Min Wai Chan a écrit :
> Dear All,
> I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO
> are having issue
>
> Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate
> success fully.
>
> When I run samba-tool ntacl
2017 Aug 24
0
sysvolreset doesn't reset all ACLs
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:03:42 +0200
Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version
> > Version 4.5.8-Debian
> > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error"
> > no error
> > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
> > ERROR(<class
2020 Oct 25
0
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On 25/10/2020 20:20, Sonic wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rowland penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>> What do you mean by 'working domain' and 'non-working domain' ?
>> Do you have two domains ?
> Different sites, different companies, not related. The working one was
> also a classic upgrade but earlier on, pre 4.6.x. Just
2016 Jul 21
0
gpo not working with samba 4 migrated
I'm not sure what are you deatiling, is a bug in progress taht can cause
this random problems with some gpos or this error can be ignored?
2016-07-21 20:37 GMT+02:00 Trenta sis <trenta.sis at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> First of all thanks for you answer, it seems that this can help, now some
> change made to gpo are applied and we are not receiving error in event
> viewer,
2016 Jul 24
3
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Dear All,
I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO
are having issue
Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate
success fully.
When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset
But don't seem to got it fix..
Any suggestion?
Thank in advance.
#samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Processing section
2017 Apr 25
1
"This security ID may not be assigned as the owner of this object" when trying to create a GPO
I have upgraded Samba from a NT PDC to an AD DC about a week ago.
Everything went pretty well until today. I've already configured about
25 GPO's (through RSAT on a Windows 10 machine) - but when I came to add
more GPO's - it wouldn't let me with the above error message. My specs are:
Samba 4.5.0
Slackware -current 64bit
Kernel 4.4.20
The client machine is a Windows 10 Pro.
2016 Jul 24
0
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Hi,
That's look more like a gpupdate output than an event log entry :-)
Le 24/07/2016 à 20:46, Min Wai Chan a écrit :
> Hello Sébastien Le Ray,
>
> The PC reply the following...
>
> The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user
> name. This could be caused by one or more of the following:
> a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain
2015 Oct 02
3
sysvol acl's broken beyond repair
Hi everyone.
I ran into notorios gpo error on windows clients. When I go to my dc
controller and run
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
I get an error:
ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tsnr.mtt/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
2017 Aug 24
0
sysvolreset doesn't reset all ACLs
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:41:36 +0200
Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 2017-08-24 12:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:03:42 +0200
> > Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> >>> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version
> >>> Version 4.5.8-Debian
> >>>
2016 Jul 22
0
gpo not working with samba 4 migrated
On 7/22/2016 3:37 AM, Rowland penny wrote:
> On 21/07/16 22:18, Trenta sis wrote:
>> I'm not sure what are you deatiling, is a bug in progress taht can cause
>> this random problems with some gpos or this error can be ignored?
>>
>> 2016-07-21 20:37 GMT+02:00 Trenta sis <trenta.sis at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> First of all
2015 Jun 12
1
samba 4.1.13 not applying domain policy in windows XP clients
Hello,
i configured group policy via RSAT in my samba 4.1.13 implementation the
policy applies correctly to my windows 7 clients but not to my windows
XP clients.
when i run gpupdate /force in windows XP it replies that the policies
are apply correctly .... when i run
./samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
2016 Jan 14
0
Cannot add a new GPO opject at GPMC on win7
Hi, guys!
Have some trouble with adding a new GPO.
If i add a new GPO it says me "The parametr is incorrect"
I use RSAT on win7.
I have an AD DC based on samba 4.1.14 on FreeBSD 10.1
Evrything else working fine/
Here is my smb.conf
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = DEVCOM
realm = DEV.COM.UA
netbios name = WIZARD
server role = active directory domain controller
#server services =
2014 Jun 23
1
Command samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Can anyone explain what is happening when I run / usr / local / samba / bin /
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it and an error?
ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO file
/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tdsfs01.net/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Scripts/scripts.ini
2013 Oct 09
2
GPO Permissions _AGAIN_
Hi all,
I'm afraid I'm back to my old issue of GPO permissions.
I have two ADDCs providing an AD Domain (internal.stmaryscollege.co.uk
(short-name 'SMC')). Servers are called 'ad-01' and 'tainan'. ad-01 is
'Version 4.0.10' and tainan is 'Version 4.1.0rc4' (the latest version in
the package repos of the respective OSs (arch and gentoo))
I have
2018 May 25
2
syscolcheck error / Could not convert sid S-1-5-32-544 to uid
Hello,
this is a Samba AD Domain upgraded from Samba 3.x with classicupgrade.
Debian 9.4
Samba: 4.7.6 (packages from tranquil.it)
# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
netbios name = DC1
realm = IWW.LAN
server role = active directory domain controller
workgroup = IWW
idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes
dns forwarder = 172.16.1.12
dsdb:schema update
2014 May 23
1
Cannot edit GPO's anymore via RSAT
Hello all,
I have recently discovered that my user cannot edit GPO's anymore. Every
GPO I try to open, gets me the famous window "*The permissions for this GPO
in the SYSVOL folder are inconsistent with those in Active Directory" * and
then I get another window saying "Access is denied".
I believe that this happened when I upgraded to 4.1.7 from 4.1.3, about 3
weeks ago,