Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "IPs in smbstatus"
2019 Jun 20
3
IPs in smbstatus
Louis,
Please find the o/p below. Have a question, I read somewhere that using
hostname lookups = yes in smb.conf helps with this. Is that correct?
We followed the samba wiki to setup the DNS.
Hostname: winad01
DNS Domain: addom.com
FQDN: winad01.addom.com
ipaddress: 10.10.10.10
-----------
Samba is running as an AD DC
-----------
Checking file: /etc/os-release
2019 Jun 19
0
IPs in smbstatus
What for me looks a bit off.
This is my output ( part of ) smbstatus -a on the AD-DC.
PID Username Group Machine IP Protocol Version Encryption Signing
25843 ADDOM\member-vpn1$ ADDOM\domain computers 192.168.0.2 (ipv4:192.168.0.2:36860) SMB3_11 - AES-128-CMAC
34317 root ADDOM\domain users 192.168.0.5
2019 Jun 19
4
Reverse DNS
Hi,
We have some issue with the reverse DNS in Samba AD. We're running Bind9_DLZ on Ubuntu 18.04. The DHCP server(Ubuntu 16.04) is different to the AD server and not in the same AD domain. The DHCP scope points to the Samba AD server as the DNS server
When a machine with DHCP assigned address tries to update the DNS record, it is able to update the forward zone but not the reverse zone. The
2019 Jun 25
2
Reverse DNS
Hai,
You posted the correct things here, for a quick fix i
I'm buzzy with something else atm but i saw that /dev/urandom part.
Add in the bind9 (named) apparmor profile
# Samba DLZ
/{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/bind9/*.so rm,
/{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/gensec/*.so rm,
/{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/ldb/*.so rm,
/{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/ldb/modules/ldb/*.so rm,
2019 Sep 19
3
DC join failed
Hai,
Try this first.
Change : /etc/krb5.conf
[libdefaults]
default_realm = CONYLEC.LOCAL
dns_lookup_realm = true
dns_lookup_kdc = true
Change to
[libdefaults]
default_realm = CONYLEC.LOCAL
dns_lookup_realm = false
dns_lookup_kdc = true
There is no need to lookup the REALM in the DNS, its the Default REALM.
Then try again to join.
But now
2019 Apr 08
2
Windows / / Windows 10 randomly lost connection to Samba share
On 08.04.19 16:20, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:
> Hai Basti,
>
> Anything in the windows even logs?
> This might be related to smb1 and windows automaticly removing it.
smbstatus say that all open connections are SMB2_10 and SMB3_11
the windows log say: german text and errorcode C0000006
>
> Or something else.
> Can you check with mtr from a windows pc to the
2020 Oct 28
4
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
Good morning Chris
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Sonic [mailto:sonicsmith at gmail.com]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 27 oktober 2020 21:07
> Aan: L.P.H. van Belle
> CC: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:01 AM L.P.H. van Belle via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
2019 Jun 28
1
Curios case of UID
Hi,
Not sure if this has been asked before.
When we create new users in our AD box, they get the UIDs in high 30000
range. Is this normal? If yes, can we change the starting range?
We migrated using ClassicUpgrade, now running Ubuntu 18.04 VM
The smb.conf looks like
workgroup = ADDOM
realm = ADDOM.COM
netbios name = WNAD01
server role = active directory domain
2019 Jun 18
2
domain online backup
He MJ,
Ah, my user does have an UID/GID assigned.
Did you "copy" the administrator user or did you create a new user and gave him administrator rights.
On my DC's.
id username
uid=10002(ADDOM\usernam) gid=10000(ADDOM\domain users) groups=10000(ADDOM\domain users),3000275(ADDOM\internet-proxy-manual).. And more.
Where my Administratos reflex to:
id administrator
uid=0(root)
2020 Oct 26
7
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
> It's needed after every GPO addition and edit. There must be a root
> cause to hunt down somewhere. Or is it a bug in 4.13.0 ?
Yes, and no.
Yes, its a bug.
No, in my opionion its an old setting thats just needs some updating.
Try this.
samba-tool ntacl set
"O:LAG:BAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;BA)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;SO)(A;OICI;0x001f01
2018 Feb 08
2
Bad DSA objectGUID ed8970e5-84cc-43dd-89f1-4af8d6ab675a for sid S-1-5-21-570971082-1333357699-3675202899-1375
Hello,I'm using samba ad dc about a year. I have 2 DCs, One is DC1 with FSMO role. And another is DC2.
there's a error in DC1 when i use dbcheck tool. And samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs--fix can't fix that. And I made a big mistake !
In DC2 I use "tdbbackup -s .bak /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb" create a bak file. and using that bak file replace the sam.ldb
2019 Jun 25
2
Error determinigng PSOs in system [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
UNOFFICIAL
Thanks Tim,
I was just wondering if my mistake was raising the functional-level. This confirms it.
This apparently also broke backup.
I cannot create the container, because the current schema (2003) doesn't support msDS-PasswordSettingsContainer.
It seems impossible (and dangerous) to update the schema.
I was given a reference to a thread about updating the schema but
- the
2023 Jun 23
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: Unable to authenticate to share using UPN
Sorry about that I typed and sent a full message, but it looks like the entire body got swallowed up in transit. Here is the full text again. Let's hope this one works.
I have a server running CentOS 7.9 with the system provided Samba packages (4.10.16-24.el7_9). It is joined to an Active Directory domain and acting as a member server. The active Directory domain has a user object with among
2019 Jun 18
3
domain online backup
Hi,
On 18-6-2019 12:57, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> I have just tried this as root and it worked for me:
>
> samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc4 --targetdir=/backup
> -Urowland at samdom.example.com
>
> When I tried to run it as normal user, it threw an error because the
> user wasn't allowed access to the backup dir, allowing the user access
> cured
2016 Feb 16
2
Problems after migration from samba 3.5.2 to samba 4.3.1
Hi Rowland
> OK, two things jump out at me, I wouldn't use 'EXAMPLE.COM' for the
> workgroup name, I would have just used 'EXAMPLE' i.e. no dot in the name.
>
>
I understand, but, change the workgroup involves migrate domain, right ??
Or can I simply change workgroup and restart samba ??
> Your idmap config stack is incorrect, you only have settings for the
2016 Nov 02
2
Samba and BTRFS server-side copy
Am 02.11.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Saint Germain via samba:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:44:05 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote :
>>>>> I just tried and when I limit samba to SMB2 connections (in
>>>>> smb.conf), Nautilus/gvfs cannot connect (it doesn't even see the
>>>>> share).
>>>>>
2016 Nov 03
2
Samba and BTRFS server-side copy
Am 02.11.2016 um 20:32 schrieb Saint Germain via samba:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:45:31 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote :
>> Am 02.11.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Saint Germain via samba:
>>> On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:44:05 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba
>>> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote :
>>>>>>> I just
2016 Nov 02
2
Samba and BTRFS server-side copy
Am 02.11.2016 um 03:05 schrieb Saint Germain via samba:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:10:12 +0200, Achim Gottinger via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote :
>
>>
>> Am 28.10.2016 um 08:18 schrieb Saint Germain via samba:
>>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:30:09 -0700, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
>>> wrote :
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct
2020 Oct 25
3
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On 25/10/2020 20:37, Sonic wrote:
> The reset allowed the current GPO to take effect, but right after
> adding a new GPO (just named it, no editing, or linking) the
> sysvolcheck fails:
> # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
> ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception
> - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
>
2019 Jun 27
6
Reverse DNS
Hi Rowland,
Just as a test, I installed the dhcp server in the DC ( in the lab). Then configured the dhcp as per the wiki
This is what I see. And again the forward zone update despite the errors but the reverse doesn't
When releasing the lease
Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: Release: IP: 192.168.14.198
Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: execute_statement argv[0] =