similar to: User has no RSOP data ?

Am 03.06.19 um 12:08 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 03/06/2019 10:58, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> Am 03.06.19 um 11:40 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >>> On 03/06/2019 10:22, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>>> samba-4.8.12 on 2 DCs, replication works ... >>>> >>>> An external admin joined a new PC and the GPOs

Am 03.06.19 um 11:40 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 03/06/2019 10:22, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> samba-4.8.12 on 2 DCs, replication works ... >> >> An external admin joined a new PC and the GPOs aren't pulled ... >> >> we get something like "user has no rsop data" > > Never seen that, but a quick google seems to suggest

Am 03.06.19 um 12:48 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > I read a few more of the results that the google search 'user has no > rsop data' returned. It seems it is something that happens fairly often, > for various reasons, from dns, through 'user not logged in', to > 'netlogon server' not running or set to manual, so I repeat, I do not > think this is a

On 03/06/2019 11:29, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 03.06.19 um 12:08 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 03/06/2019 10:58, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>> Am 03.06.19 um 11:40 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >>>> On 03/06/2019 10:22, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>>>> samba-4.8.12 on 2 DCs, replication works ...

is this pc is renamed after it joined the domain? if yes, then you hitted a bug, cant look, im on the road.. but rowland knows how to check for missed updated records in ad. is a ms problem. if no, i still suggest to check these records. ;-). Greetz, Louis Op 3 jun. 2019, om 13:21, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> schreef: On 03/06/2019 12:07, Stefan G.

Hi again, Looking at setting group policy for Linux desktops's chrome installs. Reading through the group policy book (https://dmulder.github.io/group-policy-book/chrome.html#server-side-extension-10) it says I should have some RSOP's for chrome when I've set a policy except Im not seeing these set. I have a policy that is supposed to be setting the home url under

Hello Samba Team, how are you? I'm joining linux clients in the company's environment and I would like to apply GPOs to linux clients, I'm in the testing phase. I'm testing with ubuntu clients version 22.04 and the software I used to join the samba AD was sssd. The 22.04 ubuntu client has joined and everything is working fine except for the GPOs for linux clients. I compiled

On 4/14/23 2:23 AM, Anderson Sampaio Mello via samba wrote: > Hello Samba Team, how are you? > > I'm joining linux clients in the company's environment and I would like to > apply GPOs to linux clients, I'm in the testing phase. > > I'm testing with ubuntu clients version 22.04 and the software I used to > join the samba AD was sssd. > > The 22.04 ubuntu

On 4/14/23 2:23 AM, Anderson Sampaio Mello via samba wrote: > Hello Samba Team, how are you? > > I'm joining linux clients in the company's environment and I would like to > apply GPOs to linux clients, I'm in the testing phase. > > I'm testing with ubuntu clients version 22.04 and the software I used to > join the samba AD was sssd. > > The 22.04 ubuntu

new thread, old issue been fiddling off-list with tips from Louis over the last days, and putting it back to the list to ask for help from others: 2 samba-4.9.11 DCs 1 samba-4.8.12 DM file server GPOs not working cleanly anymore tried to resync completely etc etc - right now I test gpupdate/gpresult on an older (not productive) W2008R2 server which I use for editing stuff via RSAT/MMC I

On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 14:26:01 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 2016-12-30 um 14:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > Is this the smb.conf you got when you ran the classicupgrade ? > > I don't think it is, can I suggest you remove any and all lines you > > have added and restart samba > > that was the

Hi! I have updated our server from Samba 4 alpha 17 to Samba 4.0.1. Everything seems to work fine after some reconfiguration, but our GPOs are not working anymore. Samba 4 alpha 17 was using ntvfs and the root partition with the sysvol share was mounted with "user_xattr" only in /etc/fstab. Samba 4.0.1 is now set to use s3fs and the root partition is mouted with

On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:54:42 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 2016-12-30 um 13:20 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > > And in addition to Rowlands comments.. > > > > Correct you hosts file to > > /etc/hosts > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > > # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable

I get problems with group policies not applied ... seems an older problem surfacing now. Before I debug at current level I consider upgrading the 2 DCs from 4.8.12 (Debian Stretch) to 4.9.9 Anything specific to consider here?

Am 2016-12-12 um 10:56 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 2016-12-12 um 10:41 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> Try removing the mapping between the 'root' group and 'Domain Admins'. >> The AD user Administrator will be mapped to the 'root' user on the DC >> and Administrator is automatically made a member of Domain Admins. > >

Am 2017-05-23 um 18:57 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > can't talk to the DC from the PC via RSAT (for example editing GPOs) > > That has worked already before! Restarted DC VM and client PC ... > > Do I have to raise the level of the domain? I am googling around for > this ... domain level show tells me Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function

And in addition to Rowlands comments.. Correct you hosts file to /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters # This server name and ip. 10.0.0.221 main.arbeitsgruppe.secret.tld main 10.0.0.224 backup.arbeitsgruppe.secret.tld backup Second. Post you

On Tue, 23 May 2017 18:33:45 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists at xunil.at> wrote: > Am 2017-05-23 um 18:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: > > > You don't do it like that on an AD domain, see here: > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roaming_Windows_User_Profiles > > I see ... adding the old params to the new smb.conf didn't help so >

In Samba/NT i was used to share mapping done in netlogon script, so users move around between sites, get home and profile from remote location but still have share mapped from local servers. In Samba/AD, using GPO, share mapping is in ''user policy'', and so user roam between sites and get different policies? I'm googling around but i'm a bit confused... i can still use

i just arrived in italie, there is a bug report on renamed pc's. i suspect the same problem. Gr Louis Op 4 jun. 2019, om 10:57, "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> schreef: Am 03.06.19 um 16:56 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: is this pc is renamed after it joined the domain? if yes, then you hitted a bug, cant look, im on the road.. but