similar to: smbclient -L returns NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH

Shanks for the hint! Very strange that the default is only to use a deprecated protocol… Anyway, this option has no effect on this issue… Yvan Le 31/05/2019 à 18:53, Kris Lou via samba a écrit : > Most likely, your Windows 10 (file server) is disallowing SMB1 connections, > which is the default for smbclient. > > You can force smbclient to use a higher protocol with "smbclient

Most likely, your Windows 10 (file server) is disallowing SMB1 connections, which is the default for smbclient. You can force smbclient to use a higher protocol with "smbclient -m SMB2" https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/smbclient.1.html Kris Lou klou at themusiclink.net On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 9:45 AM Yvan Masson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

On 9/27/19 1:32 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: ....snippity... > I repeat, smbclient never had anything to do with network browsing, so > it is unlikely to have anything to do with Network Discovery. Perhaps > you are thinking of libsmbclient ? this can be used by other packages to > provide network browsing. > > You could always code up what you require and propose it as

On 9/27/19 5:38 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:36:42PM -0500, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> On 9/27/19 1:32 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> ....snippity... >>> I repeat, smbclient never had anything to do with network browsing, so >>> it is unlikely to have anything to do with Network Discovery. Perhaps >>> you are

I am running CentOS 7 with Samba version 4.9.1. I have a Windows shared printer that I cannot set up but I am not sure if this is a CentOS issue or a Samba issue. When I run the printer setup GUI, it is not able to find any shared printer. If I run smbclient I get this error: smbclient -L dap001 -N Unable to initialize messaging context Anonymous login successful ??????????????

Hello, I'm trying to use the "notify" API of libsmbclient, testing against a Samba AD DC. The function is returning with errno=22 (mapped from NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH), and I'm getting the following error message: smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_11] server[dc1.example.com] It looks like libsmbclient is, for some reason, using SMB1 but needs to be

On 9/27/19 1:39 PM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:36:42PM -0500, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> On 9/27/19 1:32 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> ....snippity... >>> I repeat, smbclient never had anything to do with network browsing, so >>> it is unlikely to have anything to do with Network Discovery. Perhaps >>> you

Thank you for answer. Logged in as Guest, then went to Security tab. I see `Everyone', it is given all permissions. Then I went to `Current permissions' tab (I have localized OS at the moment, so probably it is not correct name) and typed in `Everyone' and `Guest' as well: all five permission types are checked. $ smbclient -L 192.168.0.100 -m SMB2     Sharename      

On 9/27/19 1:39 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:36:42PM -0500, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> On 9/27/19 1:32 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> ....snippity... >>> I repeat, smbclient never had anything to do with network browsing, so >>> it is unlikely to have anything to do with Network Discovery. Perhaps >>> you are

On 9/27/19 1:11 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/09/2019 18:57, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> On 9/27/19 12:48 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 27/09/2019 18:33, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> I understand the "Function Discovery" side and wsdd (which is fine >>>> for local same network discovery

On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> Hi Yvan, >> >> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I >> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then >> getting the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just >> a

On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> Hi Yvan, >>> >>> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I >>> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then

On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> Hi Yvan, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the information, really useful.

On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >> >> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:

On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > Hi Yvan, > > Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I need > to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then getting > the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just a little > over a month away, so there is ample time for planning upgrades. > > Best

On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:

On 30-04-2023 12:04, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:

> That is what I did. But it fails even when mounting manually: > 1. Connect on the desktop using domain user "yvan.masson" (either > graphically / TTY / SSH). Kerberos ticket is properly created. > 2. Running "sudo mount -t cifs //ad.FOO.BAR.LOCAL/Echange /mnt -o > user=yvan.masson,cruid=yvan.masson,sec=krb5" fails with "Required key > not

Hi list, For testing purpose, I am running a standalone Samba 4.9.5 on Debian with the following smb.conf: [global] server role = standalone server map to guest = Bad User guest account = nobody [test] path = /home/yvan/Partage/share guest ok = yes writable = yes inherit acls = yes I want "bob", "alice" and guest user to have full access to all files in this share, so I

Le 10/03/2020 ? 11:21, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 10/03/2020 10:10, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Le 10/03/2020 ? 10:37, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>> On 10/03/2020 09:18, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >>>> If think I did not properly explain my setup, sorry for that: Samba >>>> here is not sharing anything. It is just used for