similar to: Samba4 DNS SOA Records

Le 27/05/2019 à 09:50, Rowland penny via samba a écrit : > On 27/05/2019 08:28, Julien TEHERY via samba wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have a setup with 2 DC on a main site, et 14 DCs which are located >> on 7 AD sites. >> I recently noticed in my DNS zones that my SOA record is associated >> to the last DC that was joined to the domain. >> But this DC is

Hi. I'm running Sernet Samba 4.7 on Ubuntu 16. I noticed that when my first DC went away, I had problems. The SOA record for the domain still points at that first DC. I found, in this entry from 2014 ( https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2014-August/184301.html) that "Windows AD servers actually 'lie' about the SOA record, and always say that it points to themselves. So in a

[root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca brockley.harte-lyne.ca ALL -U administrator Password for [BROCKLEY\administrator]: Name=, Records=4, Children=0 SOA: serial=3, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=3600, ns=SMB4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca., email=hostmaster.brockley.harte-lyne.ca. (flags=600000f0, serial=110, ttl=3600) NS:

Thank You Rowland. I did it like You say, killed avahi, added the record without domain suffix, but nothing changed, and the record seems no different compared to other records added with the suffix some time before. My Samba DNS record looks like this (and I see nothing special in there):   Name=, Records=3, Children=0     SOA: serial=39, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=3600,

Hello, I've finally decided to switch all FSMO roles from Windows 2008 R2 DC (vm-dc1) to one of the two Samba 4.12.3 DCs (vm-dc3). Here are several issues I've faced after that: 1. After connecting DNS Manager to the all DCs, I've found that the SOA record for my domain and msdcs zones still point to the former PDC - vm-dc1. Is that OK? 2. So, I've changed the SOA manually

On 07/05/2019 01:55 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > I currently run tinydns and dnscache on my proxy machine.? I was > hoping to keep that going.? I have a Windows Server2004 doing DC work > right now.? Need to update that. >> >> -- >> Bob Wooldridge >> > You can run a caching nameserver that forwards your AD dns zones to > your AD DC, but you can

On 27/05/2019 09:12, Julien TEHERY via samba wrote: > Le 27/05/2019 à 09:50, Rowland penny via samba a écrit : >> On 27/05/2019 08:28, Julien TEHERY via samba wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I have a setup with 2 DC on a main site, et 14 DCs which are located >>> on 7 AD sites. >>> I recently noticed in my DNS zones that my SOA record is associated

Le 19/11/2018 à 12:33, Julien TEHERY via samba a écrit : > Le 19/11/2018 à 11:14, Marco Gaiarin via samba a écrit : >> Mandi! Julien TEHERY via samba >>    In chel di` si favelave... >> >>> Is there a good pratice when adding new remote DCs in terms of >>> replication >>> topology? >> I think you have to define a topology of the domain, using

Hi all, I am experiencing strange behaviour regarding DNS resolution with my samba-driven AD. This is with Debian-packaged samba on raspberry Pi: # samba -V Version 4.19.5-Debian # uname -a Linux dc3.ad.mydomain.tld 6.1.0-rpi8-rpi-v8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Debian 1:6.1.73-1+rpt1 (2024-01-25) aarch64 GNU/Linux I would expect that every DNS server of the domain would respond with the same SOA record. But

Am 17.12.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 17/12/15 14:56, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >> >> Am 17.12.2015 um 15:33 schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 17/12/15 13:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >>>> Rowland, thank you, but before we do that: >>>> >>>> - what now with the 'gc' record? 2nd DC yes or no? >>> >>> Which one

On 29/02/16 11:51, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.02.2016 um 12:29 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 29/02/16 10:45, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.02.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> On 29/02/16 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 29.02.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Rowland penny:

On 29/02/16 10:45, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.02.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 29/02/16 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.02.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> Everything you say is valid except for when it comes to AD dns. >>>> When you want data from a zone, you start with the SOA record, you

On 10/12/15 10:54, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/12/15 10:44, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >> >> Ah, ok, wel, yeah, i was missing the NS on the SOA. >> >> This is imo a bug, i dont know it this is by design for samba, >> so maybe a samba dev can answere this since every joined DC should >> have a NS record on the SOA as far as i know, but thats my

On 13/02/2020 13:11, Paul Littlefield wrote: > On 12/02/2020 13:08, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> The first is that a DC must use itself as its nameserver and if >> something goes wrong e.g. Samba has fallen over, then there isn't >> much point having another nameserver, Samba isn't going to use it >> >> The second is, it will not hurt having a second

Hi, all! There is no check of NS records in this document https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record For example, with two DCs at myzone $ host -t NS myzone dc1 (or dc2, or myzone) must return two records: myzone name server dc1.myzone. myzone name server dc2.myzone. $ host -t NS _msdcs.myzone dc1 (or dc2, or myzone) must return two records: _msdcs.myzone name

Hi, How can the SOA record of a domain be changed? I need to decrease expire and minttl Thanks. -- P?ter Varkoly Greuleinweg 37. D-90411 N?rnberg

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:12:37 +0200 Hajdu Szabolcs via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I configured it but no luck apparmor is configured as the link > suggests i tried to rejoin and deleted the local database manually > but then still recreates these five zones with CNF and gives the > error. > > CNF = Collision Something is creating the objects in AD and

On 02/12/15 10:31, mj wrote: >> I can find on the internet multiple instances of 'every DC running dns >> should have a SOA record', but I cannot find any concrete examples of an >> ldif that shows this. Does each DC have a separate SOA record in AD, or >> is there just one SOA record and the DC just claims to be the SOA, or is >> there just one SOA record

Hai, Ah, ok, wel, yeah, i was missing the NS on the SOA. This is imo a bug, i dont know it this is by design for samba, so maybe a samba dev can answere this since every joined DC should have a NS record on the SOA as far as i know, but thats my opinion and i can be wrong here. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

On 29/02/16 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.02.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Rowland penny: >> Everything you say is valid except for when it comes to AD dns. >> When you want data from a zone, you start with the SOA record, you ask >> 'who holds the records for this zone?', it replies with the nameserver >> that holds the zone records. OK so far ? >>