similar to: Building on RHEL 8

On Fri, 2019-05-17 at 17:29 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > > Mock can't resolve the confusion for RHEL 8, which may be fixable with > > mock updates, but right now my use of "mock" for Samba is blocked. > > The workaround is to change the "mock" configuration to use "best=0". > The new "module" RPMs lead to confusion

Hi everyone, I've posted some updated source and binary rpms following the release of updates by the samba project. Updated rpms include samba-4.10.6 and ldb-1.5.5. Here are the links: - http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.6/RHEL7 As usual, these work fine for me (4.10.6) but YMMV. Please do report issues if you find some. Regards, Vincent

Hi Nico, that's amazing! Let me digest it because I am not sure if I can perform the installation properly. I will get back to you once done. Thanks very much, Metin Mobile! ________________________________ From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2023 1:03:52 PM To: Metin Koc <metkoc at outlook.com> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at

On Sat, 18 May 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:32 PM Tom Diehl via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a new Centos 7.6 VM that I self compiled 4.10.3 and joined it to an >> existing samba AD domain that has 2 existing DCs. One of the existing DCs is >> running 4.8.7 and the other is running

Thanks for that suggestion, however that piece is a 'work in progress', but not the actual problem I am facing right now. FYI - domain controller piece works flawlessly on the 4.4.180 kernel build based around CentOS6 including many integration tests to Windows DC / replication and the like that I have configured. -----Original Message----- From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nkadel at

On Mon, 20 May 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:33 PM <me at tdiehl.org> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 18 May 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:32 PM Tom Diehl via samba >>> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have a new Centos

I've been spending some time backporting Samba 4.0.3 from Fedora 19 to RHEL 6, partly as proof of concept, partly to make it available to others. I've published my work at: https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/ The key RPM building tools are at: https://github.com/nkadel/samba-4.0.3-srpm/ And there are dependencies listed for libtalloc, libtevent,

correction samba-dc still doesn't come with samba-tool On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to start testing this? I saw a few months back Alexander > Bokovoy Released a build for F23 and I started using that. Now that F24 > is out I have to look for a way to upgrade. Is there a build for rawhide > with this?

On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 10:38 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 11:43 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 07:43 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 7:20 AM Andreas Habel via samba > > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >

Il giorno mar, 03/09/2019 alle 10.49 +0100, Rowland penny via samba ha scritto: > At the moment, yes, Samba is using Heimdal, but extensive work has > been done by Samba Team members to use MIT, but there is further work > to do. I have open this RedHat/Fedora bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748860 If someone have some suggest, let us know. Thanks -- Dario Lesca

On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 5:22 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > See above. Also, the base CentOS 7 3.10.0 kernel is becoming a bit > dated: it's 5 years old now. If you have time: can you set up a > smaller instance, do kernel updates on top of a CentOs 7 AMI, and see > if *that* AMI is compatible with the new instances? Might make for an > interesting

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:54:05PM +0200, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> Hi List, >> >> I do my best to ask my question in english. ;-) >> >> Samba4 integrated heimdal kerberos to do the kerberos work for >> Active Directory. Some Linux Distributions like fedora/RedHat and >>

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:07:54AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> Sorry about the accidental bulky quoting! Boston public transit is still slow from storms, and I'm using my phone right now.

Hi, I managed to compile 4.10.0 under CentOS 7.6. I did the following: - update the yum package repository cache: sudo yum makecache - install yum-utils: sudo yum install yum-utils - add the IUS package repository: sudo yum install https://centos7.iuscommunity.org/ius-release.rpm - update the yum package repository cache again: sudo yum makecache - install Python 3.6 including PIP: sudo yum

What part of ?Password Authentication is disabled? do you not understand? > Am 18.12.2016 um 11:21 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com>: > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Philipp Vlassakakis > <philipp at vlassakakis.de> wrote: >> Dear list members, >> >> I want to extend the logging of the openssh-server, so it also logs the entered

I'm looking at a CentOS 5 Xen server that I'd really like to put some more recent VM's. There are reasons not to touch it at the moment, so I can't upgrade it in place today. Has anyone successfully installed a CentOS 6 VM, paravirtualized, on a CentOS 5 Xen server , without significant Xen upgrades? If so, can I get a copy from a reputable source, or one that I can review before

Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> writes: > I'm just trying to figure out under what normal circumstances a > connection with X11 forwarding enabled wouldn't be owned by a user who > already has normal system privileges for ssh, sftp, and scp access. Some OS distributions (FreeBSD, RHEL / CentOS, probably Fedora) have X11Forwarding enabled by default. DES --

On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 10:08 AM Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 09:50:45 -0500 > Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > If you want your clients to update their own records, then let them, > > > but be aware that any Unix clients will not even try. > > > > Well, they can try. It

I concur with Nico ? logging plaintext passwords is an extremely bad idea. The tone of the poster also leaves much to be desired ? but I?ll hold my tongue for now. -- Regards, Uri Blumenthal On 12/18/16, 11:48, "openssh-unix-dev on behalf of Nico Kadel-Garcia" <openssh-unix-dev-bounces+uri=ll.mit.edu at mindrot.org on behalf of nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: On Sun, Dec 18,

I'm dealing with an old Xen 3 server, and badly need to update it and all the vm's on it to more contemporary operating systems. So far, so good! Can the Xen server on CentOS 5 para-virtualized CentOS 6? And if not, I'm having real trouble getting a live cd or installation media to boot in full virtualization to do the update of the guests. I'd normally start by updating the Xen