similar to: Error smb_panic(): calling panic action [/bin/sleep 999999999]

No I can not upgrade now it is a working system with x users. The master dc with the same config is working without any issues. So when I upgrade I must do the uprgade on both replicating samba server and the samba fileservers? No hint form e to repair: May 16 14:00:12 s4slave smbd[7141]: [2019/05/16 14:00:12.438121, 0] ../source3/lib/util.c:801(smb_panic_s3) May 16 14:00:12 s4slave smbd[7141]:

Hello alAl, after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs from the crash see here: .0.31:445] Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: [2020/04/16 13:36:47.546559, 0] ../../source3/lib/util.c:830(smb_panic_s3) Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: PANIC (pid 6263): vfs_full_audit.c: name table

Hello. At a customer's site I had: _ Windows 2008 DC; _ Samba 4.8 fileserver on FreeBSD 11.3/amd64 on UFS; _ several Windows and Mac clients. Recently, having to move to Samba 4.10, I decided to bring up a new fileserver in a jail (and let the base 4.8 one die after transferring all shares). I have no problems with Windows clients, but several strange things are happening with Macs.

Dear Samba fellows, I try to install samba on my notebook in order to get it into my samba based domain. It was a bit picky to get everything assembled on the notebook - but that last issue is hard. :-( I installed it from the sources on Debian Jessie - exactly in the same manner I used for my servers. I got sssd and kerberos working... > root at alecto:/usr/src/samba4/samba-4.2.0#

Can someone point me at how the machine account plays into permitting access here? [it] path = /mnt/data/samba/data/it valid users = CUSTOMER\sgw CUSTOMER\fhäu @CUSTOMER\edv read only = No browseable = No A user out of the group "edv" uses the PC "p10013". Sometimes he gets access, sometimes not. Logs show: (a) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [P10013$]

Dear List, I updated to samba 4.12.10-SerNet-Debian-9.buster from 4.12.9 and did a gluster volume set volume performance.write-behind off Now I get this in /var/log/syslog and randomly people don't get access to a shae. Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]: [2020/11/09 15:56:14.078120,? 0] ../../source3/lib/popt_common.c:68(popt_s3_talloc_log_fn) Nov? 9 15:56:14 ctdb-host smbd[16832]:??

I simply added 'smb' to 'server service' and got: [2016/03/13 18:05:15.524842, 5, pid=27511, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../lib/dbwrap/dbwrap.c:146(dbwrap_lock_order_state_destructor) release lock order 2 for /usr/local/samba/var/lock/serverid.tdb [2016/03/13 18:05:15.524866, 10, pid=27511, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../lib/dbwrap/dbwrap.c:133(debug_lock_order) lock order:

Am 2015-12-29 um 18:59 schrieb Rowland penny: > NO! This will give you precisely 0 users > > config * == the range the 'builtin' users will be mapped to. > config customer == the range for all the domain users that have a > uidNumber attribute. If a user doesn't have a uidNumber attribute > containing a number inside the range set in smb.conf (in your case >

Dear Jeremy, thanks for your reply. I assume I load the the debug symbols by passing something in the [global] section? I now changed back to a fuse_mount to get my colleagues back to work again. Tomorrow at 17 CEST I can add a test share with vfs_glusterfs to test it. Best Bene Am 09.11.20 um 17:55 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 04:01:47PM +0100, Benedikt Kale? via

I am trying to install samba 4.5.1 from source, as a domain controller only, under Ubuntu 16.04, with ZFS filesystem (actually inside an lxd container with ZFS backing). Out-of-the-box, samba-tool domain provision does not like the filesystem: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix

> On 29 Oct 2015, at 23:22, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:27:49PM +0100, Thomas Werschlein wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Since we changed our installation from Samba 3.x to 4.x (currently 4.2.5 on Solaris 11.1), we repeatedly encounter the following 'widelinks_warning', originating from Windows Server 2012 R2 RDS

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 19:52:35 +0100 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:37:25 +0000 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > > > Is 'winbind' installed and running ? > > > > Yes it is. Isn't "wbinfo" supposed to go through winbind anyway? > 'wbinfo -i

On 16/05/2019 14:04, Mueller wrote: > I fear when I do a > 'samba-tool dbcheck' this will do the rest to kill the affected samba . Can I do it ? Just checking AD shouldn't do anything other than tell you if you have a problem or not, so yes, check it. > > > Smb.conf on Master only global: > > [global] > workgroup = TPLK > realm = tplk.loc

Hello ! I decided to upgrade my fileservers from stretch/samba 4.9 to buster/samba 4.11 I just realized that smbd is not working anymore :-/ If someone has an idea It would be amazing... as an idiot, I upgraded my 20 servers.... without snapshot.... Thank you so much Here's some logs : root at ef113:~# tail /var/log/samba/log.smbd #1

Hello, I'm trying to set up a SAMBA server serving a GlusterFS volume. Everything works fine if I locally mount the GlusterFS volume (`mount -t glusterfs ...`) and then serve the mounted FS through SAMBA, but the performance is slower by a 2x/3x compared to a SAMBA server with a local ext4 filesystem. I gather that SAMBA vfs_glusterfs module can give better performance. However, as soon as I

Hi, everybody. I can't understand the nature of the exact error on my samba-server. I'd be very thanksfull for some help... Here's situation: One Linux-server (CentOS 7.2) with Samba and a network of 14 noteboks (win 10). At some point, during working day, smb starts dumping core and syslog giving us the following: 2016-01-16 18:45:15 err infoclinik daemon smbd 2016-01-16

Forgot to mention that this is on Centos 8. So maybe something different than this: https://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg163085.html Regards Christian Am 16.04.20 um 13:45 schrieb Christian Naumer via samba: > Hello alAl, > after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the > vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs > from the

Am 2015-12-30 um 10:40 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > Thanks a lot for that explanation. > I read it after it started working here yesterday so excuse my late > reply. I never understood it the way you described it above, this would > have helped me with other servers earlier as well. Maybe off topic or another issue, but I add it to this thread as it affects the same server. The

Hello. Today a box I manage throwed a lot of these (Samba 4.3.3 working as an ADS member on FreeBSD 10.1/amd64): > Mar 7 15:18:54 xxxxxx smbd_audit[51710]: connect to service xxxxxxxxx by user XXXXXXXX\xxxxxxxx > Mar 7 15:18:54 xxxxxx smbd_audit[51710]: open XXXXXXXXX/XXXXXXXXX.ods (fd 9) > Mar 7 15:18:54 xxxxxx smbd_audit[51710]: [2016/03/07 15:18:54.364808, 0]

Hi, I had issues using"vfs objects = acl_xattr" (possibly too old version [Version 4.13.13-Debian] for the needed "acl_xattr:security_acl_name = user.samba" option needed if running in a non-priv container). So I tried "vfs objects = acl_tdb" and found it working. In https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support I found: File systems without xattr support