Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Group Permissions Not Working"
2016 Aug 09
0
Hyper-V Virtual Machines fail to start on Samba shares
Hello,
As you said, I have changed Samba configuration and reconfigure Active
Directory domain, but still the same problem, I cannot start Hyper-V
Virtual Machine stored on Samba shares.
*# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf*[global]
workgroup = RES
netbios name = dsshp2
vfs objects = acl_xattr shadow_copy2 fileid
fileid:mapping = fsid
encrypt passwords = yes
domain logons = no
2016 Aug 04
7
Hyper-V Virtual Machines fail to start on Samba shares
Hello,
I have problem with Samba 4.4.3. I'd like to use SMB 3.02 file shares as
shared storage for Hyper-V in Windows Server 2012 R2. I am able to create
Virtual Machine on Samba share using guest access, but when I try to start
VM I'm getting the following error:
"An error occurred while attempting to start the selected virtual
machine(s).
'New Virtual Machine' could not
2018 Feb 26
0
Fwd: Client fails to mount with Samba running as daemon. Fine in foreground.
Hi all,
Experiencing a really weird issue on my Samba instance (4.7.5). It is not
allowing users to browse any shares when running as a systemctl daemon, but
it is working fine when running as a foreground service.
Contents of systemctl service unit:
# cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/smb.service
[Unit]
Description=Samba SMB Daemon
After=syslog.target network.target nmb.service winbind.service
2018 Jul 05
2
NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY accessing a DC shared resource
I have a working Samba 4.7.6 DC with the default /sysvol and /netlogon
shares.
These shares work perfectly and domain users can access them without any
issue.
Now, to ease experimenting with config files and stuff (it's not a
production server), I've added a /rootdisk share (path=/) limiting its
access ro root and domain admins:
---------
# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
2020 Feb 04
0
Winbind problems
On 04/02/2020 17:36, Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> To "Domain User" group no, I haven't.
> >I would give 'Domain Users' a gidNumber.
> Now I assign a gidNumber.
>
> I'm following this article:
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs
>
> But in "Setting Share Permissions and
2020 Feb 04
2
Winbind problems
Hi,
>> To "Domain User" group no, I haven't.
>I would give 'Domain Users' a gidNumber.
Now I assign a gidNumber.
I'm following this article:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs
But in "Setting Share Permissions and ACLs", the acces is denied, as the
log messages:
[2020/02/04 15:13:38.266457, 3]
2015 Apr 12
0
Samba as AD member can not validate domain user
Cit?ju jd at ionica.lv:
> Hi!
>
> the previous problems were solved (thank you, Rowland!), but few
> issues remains:
>
> I get such msg in log:
> 0. Is it possible to tell samba to output messages in logs as one
> line per message (even if it is long one?)
>
> 1. 2015/04/12 11:32:39.293583, 3]
> ../source3/smbd/msdfs.c:971(get_referred_path)
>
2015 Apr 12
6
Samba as AD member can not validate domain user
Hi!
the previous problems were solved (thank you, Rowland!), but few
issues remains:
I get such msg in log:
0. Is it possible to tell samba to output messages in logs as one line
per message (even if it is long one?)
1. 2015/04/12 11:32:39.293583, 3]
../source3/smbd/msdfs.c:971(get_referred_path)
get_referred_path: |shareX| in dfs path \FS\shareX is not a dfs root.
(seems it is not
2014 Mar 06
0
string_to_sid: SID @groupname is not in a valid format
Hi all,
I've installed samba (Sernet 3.6.22 on CentOS 6) on a NATed system and now I'm not able to connect or write to my shares.
The message in the log says:
[2014/03/06 09:45:38.849457, 3, pid=48264, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../libcli/security/dom_sid.c:208(dom_sid_parse_endp)
string_to_sid: SID @smc_cc is not in a valid format
[2014/03/06 09:45:38.850510, 3, pid=48264,
2019 May 10
4
nfs4acl_xattr & Samba
Is nfs4acl_xattr available in any version of samba? I just upgraded to 4.9.6 but it doesn’t seem to be baked in.
2015 Apr 12
2
Samba as AD member can not validate domain user
On 12/04/15 11:19, jd at ionica.lv wrote:
>
> Cit?ju jd at ionica.lv:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> the previous problems were solved (thank you, Rowland!), but few
>> issues remains:
>>
>> I get such msg in log:
>> 0. Is it possible to tell samba to output messages in logs as one
>> line per message (even if it is long one?)
>>
>> 1.
2020 Feb 08
3
Winbind problems
Hi,
>||||||Do not set ANY additional share parameters, such as force user or
>valid users. Adding them to the share definition can prevent you from
>configuring or using the share.
OK, sorry.
Now is working properly.
I'm copying the Windows files to Samba4 and I'm not able to copy the NTFS
security information. In the logs it states that the destination is not an
NTFS system.
2014 Jun 03
1
How to grant access to file shares by AD groups that have spaces in their name?
Hi,
I hava a Samba4 file server joined to a Samba4 domain.
I made a share for all members of the INFINITY domain 'Domain Users' group to access:
[demoshare]
comment = Test share
path = /usr/local/samba/demoshare
read only = no
valid users = @"INFINITY+Domain Users"
but no group member can access it. Any ideas what is wrong?
It works if I change the group to
2014 Mar 24
1
certain users can't map home directories
Very odd issue. Transitioning over to a new samba 3.6.9 (from 3.0.33)
server. Majority of the users are ok, but a handful of users cannot map
their home directories from windows7 clients. Logged into XP their homes
map fine. They pass authentication:
(log snippet)
[2014/03/24 17:20:43.277337, 3] auth/auth.c:219(check_ntlm_password)
check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped
2018 Jan 15
0
Access to Windows 2016 server works with IP but not with netbios name
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:15:07 -0500
Rob Marshall <rob.marshall17 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
>
> I'm sorry if I just didn't understand what you were saying. I know
> next to nothing about Samba and I'm looking at a customer environment.
> I happen to support a product that includes Samba (which is stuck at a
> 3.6.x variant because it's stuck on an
2013 Jan 21
1
Samba 3.6.10 not reading groups
Helpp! :) We didn't catch this in testing and now it's killing me in production!
I'm getting stuck with my fresh build of Samba 3.6.10. It isn't honoring groups specified in the valid users clause of the share configuration.
I'm running in security = SHARE mode, and user authentication is working just fine. Even if I specify individual users on the valid users = line, it
2015 Aug 04
0
Samba 4.2 AD member accesible by name but not by IP
Hi Ivo,
I think I've a very similar issue on 4.1.16
and it seem that
hosts allow = 10.15. 127.0.0.1
interfaces = localhost, re0
is to blame.
please try to comment them and see if that work.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Ivo Karabojkov <karabojkov at kit.bg> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a strange problem with Samba AD member:
> It is accessible via \\server or
2019 Oct 16
3
Can't setup kerberos auth for samba4 server?
Hi!
Setup: Debian, Samba 4.11
After successfully setting up samba4, I want this machine to authenticate
against the running samba4-server. I've created /etc/krb5.conf:
[libdefaults]
default_realm = ADA.DE <http://ada.de/>
dns_lookup_realm = false
dns_lookup_kdc = true
kdc_timesync = 1
ccache_type = 4
forwardable = true
proxiable
2014 Jul 31
0
Access denied when accessing via hostname
Hi
I'm using Samba 3.6.3 on ubuntu 12.04 as a domain member with AD on Win
Server 2012.
My hare is configured like this:
valid users = @"EVSOFFICE.LOCAL+dangroup"
When I try to connect to a share via IP from Win7 (part of the domain) it
succeeds but when use host name \\node15 I can see shares but double-click
on share shows AccessDenied.
I'm trying to connect as
2020 Oct 12
2
samba AD problem after re-join domain
I've been working on a Samba AD setup with a bunch of test machines -
the one DC, and a bunch of clients.? Last night, I ended up switching
the name of the test machines temporarily (except the DC), and
re-joining the domain (that's for another e-mail later).? When things
didn't work the way I had planned,? I switched the hostnames back, and
re-joined the domain today on all the