similar to: GPO Filtering Denied

> From: Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Date: 04/19/2019 08:29 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] GPO Filtering Denied > Sent by: "samba" <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:00:32 -0600 > Durwin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I followed Part 1, Part

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:55:43 -0600 durwin at mgtsciences.com wrote: > > From: Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > > To: samba at lists.samba.org > > Date: 04/19/2019 08:29 AM > > Subject: Re: [Samba] GPO Filtering Denied > > Sent by: "samba" <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> > > > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:00:32

> On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:26:09 -0600 > durwin at mgtsciences.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Centos is RHEL recompiled and as such, it will suffer from the same > > > problems as Fedora (some people call Fedora, RHEL testing) from the > > > Samba point of view. Basically, if you are going to change distro, > > > you need to find

> > > > > > There are two opensource kerberos servers, one is MIT, which is the > > > default on red-hat distros, the other is Heimdal, which is the > > > default for Samba. After a lot of work, Fedora is now using MIT > > > with Samba, but there is still a lot more to do, so it is > > > recommended to only use the Fedora packages for testing

I have hollowed these instructions. https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/full-howto-Ubuntu18.04-samba-AD_DC.txt My normal domain is company.com. For the Samba domain it is msi.company.com. DNS is working. I ran these commands. host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.msi.company.com. _ldap._tcp.msi.company.com has SRV record 0 100 389 dc0.msi.company.com. host -t SRV _kerberos._udp.msi.company.com.

Greetings. I have provisioned a test AD domain (single DC initially), and joined a single workstation to it. When I use the "Default Domain Policy" that already exist on the newly domain tree, the user level policies are applied perfectly, but machine level policies don't. The "Default Domain Policy" includes "Authenticated Users" read and apply on the

> > There are two opensource kerberos servers, one is MIT, which is the > default on red-hat distros, the other is Heimdal, which is the default > for Samba. After a lot of work, Fedora is now using MIT with Samba, but > there is still a lot more to do, so it is recommended to only use the > Fedora packages for testing and Samba with MIT is marked as > experimental. >

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:02:42 -0600 durwin at mgtsciences.com wrote: > > > > There are two opensource kerberos servers, one is MIT, which is the > > default on red-hat distros, the other is Heimdal, which is the > > default for Samba. After a lot of work, Fedora is now using MIT > > with Samba, but there is still a lot more to do, so it is > > recommended to

> I think the 10.0.06 entry was created during domain creation. I'd skim > thru dns records from an windows machine if possible and delete all > occurences of unwanted ip adresses. I assume the gpo's still can not be > loaded during logon on the client? Did you inspect gpresult /h result.html? I did remove the record for 10.0.0.6 now. Currently I only have 10.0.1.6 in the DNS

When I run "gpresult /R" on one of my domain users the ". . . following security groups" listed at the bottom of the output includes "Denied RODC Password Replication Group". Did a little web search digging and found that RODC stands for Read Only Domain Controller. My domain consists of two DC's and one member server with three W10 workstations. I have never

Am 09.08.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Rainer Meier via samba: >> I think the 10.0.06 entry was created during domain creation. I'd skim >> thru dns records from an windows machine if possible and delete all >> occurences of unwanted ip adresses. I assume the gpo's still can not be >> loaded during logon on the client? Did you inspect gpresult /h >> result.html? >

On 11/3/2016 9:59 AM, Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote: > Thanks Lingpanda101 > > Following the result of command: > > # file: Policies/{0F1E5B10-3640-4FFE-AA6B-5DE4CFF73625} > # owner: 10060 > # group: 30028 > user::rwx > user:10060:rwx > user:3000002:rwx > user:3000010:r-x > group::rwx > group:30028:rwx > group:30032:r-x > group:30033:rwx >

Any event id for this one? If its event id : 1110. Open CMD box, type ipconfig /all And post the result. I suppect one of the following. 1) pc cloned without sysprep, so multiple pc's with same SID. 2) wrong DNS-Domain suffix 3) wrong DNS-Search suffix Test this by remove you pc from domain, add it again, reboot. Login with the same user. Greetz, Louis >

Looks like a "missing" right. Cause The issue was caused by insufficient permissions to access the source file on the network location. Although "Computer" part of Group Policy runs as a SYSTEM account, this applies to the target client computer, not the server where shared files are stored. Resolution Give Authenticated Users "Read-Only" access to the network

Hello! Tenhos a samba 4.3.2 as ADDC, all OK, porpém'm with a doubt, I would like to apply a GPO for validity of passwords, but the CRAR the gpo at the station to perform: gpresult / t MY GPO> Filtering: Not Applied (Empty) The GPO appears as "blank" if exeutar net user% USERNAME% / domain it appears that the date is being set by the ( samba-domain tool PasswordSettings

new thread, old issue been fiddling off-list with tips from Louis over the last days, and putting it back to the list to ask for help from others: 2 samba-4.9.11 DCs 1 samba-4.8.12 DM file server GPOs not working cleanly anymore tried to resync completely etc etc - right now I test gpupdate/gpresult on an older (not productive) W2008R2 server which I use for editing stuff via RSAT/MMC I

Hi Rowland Following the results to: *USER:* wbinfo --uid-info=10060: bacci:*:10060:30049:bacci:/home/EMPRESA/bacci:/bin/false *GROUP:* wbinfo --gid-info=30028: Domain Admins wbinfo --gid-info=30032: Domain Users wbinfo --gid-info=30033: Enterprise Admins "I don't see user:3000003" root at dc1:~# wbinfo -G 3000003 S-1-5-11 root at dc1:~# wbinfo -s S-1-5-11 failed to call

I'm having problems with GPO in Samba 4.2.1 I created a GPO to Block Control Panel and applied in my Domain OU. In desktop client I typed "gpupdate /force" and appear a success message that to ask reboot my system. After rebuot the GPO don't work. Other GPOs as WSUS update, Wallpaper and others, don't work too. Following is the result of command: GPRESULT /H

Hi all, On 21.10.19 17:38, Martin Tessun wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > On 20.10.19 19:16, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 20/10/2019 16:52, Martin Tessun via samba wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am having the same issue that is described in an older thread >>> here: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-February/213656.html >>> >>>

Hi All New to running Samba ad on a server and could do with a little advise. I have build and Ubuntu 18.04 server with Samba 4 AD just 1 server and nothing else. The installation went fine with no issues and I have added a windows 10 pc to the domain and can login to the pc with any account I have created on the domain. I have installed RSAT tools to user with users and computers and Group