similar to: cutting corners (4.10.2 on el7.6)

Hi Garming, Thanks for taking the time to enlighten me. I do happen to have two DC's and in my limited testing, 4.10.2 seems to function properly as an AD/DC on el7.6 with the packages I built. As I'm not using those DC's for file serving in a clustered setup, it is also my interpretation that I can do without ctdb (this one had a specific requirement for a higher version of a

Hi, I don't think any of those matter for your use. An older version of GnuTLS means we likely just use internally implemented functions (which we are trying to deprecate though). I don't know exactly what DMAPI is used for, but it's not a default configuration and file server clustering doesn't have any relevance for just an AD DC. Cheers, Garming On 16/04/19 10:57 AM,

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.8.11 that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). Comments most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.11 If you're on RHEL7/Centos7, you've got several repos to choose from: http://azzurro.ezplanet.net/el7

Hai,   I've updated the Samba 4.8.10 packages for Debian 9   Repo info : https://apt.van-belle.nl/ Build logs: https://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Buildlogs/stretch/ Short version: apt-get install apt-transport-https # optional if you setup https apt repo. wget -O - http://apt.van-belle.nl/louis-van-belle.gpg-key.asc | apt-key add - echo "deb http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian

On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 16:09 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba > 4.8.10 > that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for > my > SOHO). Comments most welcomed. > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 How do you build this on

On 08/06/2019 21:32, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 08/06/2019 16:24, Uwe Laverenz via samba wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> when you join a linux server to an active directory with "realm" it >> uses "sssd" as default. This works well as long as you just want to >> be a simple domain member. >> >> As soon as you want a real member

On Sun, 2019-04-07 at 12:38 -0400, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote: > > > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10 > > > > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle 3.2 > > ? > > Hi Sergio, > that's a very good question. I built these on rhrl7.6 with gnutls- >

On 10/06/2019 16:04, vincent at cojot.name wrote: > > There is probably some amount of redtape on this but AFAIK it works > fine for me: My RHEL7.6 hypervisors are joined to my AD DC 4.10.4 VMs > through use of realm '(and thus sssd): > > Here's a RHEL7.6 client: > # realm list > ad.lasthome.solace.krynn > ? type: kerberos > ? realm-name:

Adding Alexander (cc'ed, thank you) Hi Sergio, I found some hints (dating back almost a year ago) about why gnutls-3.4 might be needed: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-April/127282.html I don't know how much of this still holds true (I've been running an AD DC with rhel7's gnutls 3.3.z for over a year without apparent issues). Regards, Vincent On Mon, 8

Hi everyone, I've posted some updated source and binary rpms following the release of updates by the samba project. Updated rpms include samba-4.10.6 and ldb-1.5.5. Here are the links: - http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.6/RHEL7 As usual, these work fine for me (4.10.6) but YMMV. Please do report issues if you find some. Regards, Vincent

Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.3, 4.10.11 and 4.9.17 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The 4.11 rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.3

Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The 4.11 rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.2

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.10.8 that I'm using on RHEL7.7. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). These rpms use the default python2 from the system. The 4.10.x SPEC file is now more closely aligned with upstream (Fedora SPEC file) and I've yet to test these builds using the system's python3 on RHEL7.

Hi everyone, In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.10.4 that I'm using on RHEL7.7. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO). Comments most welcomed. These rpms use the default python2 from the system. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.7 http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.9.12 Regards, Vincent

Hi Konstantin, True, for 4.11.y I didn't backport the changes I made on 4.9.x/4.10.x for glusterfs. Is this what you were talking about? Vincent On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, Konstantin Shalygin via samba wrote: >> Ah, good catch! I'll update it shortly. >> Thanks > > Vincent, this issue still not fixed even for samba 4.11.6 > > > > Thanks, > > k >

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > On 11/5/19 8:26 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote: >> can you provide more detail? >> >> RHEL7 has libtomcrypt but no devel rpm for it. >> That's the onoy issue I had with it. > > tomcrypt.h is required for build this package. Yes, that's the reason I've rebuilt libtomcrypt from the RHEL sources (see

This is a common error. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Bart??omiej Solarz-Nies??uchowski via samba > Verzonden: maandag 16 september 2019 14:09 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > CC: ubi >> Maciej Wysocki

> That's probably because you don't have a system-wide install of ldb on > your system. Here's what I have on mine: > > # rpm -qa libldb\* > libldb-1.4.6-2.el7.x86_64 > libldb-devel-1.4.6-2.el7.x86_64 > > # rpm -qf /usr/include/ldb.h > libldb-devel-1.4.6-2.el7.x86_64 > I have libldb-1.3.4-1.el7.x86_64 which is the stock CentOS 7.6 version. From where

Hi Konstantin, On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Konstantin Shalygin via samba wrote: > Vincent, excellent work! Thank you. Glad it's helping others. > Can you also provide support for rados vfs (already exists in SPEC) and > ctdb_mutex_ceph_rados_helper? That's probably doable but you'd have to BETA-test for me since I don't have a working ceph cluster at home. The information

That's clearly a documentation bug. As for the samba integration, it's now in its own guide: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/windows_integration_guide/index (this is what I followed on 7.5/7.6 to consume realmd). Let me open a BZ about this... Regards, Vincent On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 12/06/2019 16:31,