similar to: AD username change in Linux Stations

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "AD username change in Linux Stations"

2013 May 29
0
Relação de aprovados Mar Vermelho
Rela??o de aprovados Mar Vermelho: ?gua Clara: ANA PAULA RODRIGUES DA SILVA, LUCAS ARAUJO GOMES FROTA, GABRIEL VICTOR BARROS FORTE DA SILVA, QUIT?RIA DA SILVA G?IS, JO?O CARLOS MOREIRA DE CARVALHO, DAYANA MARIA DE SOUSA TAVARES, MARIA JULIENE CORDEIRO, JO?O PAULO DA SILVA. TALITA FERNANDES GONCALVES, BRUNO RAMOS FERNANDES, LUIZ HENRIQUE ALVES DAMASCENO, IAGO DA SILVA NOBRE, RITA ANGELA DA SILVA.
2013 May 29
0
Lista aprovados Jequiá da Praia
Lista aprovados Jequi? da Praia: Tesouro: ANA CLEIDE PEREIRA DE VASCONCELOS, LUAN MARINHO DE SOUZA, FRANCISCO LEANDRO FIUSA DA SILVA, PEDRO HENRIQUE ARAUJO SANTIAGO, JO?O CARLOS MOREIRA DE CARVALHO, DANIEL DA CUNHA MAGALHAES, MARIA IVANI DE ARA?JO, JEANNIE PAULO DE SOUSA. SILVANA GALDINO FERREIRA, AUGUSTO BRUNO PEREIRA DOS SANTOS, LUCIANA ESTELITA LAFAYETTE RABELO, GRACY KELLY DE LIMA MORAIS,
2013 May 29
0
[fdo] Lista aprovados Passo de Camaragibe
Lista aprovados Passo de Camaragibe: Chapad?o do Sul: ALINE RAQUEL BEZERRA LEITE, LEANDRO DO NASCIMENTO BATISTA, FERNANDO MONTEIRO DOS SANTOS, NEYLSON CAVALCANTE DOS SANTOS, JO?O CARLOS MOREIRA DE CARVALHO, CLEVILSON PEDRO FONSECA OLIVEIRA, MARIA DE FATIMA ALEIXO PINHEIRO, IVETE CORDEIRO DE SOUZA. SAMILLE DE OLIVEIRA CAVALCANTE, ELIS?NGELA DOS SANTOS SILVA, MAURY DE SIQUEIRA MELO PEREIRA, JOSEFA
2013 May 29
0
Lista aprovados Maravilha
Lista aprovados Maravilha: Amamba?: ANDERSON BEZERRA MOURAO, LUCAS CAULA ALBUQUERQUE, GEILSON HOLANDA SAMPAIO, RAFAEL FERNANDES, JO?O CARLOS MOREIRA DE CARVALHO, DEBORA CRISTINA SCHNORNBERGER, MARIA MACLENE BEZERRA LIMA, JOAO PEDRO TAVARES MAGALHAES. TAMYRES AMORIM SOUZA, CAIO CESAR FERNANDES LOPES, MAGNUN SANTOS FREDERICO, IAGO SIMOES CALIARI, RITA MARIA SILVA ALMEIDA. Pedreiras. Maravilha,
2019 Oct 18
0
Child Domains
Hello, I think you got lots of answers w.r.t. feasibility, but none w.r.t. desirability ("Is this a good practice") ? I?d not do it. Your organization might relocate, or employees might switch locations. This can add a lot of unnecessary confusion for others. What prevents you from having a single domain? Or at least structuring on a criteria that is more relevant in the long run?
2013 May 29
0
Lista dos aprovados em concurso Matriz de Camaragibe
Lista dos aprovados em concurso Matriz de Camaragibe: Ant?nio Jo?o: ADEL?ENNE KIRLEY, JULIANA RODRIGUES ALVES, ERICH DOUGLAS MOREIRA CHAVES, MAYSA RAQUEL DA SILVA, JO?O CARLOS MOREIRA DE CARVALHO, CARLOS ALEXANDRE SILVA DE LIMA, MANOEL LEYVSON MACHADO MATOS, IANN MARZZO SAMPAIO LIBOS. ROBERTO BEZERRA FERREIRA, DIONE MARIA DA SILVA, MARIANA COSTA OLIVEIRA, JORGE ROBERTO PRUDENCIO NASCIMENTO,
2019 Oct 16
2
Child Domains
Thanks, I will start reading today. [image: Logo - ZUP] Thiago Anderson / Analista de Infraestrutura [image: ?cone de e-mail] thiago.santos at zup.com.br [image: ?cone de celular] (34)98857-4909 [image: ?cone de telefone] (34) 3210-8181ZUP IT INNOVATION Avenida Nicomedes Alves dos Santos, 1205, Sala 105 Uberl?ndia - MG Em qua, 16 de out de 2019 ?s 04:43, L.P.H. van Belle via samba < samba at
2007 Jan 19
2
Using users from another samba server
Hello, I currently have a samba server set up as my network PDC (using LDAP as passdb), and I'm trying to set up another linux file server on the network. This file server should allow users to log in based on their passwords on the PDC, however it doesn't need (nor would be appropriate) to be a BDC. How can I set it up to read the remote LDAP? I have already installed libnss-ldap,
2013 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
Bill, Just in case this is relevant for you: If you're working with C++ code, or otherwise have any functions that might throw exceptions, you might also need to catch those exceptions in order to free the allocated memory. This will involve looking for calls to functions that mayThrow(), changing their calls to invokes, and freeing the memory before resuming the unwinding. -Hal -----
2002 Oct 04
0
ITIL in Major Corporations - Has it worked? BREAKFAST SEMINAR - Tue 22/10/02
ITIL in Major Corporations - Has it worked? Speaker: Gerard Blokdijk, Managing Director The Art of Service When: Tuesday 22 October - 7.30am to 9.30am Venue: Regus Citigroup Centre, 2 Park Street, Sydney Cost: $45 including GST Features: Breakfast, Networking. Already over 30 participants - CIO's / (IT) Managers. Register: http://www.artofservicedirect.com click on Enrol, Sydney Events ALSO:
2013 Nov 15
0
[LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
Try breaking the critical edges (-break-crit-edges). This way, a new block will be created between BB13 and BB11 (call this BB11.break) and BB15 and BB12 (call this BB12.break). The predecessors of the dominance frontier will, thus, be BB11.break, BB12.break, and BB14. When we enter through a block with a call to malloc(), we will end up in one of the blocks in the dominance frontier (kind of).
2013 Nov 13
2
[LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
Thanks! I will try that and see whether it works. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Henrique Santos < henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > It seems that placing the calls to free at the predecessors of dominance >> frontier is inadequate. It is possible that there are exit blocks that are >> dominated by BB12 (calls to malloc). I guess we can also insert calls to
2007 Jan 05
1
Problems managing groups with smbldap
Hello, I have added a group on my samba server (which uses LDAP as its backend) using the command: 'smbldap-groupadd -a "DINF - Suporte"' but when I try to add a user into it using 'smbldap-groupmod -m "pr193292" "DINF - Suporte"' I get the following error message: /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupmod: group DINF - Suporte not found! I can see the group on
2013 Nov 04
2
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
On 4 November 2013 08:19, Henrique Santos <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following: > > entry: > result0 = invoke func0 to defer_block unwind landing0 > > landing0: > landingpad > result1 = invoke func1 to defer_block unwind landing1 > > landing1: > landingpad > br
2013 Nov 04
2
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
On 4 November 2013 02:31, Henrique Santos <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > But the incoming value from the landing pad will always be null, won't it? > If so, just iterate through the predecessors and add the terminator as the > incoming value if it's an invoke instruction and add the null value it's > not. > Won't that work? > Note that the
2013 Nov 15
2
[LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
Hi Henrique, I have tried using -mergereturn and inserting a free into the predecessors of dominance frontier of malloc block and it caused double free. It is possible for multiple free's to be inserted on the path from malloc to an exit. For example, in the following CFG: BB10 (malloc) / \ BB11 BB12 ... / \ / \
2013 Nov 04
0
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following: entry: result0 = invoke func0 to defer_block unwind landing0 landing0: landingpad result1 = invoke func1 to defer_block unwind landing1 landing1: landingpad br defer_block defer_block: result = phi [ result0, entry ], [ result1, landing0 ], [ null, landing1 ] ... This doesn't have landing pads with multiple
2013 Nov 04
0
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
If you're talking about the IR, then I don't think so. It seems like perfectly valid. H. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com > wrote: > On 4 November 2013 08:19, Henrique Santos > <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following: > > > >
2013 Nov 10
0
[LLVMdev] Warnings on Opt passes
There was a pretty lengthy discussion on this a few months ago - http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-July/063845.html I think people were mostly for the idea, but I don't know how far, if at all, they implemented these ideas. If the diagnostic/warning capabilities are good enough, I think it'll be an interesting thing to have. Also, Paul Redmond implemented something of the
2007 May 10
0
Problem with ipp2p 0.8.2
Hello Guys ( and girls, if is there any here :) ), I have a box with IPP2P Installed on it (Debian Etch, ipp2p 0.8.2 tarball, iptables 1.3.6 and kernel 2.6.21), and I''ve identified a problem: I use iptables to apply a mark on the traffic that ipp2p classifies as p2p. In my tc rules, I have granted bandwidth to many traffic classes (http, ssh, streaming, games, p2p, etc) and one