Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Samba 4.8.10 for Debian 9 is now available (amd64/i386)"
2019 Apr 08
3
Samba 4.8.11 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Hi everyone,
In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.8.11
that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my
SOHO). Comments most welcomed.
http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.11
If you're on RHEL7/Centos7, you've got several repos to choose from:
http://azzurro.ezplanet.net/el7
2019 Apr 06
2
Samba 4.8.10 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 16:09 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba
> 4.8.10
> that I'm using on RHEL7.6. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for
> my
> SOHO). Comments most welcomed.
>
> http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10
How do you build this on
2019 Apr 08
6
Samba 4.8.10 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
On Sun, 2019-04-07 at 12:38 -0400, vincent at cojot.name wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote:
>
> > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10
> >
> > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle 3.2
> > ?
>
> Hi Sergio,
> that's a very good question. I built these on rhrl7.6 with gnutls-
>
2019 Apr 15
2
cutting corners (4.10.2 on el7.6)
Hi All,
I'm not well versed in the samba code base so I'm asking here.. :)
I only wanted to run a small AD/DC for my SOHO (1 spouse, 3 kids, 1 dog & 1 cat).
I've managed to build 4.10.2 on rhel7.6 with gnutls-3.3.29 and python-2.7.
(this required an updated cmocka, which in turn required an updated cmake)
but...
building without testsuite and without clustering (ctdb) allows
2019 Apr 08
3
Samba 4.8.10 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Adding Alexander (cc'ed, thank you)
Hi Sergio,
I found some hints (dating back almost a year ago) about why gnutls-3.4
might be needed:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-April/127282.html
I don't know how much of this still holds true (I've been running an AD DC
with rhel7's gnutls 3.3.z for over a year without apparent issues).
Regards,
Vincent
On Mon, 8
2019 Dec 11
2
Samba 4.11.3, 4.10.11 and 4.9.17 for Centos7/RHEL7
Hi everyone,
I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.3, 4.10.11 and 4.9.17 for
RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The 4.11 rpms use the python3 and
python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the
same time as the 7.7 version.
Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed.
http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.3
2019 Sep 06
1
Samba 4.10.8 and 4.9.13 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Hi everyone,
In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.10.8
that I'm using on RHEL7.7. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my SOHO).
These rpms use the default python2 from the system.
The 4.10.x SPEC file is now more closely aligned with upstream (Fedora
SPEC file) and I've yet to test these builds using the system's python3 on
RHEL7.
2019 Jul 10
4
Samba 4.10.6 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Hi Konstantin,
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Konstantin Shalygin via samba wrote:
> Vincent, excellent work!
Thank you. Glad it's helping others.
> Can you also provide support for rados vfs (already exists in SPEC) and
> ctdb_mutex_ceph_rados_helper?
That's probably doable but you'd have to BETA-test for me since I don't
have a working ceph cluster at home. The information
2019 Jun 12
2
sssd not a good idea
That's clearly a documentation bug. As for the samba integration, it's now
in its own guide:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/windows_integration_guide/index
(this is what I followed on 7.5/7.6 to consume realmd).
Let me open a BZ about this...
Regards,
Vincent
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 12/06/2019 16:31,
2019 May 20
2
self compiled 4.10.3 replication failure.
On Mon, 20 May 2019, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2019, Tom Diehl via samba wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 18 May 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> Well OK maybe I should have said self compiled using the instructions @
>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Build_Samba_from_Source#configure and
>> the package list from
>>
2020 Aug 21
2
Using Samba AD/DC as an Active Directory OAuth provider for OpenShift
On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 17:51 -0400, Vincent S. Cojot via samba wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
>
> First of all, thank you for taking the time to help me.
> I tried your suggestion and all results came up empty.
>
> Then I did a few lapdsearch(es) and found this:
>
> 1) This query returns two users:
> ldapsearch -H ldaps://dc00.ad.lasthome.solace.krynn:636 -x -W -D
>
2018 May 03
2
unexplained Replication failures...?
Hi all,
I'm running in circles trying to debug replication failures on samba
4.7.6:
dc00 : is a VM on KVM host (attached to a bridge on local LAN)
dc01 : is a similarly configured VM on another KVM host.
I've forcibly demoted and re-promoted dc01 but I still cannot get
automatic replication to work:
root at dc00 ~]# samba-tool drs showrepl
Krynn\DC00
DSA Options: 0x00000001
DSA
2019 Aug 27
2
Samba 4.10.7 and 4.9.12 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Hi everyone,
In case anyone's interested, I've posted the rpm builds of samba 4.10.4
that I'm using on RHEL7.7. (I run these in VMs, serving as AD DCs for my
SOHO). Comments most welcomed.
These rpms use the default python2 from the system.
http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.7
http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.9.12
Regards,
Vincent
2019 Jun 10
6
please confirm: sssd not a good idea :)
On 08/06/2019 21:32, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 08/06/2019 16:24, Uwe Laverenz via samba wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> when you join a linux server to an active directory with "realm" it
>> uses "sssd" as default. This works well as long as you just want to
>> be a simple domain member.
>>
>> As soon as you want a real member
2019 Apr 16
1
cutting corners (4.10.2 on el7.6)
Hi Garming,
Thanks for taking the time to enlighten me. I do happen to have two DC's
and in my limited testing, 4.10.2 seems to function properly as an AD/DC
on el7.6 with the packages I built. As I'm not using those DC's for file
serving in a clustered setup, it is also my interpretation that I can do
without ctdb (this one had a specific requirement for a higher version of
a
2019 Jun 10
3
please confirm: sssd not a good idea :)
On 10/06/2019 16:04, vincent at cojot.name wrote:
>
> There is probably some amount of redtape on this but AFAIK it works
> fine for me: My RHEL7.6 hypervisors are joined to my AD DC 4.10.4 VMs
> through use of realm '(and thus sssd):
>
> Here's a RHEL7.6 client:
> # realm list
> ad.lasthome.solace.krynn
> ? type: kerberos
> ? realm-name:
2020 Mar 20
4
Debian Buster Samba 4.12 (experimental packages) amd64/i386
Hai Guys,
I've uploaded the Debian Buster samba 4.12 packages to the buster-experimental repo.
These need some extra love in tests, so if your able to please these a bit.
And report back to me/the samba list.
ONLY amd64 and i386 Packages. (sorry armhf is still building)
Repo setup.
wget -O - http://apt.van-belle.nl/louis-van-belle.gpg-key.asc | apt-key add -
echo "deb
2019 Apr 08
0
Samba 4.8.10 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 06:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-04-07 at 12:38 -0400, vincent at cojot.name wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote:
> >
> > > > http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10
> > >
> > > How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle
> > > 3.2
>
2019 Jul 08
8
Samba 4.10.6 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Hi everyone,
I've posted some updated source and binary rpms following the release of
updates by the samba project. Updated rpms include samba-4.10.6 and
ldb-1.5.5.
Here are the links:
- http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.6/RHEL7
As usual, these work fine for me (4.10.6) but YMMV. Please do report
issues if you find some.
Regards,
Vincent
2019 Apr 07
0
Samba 4.8.10 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, Sérgio Basto via samba wrote:
>> http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.8.10
> How do you build this on Centos 7 without gnutls 3.4 and nettle 3.2 ?
Hi Sergio,
that's a very good question. I built these on rhrl7.6 with gnutls-3.3.39
and nettle-2.7.1:
[root at dc02 ~]# rpm -q nettle gnutls
nettle-2.7.1-8.el7.x86_64
nettle-2.7.1-8.el7.i686