similar to: Enable XAT_OFFLINE extended attribute in Samba

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:25:59 -0800 Jeremy Allison via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:48:56PM +0100, Andrea Cucciarre' via samba > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Does Samba support XAT_OFFLINE and XAT_ONLINE extended attribute? > > I have enabled "ea support = yes" but it seems to have no effect on > > that.

My goal is to use the Offline file attribute of Windows when sharing with Samba: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.io.fileattributes?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=netframework-4.7.2 It works when I share ZFS filesystem using the native ZFS CIFS sharing, but it fails when I share the same ZFS with Samba, that is the Offline files are not showed in Windows Client Il 3/4/2019

Thanks for the suggestion Jeremy, we are going to build our own module Andrea Il 3/5/2019 8:28 PM, Jeremy Allison ha scritto: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 01:14:00PM +0100, Andrea Cucciarre' wrote: >> My goal is to use the Offline file attribute of Windows when sharing with >> Samba: >> >>

On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 01:14:00PM +0100, Andrea Cucciarre' wrote: > My goal is to use the Offline file attribute of Windows when sharing with > Samba: > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.io.fileattributes?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=netframework-4.7.2 > > It works when I share ZFS filesystem using the native ZFS CIFS sharing, but > it fails when I

Sorry my bad, thanks for spotting it. Should that explains also the failure to grab the mutex? Andrea Il 3/12/2019 12:14 PM, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 12:01:08 +0100 > Andrea Cucciarre' <acucciarre at cloudian.com> wrote: > >> The OS is OmniOS, the DC is Windows Server (not sure about the >> release), and below the smb.conf.

The OS is OmniOS, the DC is Windows Server (not sure about the release), and below the smb.conf. I have also noted that they have more trusted domains, but since they configured ad idmap only for one domain, then all the other domains use tdb idmap [global] client ldap sasl wrapping = plain dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab disable spoolss = yes host msdfs = no idmap config * : backend

Hi all, Back in 2002 I opened a discussion on the samba-technical mailing list regarding the WinNT FILE_ATTRIBUTE_OFFLINE ( http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2002-April/020969.html). Meanwhile some FILE_ATTRIBUTE_OFFLINE handling was implemented in the 'trunk' Samba. Currently (Samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.4) provides the 'dmapi support' option for representing the

Hello, Still fighting on this issue, now sometimes I get the following (may be) relevant errors: [2019/03/18 14:46:03.329505, 10, pid=582, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=idmap] ../source3/winbindd/idmap.c:509(idmap_find_domain)   idmap_find_domain called for domain 'BITINTRA' [2019/03/18 14:46:03.329577, 10, pid=582, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=winbind]

HI Alexander, Thanks for the update. Initially, I also thought of deploying Ceph but ceph is quite difficult to set-up and manage. Moreover, it's also hardware demanding. I think it's most suitable for a very large set-up with hundreds of clients. What do you think of MooseFS ? Have you or anyone else tried MooseFS. If yes, how was its performance?

Hi Guys, We have been using OpenZFS in our HPC environment for quite some time. And OpenZFS was going fine. But we are now running into scalability issues since OpenZFS can't be scaled out. So, I am planning to use Gluster on top of OpenZFS. So, I wanted to know if anyone has tried it. if yes, how it was and any deployment guide for it. We have an HPC environment . Data

I'm not sure I have understood, I'm mounting the share as "urca" user, which is not a known user. Although I'm setting smb.conf so that for guest user it uses the privileges of the known user "andrea" Could you please advice on what I should set for "guest account" in smb.conf? Thanks Andrea Il 1/23/2019 5:15 PM, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto:

The DC is a Windows AD DC. Could you please clarify why i should change setting in the Windows DC instead of the Samba server, which is the one that does the insecure ldap bind? Regards Andrea Cucciarre' On 11/9/2020 3:13 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 09/11/2020 13:28, Andrea Cucciarre' wrote: >> My customer complain that in the AD DC they see the following

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:40:08AM +0530, gagan tiwari wrote: > Hi Guys, > We have been using OpenZFS in our HPC environment for > quite some time. And OpenZFS was going fine. > > But we are now running into scalability issues since OpenZFS can't be > scaled out. Since ZFS is a local FS, you are essentially limited to how much storage you can stick into

Hi, I need to extract the following attributes of a file in Windows share using samba. /* FileAttributesField */ #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY???????? 0x001L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN?????????? 0x002L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_SYSTEM?????????? 0x004L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY??????? 0x010L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_ARCHIVE????????? 0x020L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL?????????? 0x080L

My customer complain that in the AD DC they see the following insecure communication coming from the Samba server (DC member): "The following client performed a SASL (Negotiate/Kerberos/NTLM/Digest) LDAP bind without requesting signing (integrity verification), or performed a simple bind over a cleartext (non-SSL/TLS-encrypted) LDAP connection." So Samba does an insecure LDAP bind and

Am 09.11.20 um 15:42 schrieb cn--- via samba: > What version of Samba is this and do you have "server schannel = no" set > in its smb.conf? It might also be some thing like this option "client ldap sasl wrapping". So it would really help to see the entire smb.conf Regards Christian > > > Regards > > Christian > > Am 09.11.20 um 15:31 schrieb

On 20/04/2020 17:49, Andrea Cucciarre' via samba wrote: > Does the "password server" setting in the smb.conf achieve it? No, you shouldn't use this, you should allow Samba to choose the best DC to use. > > On 4/20/2020 6:40 PM, Andrea Cucciarre' wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is there a way to provide a list of DC that Samba should try to join? >> I

On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 14:44 +0530, gagan tiwari wrote: > HI?Alexander, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Thanks for the update. Initially, I? > also thought of deploying Ceph but ceph is quite difficult to set-up > and manage. Moreover, it's also??hardware demanding. You are of course entitled to your own opinion but I'd like to point out that ZFS+Gluster carries a lot of

Gagan: Throwing my $0.02 in -- It depends on the system environment of how you are planning on deploying Gluster (and/or Ceph). I have Ceph running on my three node HA Proxmox cluster using three OASLOA Mini PCs that only has the Intel N95 Processor (4-core/4-thread) with 16 GB of RAM and a cheap Microcenter store brand 512 GB NVMe M.2 2230 SSD and my Ceph cluster has been running without any

Hello Ralph, thanks for the info. I have find out that "durable handles" should be available in Samba 4.11, and actually it seems to recognize the share option: durable handles = yes Do you know if any other steps are needed to setup that feature, or could you point me any doc that help to achieve that? Regards Andrea Cucciarre' On 12/12/2019 11:04 AM, Ralph Boehme wrote: