similar to: Enable XAT_OFFLINE extended attribute in Samba

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:25:59 -0800 Jeremy Allison via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:48:56PM +0100, Andrea Cucciarre' via samba > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Does Samba support XAT_OFFLINE and XAT_ONLINE extended attribute? > > I have enabled "ea support = yes" but it seems to have no effect on > > that.

My goal is to use the Offline file attribute of Windows when sharing with Samba: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.io.fileattributes?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=netframework-4.7.2 It works when I share ZFS filesystem using the native ZFS CIFS sharing, but it fails when I share the same ZFS with Samba, that is the Offline files are not showed in Windows Client Il 3/4/2019

Thanks for the suggestion Jeremy, we are going to build our own module Andrea Il 3/5/2019 8:28 PM, Jeremy Allison ha scritto: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 01:14:00PM +0100, Andrea Cucciarre' wrote: >> My goal is to use the Offline file attribute of Windows when sharing with >> Samba: >> >>

On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 01:14:00PM +0100, Andrea Cucciarre' wrote: > My goal is to use the Offline file attribute of Windows when sharing with > Samba: > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.io.fileattributes?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=netframework-4.7.2 > > It works when I share ZFS filesystem using the native ZFS CIFS sharing, but > it fails when I

Sorry my bad, thanks for spotting it. Should that explains also the failure to grab the mutex? Andrea Il 3/12/2019 12:14 PM, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 12:01:08 +0100 > Andrea Cucciarre' <acucciarre at cloudian.com> wrote: > >> The OS is OmniOS, the DC is Windows Server (not sure about the >> release), and below the smb.conf.

Hello, Still fighting on this issue, now sometimes I get the following (may be) relevant errors: [2019/03/18 14:46:03.329505, 10, pid=582, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=idmap] ../source3/winbindd/idmap.c:509(idmap_find_domain)   idmap_find_domain called for domain 'BITINTRA' [2019/03/18 14:46:03.329577, 10, pid=582, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=winbind]

The OS is OmniOS, the DC is Windows Server (not sure about the release), and below the smb.conf. I have also noted that they have more trusted domains, but since they configured ad idmap only for one domain, then all the other domains use tdb idmap [global] client ldap sasl wrapping = plain dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab disable spoolss = yes host msdfs = no idmap config * : backend

I'm not sure I have understood, I'm mounting the share as "urca" user, which is not a known user. Although I'm setting smb.conf so that for guest user it uses the privileges of the known user "andrea" Could you please advice on what I should set for "guest account" in smb.conf? Thanks Andrea Il 1/23/2019 5:15 PM, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto:

My customer complain that in the AD DC they see the following insecure communication coming from the Samba server (DC member): "The following client performed a SASL (Negotiate/Kerberos/NTLM/Digest) LDAP bind without requesting signing (integrity verification), or performed a simple bind over a cleartext (non-SSL/TLS-encrypted) LDAP connection." So Samba does an insecure LDAP bind and

Hi all, Back in 2002 I opened a discussion on the samba-technical mailing list regarding the WinNT FILE_ATTRIBUTE_OFFLINE ( http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2002-April/020969.html). Meanwhile some FILE_ATTRIBUTE_OFFLINE handling was implemented in the 'trunk' Samba. Currently (Samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.4) provides the 'dmapi support' option for representing the

The DC is a Windows AD DC. Could you please clarify why i should change setting in the Windows DC instead of the Samba server, which is the one that does the insecure ldap bind? Regards Andrea Cucciarre' On 11/9/2020 3:13 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 09/11/2020 13:28, Andrea Cucciarre' wrote: >> My customer complain that in the AD DC they see the following

Hi, I need to extract the following attributes of a file in Windows share using samba. /* FileAttributesField */ #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY???????? 0x001L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN?????????? 0x002L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_SYSTEM?????????? 0x004L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY??????? 0x010L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_ARCHIVE????????? 0x020L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL?????????? 0x080L

Am 09.11.20 um 15:42 schrieb cn--- via samba: > What version of Samba is this and do you have "server schannel = no" set > in its smb.conf? It might also be some thing like this option "client ldap sasl wrapping". So it would really help to see the entire smb.conf Regards Christian > > > Regards > > Christian > > Am 09.11.20 um 15:31 schrieb

On 20/04/2020 17:49, Andrea Cucciarre' via samba wrote: > Does the "password server" setting in the smb.conf achieve it? No, you shouldn't use this, you should allow Samba to choose the best DC to use. > > On 4/20/2020 6:40 PM, Andrea Cucciarre' wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is there a way to provide a list of DC that Samba should try to join? >> I

I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? Although btrfs is making progress, ZFS is far more mature, has a few more stable features (especially Raid-z3) and has worked flawlessly for me on CentOS-6 and Scientific Linux-6.

> > > OK, plese note that I am not willing to tolerate anti-oss claims and will > continue to correct similar false claims. If you don't like those > discussions > at all, you should try to avoid false claims and the need for corrections. > If I were RedHat, including a non GPL filesystem into my operating system would make me sweat a bit. Intel were facing a similar

Hello Ralph, thanks for the info. I have find out that "durable handles" should be available in Samba 4.11, and actually it seems to recognize the share option: durable handles = yes Do you know if any other steps are needed to setup that feature, or could you point me any doc that help to achieve that? Regards Andrea Cucciarre' On 12/12/2019 11:04 AM, Ralph Boehme wrote:

Yes, I saw that they are different I was just willing to test something similar. Actually, I'm searching for a Samba feature that allow transparent failover, or continuos availablity in a cluster setup (Samba + ctbd + gluster) Based on the following link my understanding is that such feature is not currently available in Samba:

Hello, I'm trying to configure a Samba server for SMB sharing with Persistent Handles. I have viewed the youtube? video https://youtu.be/fA78hdeYi6k However, it's not clear to me how to enable it in Samba, and if any setting is needed in smb.conf (I have already set up Samba, gluster and ctdb) I'm running Samba 4.11.. Could you please advice? -- Regards Andrea Cucciarre'

I have a solution (actually a few) to this problem, but none are computationally efficient enough to be useful. I'm hoping someone can enlighten me to a better solution. I have data frame of chromosome/position pairs (along with other data for the location). For each pair I need to determine if it is with in a given data frame of ranges. I need to keep only the pairs that are within any of