similar to: Samba 4 File Locking

Hi all, I've been looking for an answer for this issue but Google didn't help. So I resource to the next best thing: the Samba mailing list. Question: Is there a way to automaticaly, after a certain amount of time, unlock a file after, for example, a client crash or network problem? I know how to do it manually of course, but that is, well, cumbersome. I've looked at

James Wright <12wrigja at gmail.com> 9:56 PM (13 minutes ago) to samba Hi Samba users, I have a Samba server with a single share backed by a ZFS pool / collection of datasets. I can correctly navigate around the share, but the free space reporting within clients is inaccurate for various directories, especially those that are themselves setup as datasets in ZFS and have quota applied to

Ah, a workaround! I'd seen something like this on an old thread but I've always tried to stay away from socket options. I'll give these a try. Thanks for your help P.S.: strange that I don't see more people "complaining" about this.... Best regards, Carlos Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de> escreveu no dia quinta, 14/02/2019 à(s) 05:38: > On Thu,

> Am 23.02.2019 um 22:23 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >>>>> He also has these: >>>>> >>>>> idmap config * : rangesize = 1000000 >>>>> idmap config * : range = 1000000-19999999 >>>>> idmap config * : backend = autorid >>>>> >>>>> The '*' domain

Hi there, I use Samba 4.9 since its releaseday and also had some troubles first due to the lack of informations in the wiki. Anyways... after some try & error i got it working and since i run the Cluster (non-production environment) had no errors except CTDBs monitoring of the Samba process did'nt work as i would expect it (RPC-Server was dead but CTDB did'nt complain and "ctdb

On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 23:32:30 +0100 William Edwards via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Joachim, > > > Op 15 feb 2024 om 23:09 heeft Joachim Lindenberg via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > > > > ?Hi Rowland, > > No, I don?t have so many devices yet. > > Rowland believes that one should not use IPv6

On 25.02.2019 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:24:24 +0100 > Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >>>> I'm confused.. how is the choice of the idmap backend related to an >>>> AD DC use case? >>> Only in the case of wanting the same ID everywhere. >> In my understanding, the

Hello, is it possible to configure Samba that only check User+Password is OK on a Active Directory Server ´s ( No Domain Join of the Samba Server) ? Thanks Dennis

This was a test on debian Jessie with sernet samba 4.2.3. and the test was, "login" with a AD user on ssh. this worked, fine, but this i noticed later. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: Volker Lendecke [mailto:Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE] >Verzonden: woensdag 26 augustus 2015 20:39 >Aan: L.P.H. van Belle >CC: samba at lists.samba.org

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:03:21AM +0300, Владимир Терентьев wrote: > Hi. Try add this to your config in global section. > > socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_RCVBUF=262140 > SO_SNDBUF=262140 Sorry to step in, but SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF are almost always bad for performance, unless you know *EXACTLY* what you're doing at a packet level. A general

Hi Volker, Reaching to RedHat is not the option for me right now, could you please tell me are there any configuration parameters in smb.conf which will avoid issuing NULL or Anonymous connections or sessions. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:49 AM, Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de > wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:12:07PM +0530, Shashi Kanth Boddula via samba > wrote:

Hi all, I have a debian jessie server with sernet samba 4.2.8 installed. The problem is when I try to delete a folder with content at the same time that a client is selecting the same folder. In the first client give the error because of the file is in use(the folder) but deletes all the content and in a second time with the folder empty I can delete the folder fine. I have other problem but I

Hi Everyone, I have Samba server 3.5.10 running on RHEL 5.8 platform and it has joined to our AD domain controller. Recently my Windows guys has done some changes to AD Security by stating " CIFS Null Session Vulnerability Fix via GPO - Security Requirement". After this change, my windows clients are not authenticating with domain credentials while accessing the shares, but nothing has

Good day I would like to setup a SMB file server and DC that uses IPv4 and IPv6 dual stack. However I see certain problems; for instance, when the IPv6 prefix is dynamic, this means the IPv6 of the DC would also dynamically change. Is there something special I should consider when provisioning a SAMBA AD DC with IPv6, or will it "just work" ? Thanks, best Tobias

Hello, > As far as I understood you are using ldapsam only when Samba is running as > AD domain controller. it is only a standalone server, no sid/gid (mapping) needed. All users and groups are local (passwd/groups) maintained. We only want to authenticate the users against the ldap server (openDJ). No Active Directory is used. But if I configure, there are a lot (to much) ldap

The directory is small, it contains only one file. stat() takes 15ms and if I read 1000 files it sums to 15 seconds. So the issue is really that open file is synchronous. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:44:57PM +0200, Peter Bulin wrote: > > Hi, > > I need to to open existing readonly files. Yes you are

2016-06-02 8:48 GMT+02:00 Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de>: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:44:26PM +0000, Seth Goldin wrote: > > I disabled client signing from the client side, via OS X's global > nsmb.conf > > file: https://discussions.apple.com/message/30282470#30282470 > > > > The performance was back to over 600 MB/s, as compared to 60 MB/s

Hi everyone I have a four node samba/CTDB cluster exporting CIFS shares from a GPFS 3.5 cluster. Samba/CTDB is at 4.2.3: [root at hostname ~]# rpm -qa | grep sernet sernet-samba-ad-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-libs-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-common-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-ctdb-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-client-4.2.3-18.el6.x86_64

I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled the latest Samba 4.3 tarball and enabled fruit per the modules man page, however directory listing performance still takes a few seconds. I've cranked the fruit debug level up to 10 and can see that it is getting used ("fruit_stat called for

Good afternoon, I have many AIX clients running samba from pware. I want to move to either the version on the AIX expansion pack or the rpm's IBM suggests we download, https://www-01.ibm.com/marketing/iwm/iwm/web/reg/pick.do?source=aixbp&lang=en_US The problem is that the samba version from pware that is working is old and I don't see the pware downloads anymore to upgrade to a