similar to: Samba 4.x to 4.9 upgrade and bind DLZ dns.

Alright, I'm taking the plunge: We're switching our three AD DCs from Samba internal to BIND_DLZ back end. I needed a version of BIND with DLZ, as it appears support for that is not so ubiquitous. I went here first: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Using_BIND_DLZ_backend_with_secured_/_signed_DNS_updates We use Ubuntu 14.04 here, and the Debian/Ubuntu instructions fail on apt-get

yes i realized that there is something wrong with BIND9_FLATFILE while encountering with samba_upgradedns -h which doesn't show BIND9_FLATFILE Any help on*drs repl* not working i think it is pointing to wrong FQDN how do i correct that ? > >/ Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) > />/ > />/ > />/ [root at dc2

Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend# Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)

> > You are using Bind9 with flatfiles, this is NOT recommended. > If you are using the standard Ubuntu Bind9 package, you should be using > BIND9_DLZ and this stores the dns info in AD. > How did you provision the DC, was it with 'BIND9_FLATFILE' or > 'BIND9_DLZ' ? > If it was the later, just remove the 'wie' zone and its reverse zone > from the

Hi, I have updated my DC's to Samba 4.10.7, but I still can't add a new DC to the domain. I believe the problem is with Samba Internal DNS. So I would like to convert my DNS from Internal DNS to Bind9_DLZ of the production DC's. Then I will join a new DC to the domain to see if it works. I checked the tutorials: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_BIND_DNS_Server

Hi, I'm folowing the tutorial: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End But, the follows file there isn't in my DC, so can I to create it manually? /usr/local/samba/bind-dns/named.conf file and uncomment the module for your BIND version. For example: dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND 9.10 database "dlopen

Hai? ? Im running:?debian wheezy, sernet samba 4.1.3 , DC, in windows 2008 AD domain. ? Im reading the wiki and i stumbled on this. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns-backend_bind? semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone.jnl the strange thing is, and this is

Hi Team, Samba Version = 4.2 Bind = 9.10 with dlz Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) [root at dc2]# samba-tool drs showrepl (want to highlight the name which is using to connect) ERROR(<class 'samba.drs_utils.drsException'>): DRS connection to *dc2.ik.lan.mum* failed - drsException: DRS connection to dc2.ik.lan.mum failed: (-1073741772, 'The

Hi, Failed to change DNS: samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information DNS accounts already exist No zone file /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/dns/EMPRESA.COM.BR.zone DNS records will be automatically created DNS partitions already exist Adding dns-samba4-dc1 account Failed to create link /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab -> /var/lib/samba/bind-d ns/dns.keytab: No such file or

On 2015-08-21 16:30, John Gardeniers wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I wonder if I'm missing the file because I only did a classicupgrade, > rather than a provision and perhaps then the file(s) is/are not > created. > > regards, > John > > > On 21/08/15 13:45, Brady, Mike wrote: >> On 2015-08-21 14:11, Brady, Mike wrote: >>> On 2015-08-21 12:52, John

> So, you are using Samba without problem, it is just that when you try > to use Bind9 instead of the internal dns server, your problems start. > > Let's just recap > > You have run 'samba_upgradedns' > You have altered smb.conf > You have configured 'named.conf' correctly > The Samba 'named.conf' file is readable by 'named' (this

Hi, >No, you shouldn't have to, have you followed this first: I followed, but there are instructions in this tutorial to configure Bind9_DLZ first, as below: - Set up and configure the BIND9_DLZ back end. For details, see BIND9_DLZ Back End <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End>. > What version of Samba is this ? Samba 4.10.7 >Yours will probably

I am trying to setup samba to use the bind9 backend, but a folder is missing in Samba, according to the WIKI page. This seems to be consistent, as there are several files and folders that are not where they should be, according to the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End That page says there should be a folder at /usr/local/samba/bind-dns, but it's not there. I've

Dear all, I have a few question regarding to DNS and upgrading from Samba 4.1.17 to 4.4.2. After reading about the Badlock Bug, I feel the urge to upgrade my Samba installation and to move from BIND9_FLATFILE to SAMBA_INTERNAL_DNS. I am using Samba version 4.1.17. During provisioning (some years ago) I have decided to use BIND9_FLATFILE. At this moment I would like to upgrade to Samba 4.4.2 and

> > I have been doing a bit of investigation and I 'think' we do have a tool > ;-) > Gooooooooddd!! :-) > If you examine 'samba_upgradedns', at the top it says this: > # Upgrade DNS provision from BIND9_FLATFILE to BIND9_DLZ or SAMBA_INTERNAL > I think if you use it to upgrade to either BIND_DLZ or SAMBA_INTERNAL, > it should create the required AD

I'm having trouble with nsupdates.  I'm getting TKEY is unacceptable. I'm using Fedora 29, with its packages: [root at dc2 kwhite]# rpm -qa | grep samba samba-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-dc-bind-dlz-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-common-4.9.4-1.fc29.noarch samba-libs-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-dc-libs-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-winbind-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-common-libs-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64

On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:09:44 +0100 Král Gergely via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > 2018-12-31 20:50 időpontban L.P.H. van Belle via samba ezt írta: > > Can you try to upgrade to any 4.8 version then to 4.9.4? > > might work, atleast my guess this will have a better chance get > > passed this bug. > > > > I can confirm that an upgrade to 4.7.3 to

It is part of the Sernet packages and is currently on 1.3.4 /usr/lib64/samba/libldb.so.1.3.4 We started using sernet-samba-ad from v4 using the internal dns and updated as versions were released. We have now recently updated from 4.8.2 to 4.8.3 and still using internal dns. Our DNS is working as it should, it's only been since recently that we have to migrate to bind9. On Mon, Jul 30, 2018

Hello! Yes already tried this, both he always says that the account already exists even if it does not exist, it affects only dicamicas entries, entries staticas work and replication as well, but as dynamic are troubled by instances in Multiple Sites will have problems ... But some log or command that can help? Thanks Em 30-12-2015 18:38, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 30/12/15 19:57,

> On 2 Jan 2019, at 22:43, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 19:35:04 +0000 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:09:44 +0100 >> Král Gergely via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> 2018-12-31 20:50 időpontban L.P.H. van Belle