similar to: AD-DC Bind: TKEY is unacceptable

On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 12:53, Michal Prívozník <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 4/23/19 11:56 PM, Sukrit Bhatnagar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have compiled and installed libvirt from git checkout > > and started libvirtd service. The version is 5.3.0 and > > I have done system-wide installation. > > > > When I do a `virsh list`, I get the

dahdi built fine on 5.1.20, but on 5.2.7: ............. CC [M] /home/asterisk/rpmbuild/BUILD/linux-dade6ac/drivers/dahdi/vpmadt032_loader/dahdi_vpmadt032_loader.o SHIPPED /home/asterisk/rpmbuild/BUILD/linux-dade6ac/drivers/dahdi/vpmadt032_loader/vpmadt032_x86_64.o LD [M] /home/asterisk/rpmbuild/BUILD/linux-dade6ac/drivers/dahdi/dahdi_vpmadt032_loader.o Building modules, stage 2.

Hello all this morning i followed wiki in subject to replicate my active directory, but it fails with this error: [root at dc1 etc]#  samba-tool drs showrepl Default-First-Site-Name\DC1 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: 8ba457e4-815d-4bd3-a748-8b5ddb53fd5f DSA invocationId: 834770f4-c5a7-48c7-bc77-66e2cf37e557 ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=lxcerruti,DC=com        

On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: > >>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>> >>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>> is some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the >>> top levels: FQDN

On 18.07.2016 22:48, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 18.07.2016 um 11:45 schrieb Norbert Hanke: >> On 18.07.2016 01:52, Achim Gottinger wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 18.07.2016 um 01:02 schrieb Norbert Hanke: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, >>>> both with

On 18.07.2016 20:10, Rowland penny wrote: > On 18/07/16 00:02, Norbert Hanke wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, >> both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version >> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >> >> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its >>

Thank you Denis and Rowland - I didn't realise this was the script, makes sense now. I've run it (on dc2) and it gets as far as: need update: SRV _ldap._tcp.mysite._sites.ForestDnsZones.mydomain.org.uk dc2.mydomain.org.uk 389 [lots of updates needed] 10 DNS updates and 0 DNS deletes needed Successfully obtained Kerberos ticket to DNS/dc1.mydomain.org.uk as DC2$ and then it fails here:

On 18.07.2016 01:52, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 18.07.2016 um 01:02 schrieb Norbert Hanke: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, >> both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version >> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >> >> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update

Hello, I tried to install guestfish on my Fedora 29 and used the commands from documentation sudo dnf install libguestfs-tools but I got an error when I tried to execute run. You will find below logs below: ************************************************************ * IMPORTANT NOTICE * * When reporting bugs, include the COMPLETE, UNEDITED * output

Hello all- I am trying to upgrade a old domain to a newer version. The old DCs are a custom compiled version of Samba, so instead of upgrading the DCs in place, the plan is to upgrade by joining new DCs to the domain, replicating data and then shutting down the old ones after transferring the FSMO roles. I had the new DC (dc3, version 4.9.4-12) replicating to the other DCs (dc0, versions

I installed two virtual machines with Samba as domain controllers for the same domain. I was struggling with network and DNS configuration initially, maybe my problem is related. DC1 starts up ok, the last line of the log reads STATUS=daemon 'samba' finished starting up and ready to serve connections DC2 starts with plenty of lines [2016/05/15 22:00:32.744910, 0]

Hi Rowland I read the threads suggested by Louis (thanks Louis ! ) . As far as I understand , there could be a DNS issue between 4.8.x and 4.9.x. I will try at least to add a new 4.7.12 DC to the domain (the only one current DC is 4.6.7) and check everything is ok . (I take the 4.7.12 because I guess It is the most stable in the 4.7.x branch , am I right ?) . After that , I may try to

Hello, I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results in "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. Both systems are set

Hi everyone, I'm testing with a Samba4 AD network, and I have some problems with DNS on the second DC, with which I could use a bit of your help. I have an AD with two DC's, both Samba 4.2.3. On the first DC, samba_dnsupdate works fine. With stock 4.2.3 I get the error "TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure" but the DNS updates succeed anyway, and after applying

I'm having trouble with OpenSSH 3.1 on an OpenBSD 2.8 box. I apply the patch (the second patch, date/time March 7 12:41 GMT) and I can't connect to it from any other box using Version 1 protocols. I get this: (collector1 is an OpenBSD 3.0 box running OpenSSH 3.1) [kwhite at collector1 kwhite]$ ssh -1 -v scooby.local OpenSSH_3.1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f debug1:

Hi Mathias, Once more: Thanks for your support and guidance! Actually I reconfigured only the first DC initially, assuming that the second join asks me as does the initial one - wrong assumption. My take is the tools could be improved, e.g. : join of DC2 adds DNS record of DC2 to DC1 and verifies it is replicated before claiming success... looking in all the tools and logs for errors is tedious at

On 10.03.2015 20:20, Rowland Penny wrote: > > OK, the first will not work (well not yet), the second should, I > take it you ran 'kinit Administrator at AD.DILKEN.EU' as root before > the join ? > > You could try 'net ads join -U Administrator' and enter the > password when prompted, I personally have never seen the point in > using kerberos during the

On 10/12/15 15:13, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 10.12.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> >>>>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, >>>>> just again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>>>> >>>>> If I go through the DNS

L.P.H. van Belle writes: > check the rights on : > /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab 640 root:bind > /var/lib/samba/private/dns 750 root:bind > /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d 750 root:bind I'm using the internal DNS on both DC's, so I guess bind access rights aren't the issue. Thanks for your answer though :) Regards, Roel > >-----Oorspronkelijk

Oh, I have a pair of samba-4.1.17-DC's, raspberry-pi and dc2 to which make the domain ad.dilken.eu on site Neuoetting. resolv.conf points to the two dc's: search ad.dilken.eu nameserver 192.168.2.33 nameserver 192.168.2.2 In the output I find some relations to dc2 resp. 192.168.2.2, but perhaps it doesn't work as expected.. Greetings Am 10.03.2015 um 21:23 schrieb Rowland Penny: