similar to: UID provided by rid idmap is out of the range imposed in smb.cof

On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:57:06 +0100 Andrea Cucciarre' via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I had a problem with Samba winbind id-mapping  on a system that is > part of an AD domain. > In the smb.conf I have the following setting: > > idmap config <domain> : backend = rid > idmap config <domain> : range = 1000000-3000000 > idmap

On 12/07/16 21:46, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: > > Note: This working because I had to change all the permissions and the > files were left with various "waste" of old permissions. > > > Thanks > > > Em 12-07-2016 17:44, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >> >> Hello! >> Sorry for the confusion this where SERVER is SERVERAD(right) >> At the

I'm reading the man page for idmap_rid over and over and I can't understand it. I think it needs a rewrite so a normal user can understand. Using a practical example. Step 1: determine the highest UID in use for your /etc/passwd file (can we assume everyone has a passwd file?) Step 2: I don't know... Optionally at this point, document how to plug that into the formula RID = ID +

Hi, no, that's my fault. I changed the UIDs and user names in my "ls -l" to unpersonalized/example data for my mail and didn't think about putting these values into the range. A better unpersonalized data example would look like: ---------- drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\group  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\group  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2

Am 21.08.2017 um 15:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:43:00 +0200 > Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Am 21.08.2017 um 15:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:56:50 +0200 >>> Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi,

> > > > Is 'idmap rid' a better choice than ad? Can I still copy files with > > rsync in that case or will file ownership be mangled? > > Quantify better ? > One isn't really better than the other, they are both usable, but in > different ways and reasons. > It might help if you read this: > >

Hi, I have been struggling with this for a few days and think that now's the time I can ask for help :) It's not an area I have delved into before, so I have been trying to follow the documentation, do my own research, and do as much configuration/testing as I can myself; but I am now confused. (I am running 4.2.0 throughout). I have successfully set up and configured a member server

Le 14/01/2018 à 15:51, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:53:15 +0100 > Yvan Masson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> For a new samba domain, I need to create users and groups with Unix >> UIDs and GIDs. >> >> In the future, it is possible that there will be a trust with other >> domains, so

Can return old id, returning the old values (changed the most at least two months) idmap config *: backend = tdb idmap config *:range = 5000-16777216 idmap config SERVERAD: backend = rid idmap config SERVERAD: range = 5000-33554431 The error parrou also, but I think the fact that a group with the same ID / GID if the User to the fact that the idmap values be crossing, even so I changed them

Hello, I have just realized that winbind rid idmapping create the following idmapping for user, below an example: # id HYPERFILE\\simone *uid=11663*(HYPERFILE\simone) gid=10513(HYPERFILE\domain users) groups=10513(HYPERFILE\domain users),*11663*(HYPERFILE\simone),3011(BUILTIN\users) I'm confused about group mapping 11663(HYPERFILE\simone), winbind created a mapping for a group that has

Hi, I don't think that rid backend will work, because when we start samba (samab 2.2.8a) lower uid was 1000, but when we moved to samba 4, power uid was put to 10000. That's mean new user and group use uidNUmber or groupNUmber > 10000. But we have old account and group with uid or gid < 10000 regards Stéphane Purnelle "samba" <samba-bounces at

Hi, A account created with samba3/ldap (created before 2014-02-20): SID: S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-3216 UidNumber : 1108 A account created with Users and computers (samba 4 AD DC) SID: S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-5878 uidNumber : 10023 My actual config (in file-server) : idmap config XXXXXX:backend = ad idmap config XXXXXX:schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config

On 14/06/16 16:16, Juan Ignacio wrote: > Sorry, this is the Domain Member smb.con > Im using Debian last version. > Samba compiled from the sources. > > [global] > netbios name = XXXXX > security = ADS > workgroup = XXXXXX > realm = XXXXXXX > > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > log level = 1 > > # idmap

On 09/08/2019 18:13, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 09.08.19 um 12:49 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 09/08/2019 10:33, Pisch Tam?s via samba wrote: >>>> You have to give any users you require visible on Unix a uidNumber >>>> attribute >>> Ok, I can do it with samba-tool user edit... > I think my rsnapshot-issue corresponds with this

Hello, I've inherited a set of servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.9. They have some variant of samba 3.3 on them (e.g. Version 3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2). These servers are using Samba and Winbind as a way to bind to our Active Directory environment as domain members. We also have a domain member file server running the following: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.6

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:22:36 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists at xunil.at> wrote: > Am 2017-07-11 um 12:16 schrieb Rowland Penny: > > > Try running this: > > > > ldbsearch -H /path/to/sam.ldb -b "dc=secret,dc=at" -s sub > > "(&(objectclass=user)(uidnumber=11029))" > > > > This will check if it is a user. >

Hello, Still fighting on this issue, now sometimes I get the following (may be) relevant errors: [2019/03/18 14:46:03.329505, 10, pid=582, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=idmap] ../source3/winbindd/idmap.c:509(idmap_find_domain)   idmap_find_domain called for domain 'BITINTRA' [2019/03/18 14:46:03.329577, 10, pid=582, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=winbind]

Okay, so I've now read 'man idmap_rid'. It states that the use of the base_rid parameter is deprecated, so does that change ID formula to this? ID = RID + LOW_RANGE_ID Assuming that the default value for the now-deprecated base_rid is 0. Following the example on the man page, I am going to try this: idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * :range = 1000000-1999999 idmap

Thank you for reply Rowland. Sorry for my typo. I intended to change sm--to-->test but i forget to change other lines. So my original config is below: workgroup = sm > realm = sm.pvt > server string = %h Test Host > security = ads > encrypt passwords = yes > idmap config sm.pvt : backend = ad > idmap config sm.pvt :

You are using idmap module rid for your domain. I think getent passwd could not resolve anything because of your id range. I would try a range of 1000 (one thousand)-99999 and see what happens. New users in AD start with a rid of 1000. Well known Users like administrator got their rid starting in the 500 range. You should think of using rfc2307. Regards Tim Am 12. Februar 2015 10:51:47 MEZ,