similar to: KIX script

Hi Group, We use a simple logon script to map drives for our users. If we put the following line: net use /delete * /yes then no drives are mapped on the workstations. If we rem it out, the script works fine. Full script below: net use /delete * /yes net use e: \\server5\peachtree net use w: \\server5\contract_maintenance net use t: \\server5\fleet net use x: \\server5\allusers net use u:

Running SAMBA 2.2.7a compiled with Audit support, enabled on a share: [global] workgroup = HCAT server string = Samba Server for HCAT hosts allow = xxx.xxx. yyy.yyy.yyy. load printers = no log file = /var/log/log.%m max log size = 50 security = user encrypt passwords =

Hi Louis, Just an update on this. I ran up a new test LXC container and completely removed apparmor. Then install the packages. I got the same errors I thought I would change the DNS from Bind to internal and back to bind. The following is going from Bind9 to Internal root at server5-ad:/var/log# service bind9 stop root at server5-ad:/var/log# systemctl mask bind9 Created symlink

Hi Louis, Thank you for that I have made the changes as per below , some items might have duplicated. I then reload apparmor restarted the samba-ad-dc and bind9 services and get the same issue. Every time the forward DNS update works but the reverse doesn't I found a really interesting samba post going back 2017 re the DHCP and DNS

Hi, We have a Samba AD domain with an Ubuntu 16 box as the AD DC . We then promoted a Windows 2008R2 box as a DC. The DNS zone/data in the Samba AD gets replicated to the Windows DC. However, when we try to add a host entry in Windows DNS, we get the message The host record abcd.LIN.GROUP cannot be created. Refused. When we try to create the same in the Samba AD box, it works. The DNS backend

Hai, You posted the correct things here, for a quick fix i I'm buzzy with something else atm but i saw that /dev/urandom part. Add in the bind9 (named) apparmor profile # Samba DLZ /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/bind9/*.so rm, /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/gensec/*.so rm, /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/ldb/*.so rm, /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/ldb/modules/ldb/*.so rm,

Samba version 3.0.9 on Red Hat 9.0 workstations: NT 4.0 SP6 When I took over this project, there were two domains connected by a VPN. For reasons that I'm unable to understand, some new users wound up with the intended domain of SATA and some wound up in SATB (even though they joined the SATA domain. Recently, all kinds of problems have materialized and the only thing I can find wrong is

Hi Guys, Thank you for your emails. Here is the info /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.dhcp /etc/dhcp/ r, /etc/dhcp/** r, /etc/dhcpd{,6}.conf r, /etc/dhcpd{,6}_ldap.conf r, /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh ix, /bin/grep rix, /usr/sbin/samba rix, /usr/bin/gawk rix, /bin/hostname rix, /usr/bin/wbinfo rix, /usr/bin/heimtools rix, /usr/bin/logger rix, /usr/bin/kinit.heimdal rix, /bin/date rix, /dev/tty

Hi Rowland, Just as a test, I installed the dhcp server in the DC ( in the lab). Then configured the dhcp as per the wiki This is what I see. And again the forward zone update despite the errors but the reverse doesn't When releasing the lease Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: Release: IP: 192.168.14.198 Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: execute_statement argv[0] =

On the server with the dhcp script. apt install krb5-user Should be sufficient, then try again. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Praveen Ghimire [mailto:PGhimire at sundata.com.au] > Verzonden: donderdag 4 juli 2019 8:39 > Aan: 'L.P.H. van Belle'; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: RE: [Samba] Reverse DNS > > Hi Louis, > >

Hai, A few things to add/check. For that test with that pc: this part from the previous mail. Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: Release: IP: 192.168.14.198 Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: execute_statement argv[0] = /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: execute_statement argv[1] = delete Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: execute_statement

Hi, We have some issue with the reverse DNS in Samba AD. We're running Bind9_DLZ on Ubuntu 18.04. The DHCP server(Ubuntu 16.04) is different to the AD server and not in the same AD domain. The DHCP scope points to the Samba AD server as the DNS server When a machine with DHCP assigned address tries to update the DNS record, it is able to update the forward zone but not the reverse zone. The

Hello list First and foremost to any developers listening - thank you for Samba - it is just brilliant. Apologies - this is a long post... I am not getting complaints about logon problems from users but I have noticed in /var/log/httpd/error_log, entries like the following for a few users when their logon scripts map drives to shares. Looking back I can see that it has been

Hi Well we are now using HP instead of Dell and have hit a major hurdle. We dont seem to be able to kix any of these boxes. I have been most recently trying on a dl585 and the issue appears to be that the kix kernel does not detect any nic. Its strange as the box can be installed using iso's and the nic appears as eth0: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5706 1000Base-T (A2) PCI-X 64-bit 100MHz

Hi all, In trying to upgrade Samba here, I have built various versions from 3.0.11 to 3.0.14a using various versions of gcc and the Sun compiler (this is on Solaris SPARC) and had the following problem in all cases. Running the built samba as a logon server, I find that WinXP clients work fine but Win9X clients have some difficulties. The problem is that the Win9X logon script can't

On Sun, 5 May 2019 00:11:40 +1000 Rob Thoman via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > We migrated the domain to AD on a ubuntu 18.04 box with samba 4.7.6. > The DNS backend is DLZ > > We are seeing DNS issues as per below > > When using dnsupdate we get the following error. The server can > resolve the hostname(itself) > > added interface

Forgot to mention that this is on Centos 8. So maybe something different than this: https://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg163085.html Regards Christian Am 16.04.20 um 13:45 schrieb Christian Naumer via samba: > Hello alAl, > after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the > vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs > from the

Hello. Today a box I manage throwed a lot of these (Samba 4.3.3 working as an ADS member on FreeBSD 10.1/amd64): > Mar 7 15:18:54 xxxxxx smbd_audit[51710]: connect to service xxxxxxxxx by user XXXXXXXX\xxxxxxxx > Mar 7 15:18:54 xxxxxx smbd_audit[51710]: open XXXXXXXXX/XXXXXXXXX.ods (fd 9) > Mar 7 15:18:54 xxxxxx smbd_audit[51710]: [2016/03/07 15:18:54.364808, 0]

hello I'm using Samba 3.0.21b-2 on RHEL4.1. All the machines are logging to a windows 2003 ADS domain server. The samba server is a ADS member of this windows 2k3 server and user's access log is recorded by using the audit module. I recently came into this trouble, when I connect to samba server from client, the smbd_audit suddenly got panic. Please advise me how to solve this

Hello alAl, after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs from the crash see here: .0.31:445] Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: [2020/04/16 13:36:47.546559, 0] ../../source3/lib/util.c:830(smb_panic_s3) Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: PANIC (pid 6263): vfs_full_audit.c: name table