Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "in reply to samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset, - open: error=2 (No such file or directory)"
2018 Sep 11
0
samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset, - open: error=2 (No such file or directory)
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 01:16:16 +0100
> niya via samba <samba at lists.samba.org <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>> wrote:
>
> >/hi everyone />//>/installed and joined a second dc following the instructions at />/https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory
> />/both version are 4.8.2 />/when i try
2018 Sep 11
2
samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset, - open: error=2 (No such file or directory)
hi everyone
installed and joined a second dc following the instructions at
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory
both version are 4.8.2
when i try to reset t the Sysvol folder's file system access control
lists on the new dc
i get the following error
sudo samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset
open: error=2 (No such file or directory)
ERROR(runtime):
2015 Oct 03
3
Erro samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset/sysvolcheck
Hi I'm with this problem?
Version: Samba 4.3 (4.2 upgrade)
S.O .: Ubuntu 4.14
samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset
open: error=2 (No such file or directory)
ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741823, 'Undetermined error')
File
"/opt/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line
175, in _run
return self.run(*args, **kwargs)
File
2019 Apr 17
2
strange gpo behaviour
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:29:19 +0100
Sérgio Basto via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> My experience was :
>
> 1. Mit kbr doesn't support it, we need to use the old kbr system.
Do not use MIT, it is, at best, experimental.
> 2. We need disable selinux , selinux permissive is not enough to allow
> to write on shared folder sysvol. it cause crashes on windows.
2019 Jul 18
0
Syncing sysvol -> samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset?
On 18/07/2019 14:11, Jonathan Hunter via samba wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 17:58, Rowland penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>> On 17/07/2019 17:43, Kris Lou via samba wrote:
>>> I had thought that the conventional wisdom was that ntacl sysvolreset
>>> should be mostly avoided once relative stability achieved and additional
>>>
2019 Apr 18
0
strange gpo behaviour
On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 18:56 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:29:19 +0100
> Sérgio Basto via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > My experience was :
> >
> > 1. Mit kbr doesn't support it, we need to use the old kbr system.
>
> Do not use MIT, it is, at best, experimental.
>
> > 2. We need disable selinux
2019 Apr 13
2
ntacl sysvolreset - errors / patch?
Hi,
I am finally revisiting my sysvol share (GPOs haven't been working for
me for quite some time) and trying to get permissions sorted properly
on it.
For many years, "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset" has always failed for
me with errors that I have been unable to solve. Previously I have
used guidance from Louis and got things working, but my sysvol is
currently in a broken state.
2017 Nov 13
2
Setting up Second Samba DC samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset fails
Hi Rowland
I removed the winbind lines, and added the 'idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 =
yes' line to the second DC, and
rebooted the servers, but the error does not go away.
First DC:
[global]
dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8
netbios name = TESTBOX
realm = SAMDOM.TESTING.COM
server role = active directory domain controller
workgroup = SAMDOM
idmap_ldb:use
2017 Nov 13
0
Setting up Second Samba DC samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset fails
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 09:59:23 +0100
Sina Owolabi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi List!
>
> I am working my way through getting familiar with samba and I have two
> domain controllers now with an additional samba file server.
> The servers are CentOS 7.4.1708;
> the domain controllers are built from source with samba-4.7.1;
> and the file server,
2016 Sep 28
0
samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset - NT_STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL
OK, I've traced this a little further on now.
I think I have followed the trail via the following items that call or
refer to each other in turn:
- python samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset
- source3/smbd/pysmbd.c: SMB_VFS_FSET_NT_ACL( fsp, security_info_sent, sd);
- source3/include/vfs_macros.h:#define SMB_VFS_FSET_NT_ACL
smb_vfs_call_fset_nt_acl
- source3/smbd/vfs.c:NTSTATUS
2019 Jul 18
2
Syncing sysvol -> samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset?
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 17:58, Rowland penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> On 17/07/2019 17:43, Kris Lou via samba wrote:
> > I had thought that the conventional wisdom was that ntacl sysvolreset
> > should be mostly avoided once relative stability achieved and additional
> > GPO's created.
> >
> >
2016 Sep 11
4
samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset - NT_STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL
Hi,
After making progress with my scripts for software installation (thanks,
Rowland!) I am on a bit of a mission to get things working again.
I found that permissions on my sysvol share were somehow incorrect (group
ownership was root, etc.) so I ran 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset'.. however
this now fails with the following error. (I'm on Samba 4.5.0)
user at dc2:~ $ sudo
2019 Apr 17
0
strange gpo behaviour
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 15:00 -0700, Ray Klassen via samba wrote:
> -- 3 samba 4.10.2 DC's, binaries compiled from tarballs on Debian
> stretch
> -- 2 DC's are on the same (main office) LAN, one is at another
> location
> vpn'ed to the main office
>
> -- randomly windows 10 pc's will not be able to complete a gpupdate
> (repeated tries) with no consistency
2017 Nov 13
2
Setting up Second Samba DC samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset fails
Hi List!
I am working my way through getting familiar with samba and I have two
domain controllers now with an additional samba file server.
The servers are CentOS 7.4.1708;
the domain controllers are built from source with samba-4.7.1;
and the file server, installed winbind, smb and nmb from CentOS repos.
My problem is after bringing up the second domain controller and
successfully joining it
2018 Feb 28
0
[Bug 105173] [MCP79][Regression] Unhandled NULL pointer dereference in nvkm_object_unmap since kernel 4.15
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105173
Sérgio M. Basto <sergio at serjux.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sergio at serjux.com
--- Comment #9 from Sérgio M. Basto <sergio at serjux.com> ---
Complete
2017 May 11
2
Problems with samba-tool ntacl sysvol reset
Hi,
after adding a new GPO the ntacl sysvolcheck fails and i want wo repair
with ntacl sysvolreset.... biut this fails aslo in the end with:
connect_acl_xattr: setting 'inherit acls = true' 'dos filemode = true'
and 'force unknown acl user = true' for service sysvol
open: error=2 (No such file or directory)
ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741823,
2019 Mar 14
2
replication fails
On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 07:38 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:59:29 +0000
> Sérgio Basto via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 11:22 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle via samba
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Stefan,
> > >
> > > Debian 8 ? 9?
> > > DC's samba version ?
> > >
2019 Apr 15
4
compile samba 4.10.2 centos 7.6
On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 10:38 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 11:43 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 07:43 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 7:20 AM Andreas Habel via samba
> > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
2018 Mar 18
0
[Bug 105173] [MCP79][Regression] Unhandled NULL pointer dereference in nvkm_object_unmap since kernel 4.15
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105173
--- Comment #19 from Sérgio M. Basto <sergio at serjux.com> ---
(In reply to Maris Nartiss from comment #18)
> (In reply to Sérgio M. Basto from comment #17)
> > I tested https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=137730 on a
> > kernel-4.15
> > but doesn't fixed my boot problem .
>
> Then, please, open
2019 Mar 14
0
replication fails
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 18:10:00 +0000
Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 07:38 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:59:29 +0000
> > Sérgio Basto via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 11:22 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle via samba
> > > wrote:
> >