Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos"
2019 Feb 19
5
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Hi Stefan,
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> Stefan G. Weichinger via samba
> Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2019 10:43
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
>
> Am 18.02.19 um 08:38 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba:
> > Goood morning Stefan, ( and
2019 Feb 21
3
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Am 21.02.19 um 15:49 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba:
> Or...
>
> Set the creator group option.
>
> [Daten]
> comment = Daten
> create mask = 3660
> directory mask = 3770
did so, they test now. thanks
2019 Feb 21
3
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Am 21.02.19 um 15:00 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> Apart from a missing line:
>
> idmap config arbeitsgruppe : schema_mode = rfc2307
>
> There doesn't seem to be anything really wrong.
Added, thanks.
Since my last mail I tested more and we found that ACLs were missing
wrong, so I applied an ACL to give group "domain users" rwx here.
Is create mask still
2019 Feb 22
4
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Stefan,
If everythig works now. Then keep it as is.
Most probly it was the firewall that caused the problem.
@Rowland, good point. Im everytime amazed with all the commands you know.. :-)
And SID: S-1-5-21domain-513 = domain users.
These are "Samba Sids" S-1-22-[1-2]
1 useres
2 groups
And thats corect with wbinfo -g 10513 shows all groups.
Greetz,
Louis
>
2019 Feb 22
4
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Good morning Stefan,
Hmm, yes, i notice some things also with the debian 9.8 upgrade, that killed my kopano server.
Was a long night yesterday. :-( but fixed.
Ive done all my servers here and no samba problems.
I do know of more problems with docker.
There is a small difference, i dont know exact were, but i detected that on the kopano forum.
Kopano builds it packages within docker, the
2019 Feb 22
3
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Am 22.02.19 um 12:16 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba:
> Hai,
>
> Well, i did some extra checking, gone throug more logs.
> ... Nothing. No errors. Sorry, i cant find anything..
>
> Almost all my server run unattended updates, execpt the DC's.
>
> I had a few that where waiting for a reboot tomorrow night, all now rebooted,
> and no problems before and
2019 Feb 22
4
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Hai,
That bond0 interface, you might want to change that the interface name to bond1
Depending on the bonding settings, you might have hit a reserved name.
I lots my docu on that but i know i configured a bond1 because bond0 didn work right.
And then check these.
wbinfo -pPt ( or wbinfo -p && wbinfo -P && wbinfo -t )
wbinfo --sids-to-unix-ids S-1-22-2-10513
wbinfo -D
2019 Feb 22
1
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Am 21.02.19 um 19:19 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba:
> Am 21.02.19 um 16:51 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba:
>> Am 21.02.19 um 15:49 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba:
>>> Or...
>>>
>>> Set the creator group option.
>>>
>>> [Daten]
>>> comment = Daten
>>> create mask = 3660
>>> directory mask =
2019 Feb 21
0
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Hai Stefan,
Yes, thats correct, you should have rebooted. ;-)
The reboot is required in the update due to the kernel updates.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> Stefan G. Weichinger via samba
> Verzonden: donderdag 21 februari 2019 10:20
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba]
2019 Feb 21
2
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
# Global parameters
[global]
interfaces = bond0
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
log level = 5 auth:5 winbind:8
printcap name = /dev/null
realm = SOMEDOM.AT
security = ADS
username map = /etc/samba/user.map
winbind refresh tickets = Yes
winbind use default domain = Yes
workgroup = ARBEITSGRUPPE
idmap config arbeitsgruppe:unix_nss_info = yes
idmap config arbeitsgruppe:range =
2019 Feb 22
2
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Am 22.02.19 um 15:16 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:03:37 +0100
> "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> Hai,
>>
>> That bond0 interface, you might want to change that the interface
>> name to bond1 Depending on the bonding settings, you might have hit a
>> reserved name. I lots my docu
2019 Feb 22
2
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Am 22.02.19 um 15:32 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>> ARBEITSGRUPPE\Domain Users
>> S-1-5-21-2777655458-4002997014-749295002-513 (Domain Group: 2)
>>
>
> Looks correct, try these:
>
> wbinfo -n Domain\ Users
>
> wbinfo --group-info=Domain\ Users
>
> wbinfo --gid-info=10513
>
> Rowland
root at main:/etc/samba# wbinfo -n Domain\ Users
2019 Feb 21
0
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Or...
Set the creator group option.
[Daten]
comment = Daten
create mask = 3660
directory mask = 3770
path = /mnt/daten
read only = No
Greetz,
Now you can more easy mix windows and linux acls.
Test it Stefan, but file now created are now forced to set the "Creator group" its primay group,
Which should be "Domain users"
I suggest, create a few files from linux
2019 Feb 27
3
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Hai Stefan,
How are you telling its outdated?
And dont delete it if you would re-created it.
Move it away/backup it.
But this would help you.
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Keytab_Extraction
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> Stefan G. Weichinger via samba
> Verzonden: woensdag 27 februari
2019 Feb 22
1
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Hai Stefan,
Hmm is time in sync. Did that server have these 3 settings in smb.conf?
Yes/no/which ones ?
kerberos method = secrets and keytab
dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab
# renew the kerberos ticket
winbind refresh tickets = yes
Especialy the refresh ticket..
I see this is a RID setup? Not AD.
Because if thats so, i run only in AD backend on the members.
Can
2019 Feb 22
0
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 13:59:36 +0100
"Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Am 22.02.19 um 12:16 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba:
> > Hai,
> >
> > Well, i did some extra checking, gone throug more logs.
> > ... Nothing. No errors. Sorry, i cant find anything..
> >
> > Almost all my server run unattended
2019 Feb 22
0
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Hai,
Well, i did some extra checking, gone throug more logs.
... Nothing. No errors. Sorry, i cant find anything..
Almost all my server run unattended updates, execpt the DC's.
I had a few that where waiting for a reboot tomorrow night, all now rebooted,
and no problems before and after.
So its bit hard to detect whats going on at your side.
Are all you servers having this or a few.
2019 Feb 22
0
Debian 9.8 and vanbelle-repos
Am 22.02.19 um 15:28 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba:
> Stefan,
>
> If everythig works now. Then keep it as is.
> Most probly it was the firewall that caused the problem.
>
> @Rowland, good point. Im everytime amazed with all the commands you know.. :-)
> And SID: S-1-5-21domain-513 = domain users.
>
> These are "Samba Sids" S-1-22-[1-2]
> 1
2020 Oct 16
2
Problem transfering fsmo roles.
Hi,
I have a Samba domain which currently has 4 DC's. I am in the process of
trying to remove the old 4.8.12 self compiled DC's and ultimately replace
them with (2) 4.12.8 DC's on Buster with samba from the VanBelle repo.
Due to an error in my apt configuration I currently have 2 4.11.14 DC's running
on Buster.
If I try to transfer the roles from one of the 4.8.12 DC's to one
2020 May 25
2
buster samba 4.12.3 amd64/i386/armhf
Hai,
?
Sorry for the Delay, bit overloaded with work, but the end is near. pff, finaly.. soon i take a long vacation..
?
Well, you know the drill..
Ubuntu 20.04 focal, is next.
?
For the Raspbian guys, please try how the buster-samba412 works for you and let me know the results.
Rapsbian will be last to build so if you in a need for the newer versions, use/try ?buster-samba412?
!! and dont