similar to: SMB Signing with "map to guest = " options

Hi, I'm using samba-4.7.x I have some confusions over "map to guest=" options with setting SMB Signing 1. Set "*Server signing =auto*", "*map to guest=bad uid*" and set "client signing in windows 2k12 server group policy" to "Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications (Always)” = *Disable*" SMB_Server is joined to Windows 2k12

Here is my smb.conf [global] workgroup=TEST server string=SMBServ netbios name=SHIVASMB realm=TEST.LOCAL log level=1 log file= max log size=2000 max smbd processes=100 security=ADS password server=10.10.1.5 wins support=no client NTLMv2 auth=Yes wins proxy=no server max protocol=SMB3 client max protocol=SMB3 dns proxy=no wins server=192.168.4.124, 0.0.0.0 name resolve order=lmhosts host wins

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 05:52:13 -0600 (CST) shivappa Sangapur via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using samba-4.7.x > I have some confusions over "map to guest=" options with setting SMB > Signing 1. Set "*Server signing =auto*", "*map to guest=bad uid*" and > set "client signing in windows 2k12 server group

RCSID("$OpenBSD: scp.c,v 1.113 2003/11/23 23:21:21 djm Exp $"); Part of the OpenSSH_3.8p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0.9.7c 30 Sep 2003 distribution Could someone verify this case we found that causes a file to be missed during copying? Here is the setup to replicate the problem: On hosta /tmp: -rw-rw-r-- 1 user01 group01 0 Apr 13 10:44 file0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 user01

Hi, I got my * working fine with FWD at office with 2 extensions, i receive calls and i can make calls thru FWD. I got also my * at home, and i connected it using auth=rsa. From my home, i can make calls using my office iax, but if i try to redirect incomming calls from FWD to my * at home, it rejects the call. I created the pub/key pairs for rsa and its working ok and i just pasted the

Hi. I'm using Samba 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix (RH-9.0) as member of WinNT4 domain. I joined samba to the domain. I configured the winbind daemon and nsswitch switch to map NT users to unix users. Then I set ACL support on an ext3 partition and share the mount point of this partition with ACL Samba support: - my share is [test_share] - the directory is /mnt/test_dir Shortly: ----

muiz wrote: > Dear all, > > > I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control. > There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve this problem? > > > [root at s1 abc]# getfacl /abc > # file: abc > # owner: root > # group: root > user::rwx > user:user01:--- >

Hi, I've been running a samba server with winbind (CentOS 7) as a member of an AD Domain (Windows 2012 R2) for several months without a problem. "Suddenly" I'm seeing the problem that the membership in newly created AD groups isn't correctly visible for some users on the samba server or only after some indefinite amount of time. I'm looking simply at the output of

On 20.03.2015 02:14, muiz wrote: > Dear all, > > > I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control. > There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve this problem? use xargs like in: |find . -name "*.pdf" -print0 | xargs -0 RUNACOMMAND robert | > > > [root at s1

Hi, How many user's you have assigned on that directory? --Regards Ashishkumar S. Yadav On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, muiz <muiz at 163.com> wrote: > Hi, James, > The file system is xfs (/dev/mapper/centos-home xfs 1891292900 > 1556745108 334547792 83% /home) > > > Thanks and best regards, > Muiz > > At 2015-03-23 19:36:02, "James

Hi all, Is anybody have this problem with Centos 4.2, postfix-2.1.5-4.2.RHEL4, dovecot-0.99.11-2.EL4.1 In the log /var/log/maillog have: Feb 2 08:44:44 net02 pop3(user01): Error indexing mbox file /var/mail/user01: LF not found where expected Feb 2 08:45:14 net02 pop3(user01): Error indexing mbox file /var/mail/user01: LF not found where expected Feb 2 08:45:14 net02 pop3(user01): Error

Hi, I''ve a problem and I don''t know if it is solvable with activeLDAP. Here is an example of the tree structure of our LDAP server. The structure isn''t exactly like that, but is similare and I can already access almost any informations of a user when I''m logging as this user. The probleme come when using the belong_to, has_many and ldap_mapping has you will

How to boot CentOS 7 in Text mode in default? I install CentOS 7 using vmware, and do not want to use graph mode. Thanks, Peidong

Hi, we have configured userdb and passdb in the director and try to iterate all users and pass the "purge" command via doveadm proxy to port 19000 on the correct director backend host. A single purge -u username at example.org via doveadm-proxy works correctly, but iterating over some users with -A fails. Note: users/domains have been anonymized in output:

Objective: different password for remote and local imap login Version: 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63) on CentOS 7 Users are from Active Directory, mapped to local users via sssd After much experimentation, I have configured this way: doveconf -n passdb userdb passdb { args = username_format=%Ln /etc/dovecot/remote driver = passwd-file skip = authenticated username_filter = user01

Hi guys! Do you know if there is a away to rename a list of samba 4 user accounts ? I need to change a list of 2000 users from "login name" to a "login number" i would not like to do this one by one. I know that in windows server i can do using powershell script, but it doesn´t work with samba. If you have any ideia on how to do this i appreciate. Thanks!! --

I am investigating how to limit user logins via sshd to specific times of day. I have the basic syntax but what I want to know is how does pam_time.so process time.conf. Say I have a clutch of users that should login between 07:00 and 18:00 Monday to Friday. I infer that the following will handle that: sshd;*;*,Wk0700-1800 However, what is not clear to me is how does one permit certain

Hi, When using AD authentication from a rhel8.1 environment with samba-4.10.4 installed, information on the primary group group01 set on the AD side for any user user01 cannot be obtained. [root @ rhel8_1 ~] # id user01 uid=2001107(user01) gid=2000513(domain users) groups=2000513(domain users),2001107(oec0814e),2001103(group01) If you perform the same operation on the same AD from the

Hi, Our setup: Samba (classic) DC: cdr-dc01 Samba (classic) member server: cdr-fs01. This is also a file server AD realm: CDR.internal We migrated to AD and came across an issue with accessing shares. The shares in question worked pre-migrated. i.e using a windows machine a user was able to access that share. The share in question was locked down to just that user Post migration, we are able

Hello! My User is only in AD, the passwd see some User (system) with high GID in the same range of Samba Example: statd: x: 108: 65534 :: / var / lib / nfs: / bin / false My fear is that change again and lose everything again permissions, which had to redo everything ... Thank you Em 12-07-2016 16:21, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 12/07/16 20:03, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >> Hello!