similar to: Authenticating AD users and Local users

Thank you for replying! I can login with my Active Directory credentials, but I can’t login using the local CentOS “svc_dictations” account. I created the local account usingusing “adduser”, “smbpasswd”, and then updating my smb.conf file (below). Thank you, Brian [global] workgroup = YALE password server = ad1.yu.yale.edu<http://ad1.yu.yale.edu>

Would someone please tell me where I can find some good troubleshooting documents to resolve AD authentication issues when using Samba? Is this mailing list the best place? I was able to setup a working WINBIND-Samba setup on CentOS 7.6, but I am required to use SSSD on a different CentOS 7.6 server. Using a test VM, I can get services running, but I can't authenticate from a Mac or

Is an "official" vorbisgain source tarball available anywhere for *nix? Seems like everything I've found is a pre-built windows binary... Thanks in advance! Regards, Owen G. Emry ----- DTS Engineer PalmSource, Inc. <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have seen a weird problem in one of my clients. The reported that when issuing a smbmount command (both client and server are CentOS 4.4), it would take up to 30 second for the mount to complete. To make a long history short, by using strace and the source, I noticed smbmnt is first calling mount() using ascii options for *data. Then that would

Hi Rowland, Made some changes as shown below: [global]? ? ? ? log file = %S.log? ? ? ? log level = 3? ? ? ? workgroup = WORKGROUP? ? ? ? security = user? ? ? ? passdb backend = tdbsam? ? ? ? printing = cups? ? ? ? printcap name = cups? ? ? ? load printers = yes? ? ? ? cups options = raw? ? ? ? lanman auth = no? ? ? ? ntlm auth = yes [Anonymous]? ? ? ? comment = anonymous file share? ? ? ? path =

Hi! I created a Samba4 Demo Server to test AD functionality. Basically it's a Debian Wheezy machine with a manually compiled Samba4 (smbstatus -V: Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-051a1a9) according to https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO but adjusted the paths to a more debian way. I can Manage the Server with the Windows Domain Utilities, add users, add groups, add Machines and so

Dear all I struggle with a very annoying bug ! The problem is very simple to reproduce (NO Windows stuff needed, ONLY Linux !): 1. Samba 3.5.6 running on a Debian 6 (Squeeze) Server with following configuration: /etc/samba/smb.conf: security = user guest account = nobody map to guest = bad user null passwords = yes case sensitive = yes [myshare]

I am running the PCLinux OS (kernel 5.10.12) and it has recently upgraded samba to 4.10.2.?? With the upgrade the connection to my NAS units have ceased to work.?? The NAS is a DLink DNS-343 (old but they work).?? I have five of them in my network and use them for secondary storage so only spin them up when I need them. My last access to the NAS was about a month ago before the upgrade to

Hello, After an upgrade to samba 3.5.8 (from 3.2.5) the option 'dos filemode' does not seem to work anymore. If I (as a user) do not own the file I can't change permissions. I am user 'felix' and member of supplementary group 'Development'. To test things I use the following share definition: [Temp] path = /srv/samba/file-shares/tmp browseable =

Hi, I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1, testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only created with 660 permissions. Here are the ACL's of testshare: # file: testshare # owner: ralfgro # group: ve user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup1:rwx group:testgroup2:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::---

Hello! Please look at this log entry: [2018/10/30 15:26:04.013132, 0] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:3358(process_usershare_file) process_usershare_file: stat of /var/lib/samba/usershares/share failed. Permission denied I don't know why this message is spamming my log, my version of samba is 4.9.1 from fedora 29, but problem existed long time ago with older versions. here is usershares

On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:03:14PM +0000, Sun, Zhongdong via samba wrote: >Hi Rowland, > >Thanks for your quick response. > >Yes, it's Samba+sssd+krb5+AD. So many technologies wrapped together, > and I don't know which part can go wrong. We managed to make them work >together with the full domain name format such as yu.yale.edu\zs24. >But it didn't work with

Hello All, I'm new to the list and I don't have much of experience with samba. I have a test setup on CentOS 7.8 with samba-4.10.4 and samba-vfs-glusterfs . When my client mounts the samba share via vers=1.0 , the user sees the share properly (uid,gid,mode are just like on gluster). When the share is mounted with vers=2.0 or not specified (anything higher) the files are owned by

I am confused (nothing new there ...). I have 2 Ubuntu 9.10 Samba servers. I am trying to mount a share from the other (i.e., "workhorse" is trying to mount a share on "dual-booter"). If I specify a smbmount command with a -k option, I can mount the share: turgon at workhorse:~$ klist Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_1000 Default principal: turgon at DACRIB.LOCAL Valid starting

icecast@xiph.org wrote: > Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. > We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of > "(no subject)". > > Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your > mailer's "Reply" feature. > > icecast+confirm+1053014484.2633.87372b@xiph.org > > Rather than

On Tue, 7 May 2024 22:19:38 +0000 "Sun, Zhongdong" <zhongdong.sun at yale.edu> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > You are right. We are running some old software here, such as NIS. > All these started in 20 years ago when I joined the group and we had > about 20-30 workstations running Linux. NIS was chosen at that time > to manage user accounts. Some users were not

Hi Rowland, You are right. We are running some old software here, such as NIS. All these started in 20 years ago when I joined the group and we had about 20-30 workstations running Linux. NIS was chosen at that time to manage user accounts. Some users were not familiar with Linux, so we provided Samba to them so that they could map Linux file systems to their computers. I know NIS is old

I am having a problem with loading R on my 64 bit computer. It used to load perfectly until I upgraded to R 3.0.0 now it takes about 10 to even 20 minutes ? Does anyone know how to remedy this problem? Russell " Skip" Barbour Ph.D. Associate Director for Statistics Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS Yale School of Medicine 135 College St. Suit 200 New Haven ,

Hi, I have a case where I only want to restrict access to SMB shares via filesystem permissions (and POSIX ACLs). Therefore, I do not want Samba to verify security in any way at the SMB level. If the filesystem/ACL permissions allow access to the shared directory, so should Samba. If the filesystem does not allow access to the filesystem, Samba should deny as well. I thought I had this

So, I have "working" builds of Samba 3.6.10, and 4.0.2 using the traditional build system on AIX, both built with XLC. For historical reasons, we're needing to use 'encrypt passwords = no', so that Samba uses the OS password. The odd thing, is, the 3.6.10 Samba works just fine, but the 4.0.2 doesn't allow connections. Here's the Samba config I'm using on both: