similar to: Windows search equivalent on Samba?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Windows search equivalent on Samba?"

2020 Jun 03
1
Samba vs Windows - File sharing in a domain setting
Hai Viktor, I dont know or can't tell if this setup can use the windows indexing, i havent looked in to that. I dont use windows indexer. But i do know if you setup as shown and you add a webpage to the server, that makes is also usable for Windows users to search. There was some work done in the area
2020 Jun 02
3
Samba vs Windows - File sharing in a domain setting
I've been working with Samba in an AD domain setting for several years now. Small potatoes, nothing fancy. A few months ago, I came across the limitation of Samba, in comparison to file sharing from a Windows server, that, at the current moment, it doesn't offer an indexing service that is compatible with Windows Search. So, no matter how much I like Samba, if I need this feature, I have
2020 Apr 19
2
Status of Windows Search Protocol support in Samba?
On 19/04/2020 10:25, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > Am 4/17/20 um 5:55 PM schrieb Mark Rousell via samba: >> I've been trying to Google this but have not found any definitive >> answers. Does Samba currently support Windows Search Protocol[1]? > short answer: no. > > Last time I talked to Noel this is still a multi-weeks effort (iirc) > getting it finished, polished
2019 Mar 04
0
Windows search equivalent on Samba?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:18:21PM +0100, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: > In a pure Windows environment I'm helping manage, I recently had to set up > full text indexing on a file share. Since it's not possible to actually > index a file share from the client side, this has to be done on the server > itself and in case of Windows Server, this is done using the Windows
2020 Apr 21
2
Status of Windows Search Protocol support in Samba?
(resending, apologies if you got it already but I got a rejection message) Hi All On 21/04/2020 01:48, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:49:55AM +0100, Mark Rousell via samba wrote: >> On 19/04/2020 10:25, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: >>> Am 4/17/20 um 5:55 PM schrieb Mark Rousell via samba: >>>> I've been trying to Google this but
2020 Jun 02
1
Samba vs Windows - File sharing in a domain setting
Hi Louis, The idea I had with this thread is to just get an honest comparison between Windows and Samba when it comes to file sharing needs in the Windows world, the missing Windows Search capability was just an example to get the discussion going. If I understand your reference correctly, there is a solution, compatible with Apple's Spotlight, to index files on a Samba server using
2020 Apr 17
3
Status of Windows Search Protocol support in Samba?
I've been trying to Google this but have not found any definitive answers. Does Samba currently support Windows Search Protocol[1]? I did find these lecture slides from a few years ago (five years?) but they don't tell me about the current status: https://sambaxp.org/archive_data/SambaXP2015-SLIDES/wed/track1/sambaxp2015-wed-track1-Noel_Power-WindowSearchProtocolAndSamba.pdf (by Noel
2020 Apr 21
2
Status of Windows Search Protocol support in Samba?
On 21/04/2020 13:14, Mark Rousell via samba wrote: > On 21/04/2020 12:38, Noel Power via samba wrote: >> (resending, apologies if you got it already but I got a rejection message) > This one got through on the Samba list. > > Thank you for your helpful reply. > >> yep, WSP server that translates protocol to tracker sparql queries is >> working (with caveats [1])
2019 Sep 22
4
Problem with libldb1
On 22.09.2019 15:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 22/09/2019 13:53, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >> I just ran "apt upgrade" on my DC (Ubuntu 18.04, Samba 4.10 from Louis >> Repo) and it ended with error messages about unmet dependencies in >> regards >> to libldb1. >> > Yes, but did you run 'apt-get update' first ? > >
2019 Sep 22
3
Problem with libldb1
On 22.09.2019 15:30, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 22/09/2019 14:10, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >> On 22.09.2019 15:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 22/09/2019 13:53, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >>>> I just ran "apt upgrade" on my DC (Ubuntu 18.04, Samba 4.10 from Louis >>>> Repo) and it ended with error messages
2016 Jan 25
2
Windows 10 administrative templates /central store with Samba
On 25.01.2016 14:13, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > Unless you want to add functionality that is new since 1511, I don't > think that's necessary. I have already added a Win10 machine to a domain, where only Win7 clients were joined before that. I have managed this domain from Win7 only, so far. Therefore I believe that e.g. the Windows Update policy is not fit for
2015 Nov 16
4
Win Clients and DNS
On 11/16/2015 11:15 AM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > > > On 16.11.2015 16:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >> Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? >> >> Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client >> objects after the 'leave'? >> >> Ole >> > > Yes, first and only. As I said, it's more or less a lab setup
2015 Nov 16
6
Win Clients and DNS
On 16.11.2015 14:44, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/11/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.11.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: >>> >>> >>> On 16.11.2015 13:48, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> See replies below >>>> >>>> On 16.11.2015 12:39, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 16/11/15 11:19,
2015 Nov 16
4
Win Clients and DNS
There is nothing wrong with your policies. Test if it all works and if it does, ignore these messages. I having the same message. ( samba 4.2.5 ) Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Viktor Trojanovic > Verzonden: maandag 16 november 2015 15:54 > Aan: Rowland Penny; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp:
2016 Jan 25
2
Windows 10 administrative templates /central store with Samba
Viktor, thanks again! Now that I did this (added the Win10 1511 ADMX files to the central store), I probably will have to recreate the policies that will be applied to Win10 machines, right? Ole On 21.01.2016 17:16, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > I've been using Samba with Win10 clients for a while now, so I'm happy > to share some of my findings. > > See
2019 Sep 23
4
Problem with libldb1
Hai Victor, Sorry for these, i did not know there was still one going on in the ubuntu package. These are known since 26 july.. What i need/want to know here from which version to which version did you upgrade. I'll fix that in the next update. There where 2 things going on here. - one file moved from package. (apt --fix-broken install) - The othere was due to the changes in ldb with
2015 Nov 16
2
Win Clients and DNS
Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client objects after the 'leave'? Ole Am 16.11.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: > > > On 16.11.2015 15:59, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> There is nothing wrong with your policies. >> >> Test if it all works and if it does, ignore these messages.
2019 Feb 10
3
AD Backup Best Practice
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 20:23, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 20:11:02 +0100 > Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 19:52, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 19:33:17 +0100 > > > Viktor
2015 Nov 16
3
Win Clients and DNS
Hai, I suggest you dont remove the "Register DNS" checkbox from the network" option. If you setup if correct, when you join a computer to the domain, It wil automatily registere the computer en the AD DNS. And todo so you need the "Register DNS" checkbox from the network" For example, i use for now an dhcp server ! the DHCP server i use it NOT in any of the MS
2015 Nov 16
6
Win Clients and DNS
On 16.11.2015 17:52, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/11/15 16:35, James wrote: >> On 11/16/2015 11:15 AM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 16.11.2015 16:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >>>> Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? >>>> >>>> Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client >>>>