similar to: hostname is missing in the output from "smbstatus -b"

Hello Rowland, thanks for answering so fast. > > > > we have migrated our Samba server from version 3.6 to Samba 4.6. > > > > Everyting is working fine, but I have seen one difference in the > > output from "smbstatus -b". > > > > The hostname in the output is no longer displayed (see examples below) > > 1) The hostname must come from

On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 18:44:57 +0100 Meike Stone via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello dear group, > > we have migrated our Samba server from version 3.6 to Samba 4.6. > > Everyting is working fine, but I have seen one difference in the > output from "smbstatus -b". > > The hostname in the output is no longer displayed (see examples below)

On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 20:32:53 +0100 Meike Stone via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Rowland, > thanks for answering so fast. > > > > > > > we have migrated our Samba server from version 3.6 to Samba 4.6. > > > > > > Everyting is working fine, but I have seen one difference in the > > > output from "smbstatus -b".

Hello, we use samba with ldap backend. All is working well. Now the user count should grow to about 3000 users in a mixed environment with PCs and terminal servers. So the most of the users typically have (more than one) sessions to different terminal servers. The smb version is (tragically) still v1 and a lot of the clients comes over a NAT gateway. To reduce the traffic to the remote ldap

Hello dear list, I have running a Samba 3 server (under SLES11) connected to an LDAP-Server and it is running well. But now, I like to migrate to Samba 4 and I've made a few tests before. The whole time I with Samba 3, I was surprised about the many ldap requests so that I thought about an additional local OpenLDAP proxy cache. But now with Samba 4 (with the same configuration like Samba 3,

Hello, I run samba 3.6 and I need to track problems for dedicated users. So I thought, I load at the end via include special configurations for the user separately. My question is, how does the smbd configure itself. Does smbd 1) reads the config completely and then it set the parameters in the process or 2) does smbd reads and set each parameter instantly? So can I use the following example?

Hello, I'm trying to configure a CIFS-Proxy. My configuration is: [global] workgroup = MYDOM server role = member server realm = MYDOM.NET netbios name = FS01 server services = +smb +s3fs dcerpc endpoint servers = +winreg +srvsvc [test] ntvfs handler = cifs cifs:server = 192.168.1.10 cifs:share = projects$ but in

Hello, I've running a samba server: --------- * Samba 3.6.3 * using LDAP for users an groups part. of config: ---------- workgroup = Samba security = user ldap admin dn = uid=samba_user,cn=admin,o=company,c=net passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap01.company.net ldap suffix = cn=users,o=company,c=net ldap user suffix = cn=accounts

Hello dear list, I need help with authentication configuration on samba. It is a little bit special ... We have a Linux-Server with all users/groups local configured. (nsswitch.conf points to passwd and groups) We have ONE share configured and under this shared folder are located separated project folders. On each project folder are set posix ACLs with two groups for read only and write

Hi there, during my work I have to use kernel smoothing methods for multivariate ordinal data. The R-package "KernSmooth" unfortunately includes only a version for continous scaled variables. Does anybody know whether there exists also a version for ordinal data? Thanks for help! --

Hello everyone, *Short version:*I've set up an LLVM Discord server for real time chat (similar to IRC) and an LLVM Discourse server for forums (similar to email lists): https://discord.gg/xS7Z362 https://llvm.discourse.group/ Please join and use these new services. They are only partially set up and still very new, so don't hesitate to improve them and/or reach out to this thread with

Hello, I've a problem on my system with inotify. In the smbd logfile are shown a lot messages like this: [2015/06/10 11:15:21.644453, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100), real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_inotify.c:297(inotify_setup) Failed to init inotify - Too many open files [2015/06/10 11:15:23.968497, 0, pid=57030, effective(12700, 100), real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_inotify.c:297(inotify_setup)

Hello, I want to prevent users to change file/directory rights and haven't found any possible solution. Setup: --------- * Samba 3.6.3 * using LDAP for users an groups Config: ---------- workgroup = Samba security = user ldap admin dn = uid=samba_user,cn=admin,o=company,c=net passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap01.company.net ldap suffix =

The lists are working well for the people who are already invested in the community though - as was identified by Chandler they aren't working as well for new people. I'm an insanely confident Scotsman with just about zero fear of any/all social situations, and I've always found this mailing list to be utterly terrifying (thus I've been a 10 year mostly-lurker). My fear

FWIW I'm a fan of using open-source stuff for open-source projects. Discourse looks open source, but Discord doesn't as far as I can tell (?). On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:15 AM Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I sent the message quoted below to llvm-dev@ just now, but it applies to > the whole community so sending an FYI

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:32 AM David Tellenbach via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > +1 from my side for using "faster" or "more direct" communication channels > such > as Discord (no strong opinion on the choice of any particular tool here) > for > informal chats and discussions on a "support level". This is

Hello, > As far as I understood you are using ldapsam only when Samba is running as > AD domain controller. it is only a standalone server, no sid/gid (mapping) needed. All users and groups are local (passwd/groups) maintained. We only want to authenticate the users against the ldap server (openDJ). No Active Directory is used. But if I configure, there are a lot (to much) ldap

David, I'm glad you mentioned Discord's T&Cs. I'm not generally concerned about these kinds of things, but Discord's seems particularly aggressive. Particularly the phrase "perpetual, nonexclusive, transferable, royalty-free, sublicensable, and worldwide license" is... a lot. Since LLVM is a permissively licensed project I assume many of our contributors care about

Hi llvm-admin, (cc llvm-dev for visibility) We’re working on some improvements to the documentation, and want to move things (e.g. the Kaleidoscope tutorial into a subdirectory) around without breaking any links to it. Is there a way to do forwards on the web page that you prefer? -Chris

But is it better or worse than IRC in this regard? On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:49 PM Daniel Chapiesky via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Daniel Chapiesky <dchapiesky2 at gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 1:48 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for >