similar to: Samba 4.9.4 - high RAM usage - OOM killer

Hai, How is the swappiness set? cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness Its probely set to 60, i suggest, lower it to 10 or 20. That wil help keeping the samba processes out of swap. I've see more programs gettting OOM Killed due too out of swap. echo 10 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness Stop and start samba Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

Hi Laurent, > > We upgraded a legacy (NT4) domain from 3.6 series to 4.8 and then 4.9.4 > samba version (using sernet subscription packages / debian stable) > > The setup is composed of 4 DCs with each 2 CPU/16GB RAM. > > We currently have ~700 user accounts / ~600 computers / ~150 groups > > Our mail setup, SSO, ... query the 4 DCs constantly. > > > Every 5 to

Hello, On my bridge head DC, i can see in kern.log lots of < Out of memory : kill process > I'm using Samba 4.9.6 (11147 objects) on Debian Stretch 64 This DC synchronize from/to 20 others DC in bridge head mode (no mesh) Here is my VM (HyperV 2016) config : - 4 x Vcpu (intel Xeon Silver 4110) - 2 Go Ram - 1 Go swap I'm really not an expert on this

I added a subject so we can track this message on the list easier. ;) On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:19 PM, John Doe <jdmls at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hey, > > kernel: rsync invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x200da, order=0, oom_adj=0, > oom_score_adj=0 > ... > kernel: Out of memory: Kill process 27974 (mysqld) score 361 or > sacrifice child > kernel: Killed process

Hi Denis, > could you please take a look at which process is taking so much RAM? > Is there a pile of smbd process around? If you are using Bind-dlz, how > much memory named is eating? Is is the increase in RAM consumption is > linear over time? > > If it is a "samba" process that is eating all the RAM, please check > the PID and the samba-tool processes

Hi All, I have a server that has its swappiness set to 0. It is running a little tight on memory and so there have been a couple of events where the OOM_killer has been invoked and killed off MySQL, which you would expect. Now if you have your swappiness at 0 then "A value of 0 instructs the kernel not to initiate swap until the amount of free and file-backed pages is less than the high

hi all, I use rsync to copy/backup ALL my stuff to another disk. When I run this seems like my machine (4 GIG ram centos 5.1) now begins to swap out more programs. Is there a way to reduce that swapping? I am running with echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness I simply mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt/backup; mkdir /mnt/backup/month.day.year then rsync -a /home /mnt/backup/mon.day.year This is approximately

I have a 2 node cluster of HP DL380G4s. These machines are attached via scsi to an external HP disk enclosure. They run 32bit RH AS 4.0 and OCFS 1.2.4, the latest release. They were upgraded from 1.2.3 only a few days after 1.2.4 was released. I had reported on the mailing list that my developers were happy, and things seemed faster. However, twice in that time, the cluster has gone down due

Hello all, had an issue on with a virtualmachine on XenServer 7.0 yesterday. It is a Centos 7.4.1708 and in a OOM situation it just shut down. No kernel panic where I could see a message, but it just turned itself off. All I could see in the /var/log/messages was the following: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sep 24 03:11:08 hostname xe-daemon: Running

Hi all, I used to use centos 4.5 on an AMD 4800+ with 2GIG ram. Now I use centos 5.1 on AMD 6400+ with 4GIG RAM. The system responsiveness is different between the two. I noticed that centos 5.1 seems to be swapping programs out of memory at times resulting in slowness (perceived by me). I played with swappiness (/proc/sys/vm/) setting to 10, then 1 then 0. Still resulted in the same perceived

Hello All, Anyone have seen this before? Did samba_spnupdate really caused the crash??? [ 49.753564] block drbd1: drbd_sync_handshake: [ 49.753571] block drbd1: self BB16E125AF60AEDC:0000000000000000:30D97136FB1DA7A3:30D87136FB1DA7A3 bits:0 flags:0 [ 49.753576] block drbd1: peer 6365B5AFF049F16D:BB16E125AF60AEDD:30D97136FB1DA7A2:30D87136FB1DA7A3 bits:1 flags:0 [ 49.753580] block drbd1:

Hi all, This might not be CentOS related at all. Sorry about that. I have lots of C6 & C7 machines in use and all of them have the default swappiness of 60. The problem now is that a lot of those machines do swap although there is no memory pressure. I'm now thinking about lowering swappiness to 1. But I'd still like to find out why this happens. The only common thing between all

Hi all, I order to reach maximum performance on my centos kvm hosts I have use these params: - On /etc/grub.conf: kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 ro root=LABEL=/ elevator=deadline quiet - On sysctl.conf # Special network params net.core.rmem_default = 8388608 net.core.wmem_default = 8388608 net.core.rmem_max = 16777216 net.core.wmem_max = 16777216

Am 05.06.2015 um 18:33 schrieb Gordon Messmer: > On 06/05/2015 03:29 AM, Markus "Shorty" Uckelmann wrote: >> some (probably unused) parts are swapped out. But, some of >> those parts are the salt-minion, php-fpm or mysqld. All services which >> are important for us and which suffer badly from being swapped out. > > Those two things can't really both be

Hi all, Recently I build XEN 4.1 (from the xen.org) on centIOS 5.5 (kernel 2.6.38.4). After changing the grub file and rebooting the machine, I am continuously getting out of memory error. The content of my grub file: default=0 timeout=5 serial --unit=0 --speed=115200 terminal --timeout=10 console serial splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title CentOS (2.6.38.4) root

also in /etc/sysctl.d/ On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/23/2015 05:08 AM, Ofer Hasson wrote: > >> By running "systemctl status systemd-sysctl" I also receive the same >> output, but a simple "cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness" returns the default >> value, and not the one set by my conf file.

Am 05.06.2015 um 00:23 schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: > If I'd have to venture a guess then I'd say there are memory pages that > are never touched by any processes and as a result the algorithm has > decided that it's more effective to swap out these pages to disk and use > the freed ram for the page-cache. That's my guess too. [...] > impact. If however these

Hi, I'm having problems in a second domain controller machine. Every time a restart samba, few time after a samba process starts using almost 100% cpu. It's a Centos 6.5 x86_64 with the following: sernet-samba-libsmbclient0-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-ad-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64 sernet-build-key-1.1-4.noarch sernet-samba-libs-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-client-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64

Hi people, I got Centos 4.3 on a 1GB Pentium IV machine. The output of free ------------------- $ free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 1026896 573848 453048 0 2988 131712 -/+ buffers/cache: 439148 587748 Swap: 1052248 137568 914680 ------------------ There is plenty of free ram, but the kernel

On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 19:02:35 +0200 Karl Heinz Wichmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hallo Marc > > I change the loglevel to 10 > > > database > "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so -d 10"; > > and i get following errors: > > 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: ldb: ldb_asprintf/set_errstring: > No