similar to: Windows ACL behaviour in standalone fileservers (LDAP vs TDB)

I noticed I didn't ask a question ;-) Has anybody seen this behaviour? Can this be explained? thank you matthias Am 23.01.19 um 11:50 schrieb Matthias Leopold via samba: > Hi, > > I'm building and managing standalone fileservers (security = user) with > various passdb backends. I'm noticing different behaviour of Windows > ACLs for servers with LDAP and TDB passdb

On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:09:43 +0100 Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I noticed I didn't ask a question ;-) > I noticed that you didn't give us much to work with ;-) Can you post the smb.conf files from the working ldap machine and the non-working 'tdb' machine. Rowland

Am 11.02.19 um 16:33 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:40:02 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 11.02.19 um 14:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:46:05 +0100 >>> Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>

Hi, i (naively) would like to have local AND ldap users (and groups...) on my standalone fileserver (security = user). "passdb backend = ldapsam" already works OK and i found some old posts on the internet about "chaining" passdb backends. so i tried "chaining" ldapsam and tdbsam, but although testparm doesn't complain and i can add local users with

Am 2015-09-24 um 20:32 schrieb Marc Muehlfeld: > Hello Matthias, > > Am 23.09.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Matthias Leopold: >> this seems to be a mat{,t}hias discussion ;-) > > oh, sorry. :-) > > > > >> Marc, you said i can have windows ACLs on a standalone server. How do i >> accomplish the >>

Am 11.02.19 um 13:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:30:51 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we are using a _single_ LDAP server as backend for _multiple_ Samba >> standalone file servers (security=user). This LDAP server serves >> mainly other purposes and access for Samba is

thanks for caring about this. Ming Xie, are you opening this BZ bug? thanks matthias Am 2017-07-07 um 13:31 schrieb Tomáš Golembiovský: > Hi, > > yes it is an issue in VDSM. We count on the disks being in storage pool > (except for block devices). > > Can you open a BZ bug for that please. > > Thanks, > > Tomas > > > On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 02:52:26

Am 11.02.19 um 14:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:46:05 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 11.02.19 um 13:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:30:51 +0100 >>> Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>

Am 2018-02-19 um 17:39 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:03:31 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i'm trying to setup Samba 4.6 on CentOS 7.4 as a Domain Member of a >> Windows 2012R2 Domain Controller with AD. To administer share >> security i have to use the "username

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:51:41AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 21:45 +0100, Matthias Leopold via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I posted a similar question in 2018 with no answers, so I'll try > > again: > > Is it possible to have shares with Windows ACLs and shares with > > POSIX > > ACLs on the same server

I could reproduce customer's problem Packages: rhv:4.1.3-0.1.el7 vdsm-4.19.20-1.el7ev.x86_64 virt-v2v-1.36.3-6.el7.x86_64 libguestfs-1.36.3-6.el7.x86_64 Steps: 1.Prepare a guest which is not listed storage pool # virsh dumpxml avocado-vt-vm1 .... <disk type='file' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2'/> <source

On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 18:02:32 +0200 Harry Jede via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am Montag, 20. August 2018, 16:43:24 CEST schrieb Matthias Leopold > via samba: > > Hi, > > > > i (naively) would like to have local AND ldap users (and groups...) > > on my standalone fileserver (security = user). "passdb backend = > > ldapsam" already

Hi, I posted a similar question in 2018 with no answers, so I'll try again: Is it possible to have shares with Windows ACLs and shares with POSIX ACLs on the same server (security = user)? Since share permissions are handled differently for both types of shares I'm not sure if this will work. I know I could try it out myself, but the question again just came to my mind and I think

hi, i'm trying to import a VM in oVirt from a KVM host that doesn't use storage pools. this fails with the following message in /var/log/vdsm/vdsm.log: 2017-07-05 09:34:20,513+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/5) [root] Error getting disk size (v2v:1089) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/v2v.py", line 1078, in _get_disk_info vol =

Hi, I've been running a samba server with winbind (CentOS 7) as a member of an AD Domain (Windows 2012 R2) for several months without a problem. "Suddenly" I'm seeing the problem that the membership in newly created AD groups isn't correctly visible for some users on the samba server or only after some indefinite amount of time. I'm looking simply at the output of

Hi, we are using a _single_ LDAP server as backend for _multiple_ Samba standalone file servers (security=user). This LDAP server serves mainly other purposes and access for Samba is read only so the situation is not optimal but "it works for us". Still I don't understand one phenomenon concerning visibility of LDAP groups. The LDAP configuration in smb.conf for all our Samba

Am 14.11.19 um 22:12 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 14/11/2019 20:45, Matthias Leopold via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I posted a similar question in 2018 with no answers, so I'll try again: >> Is it possible to have shares with Windows ACLs and shares with POSIX >> ACLs on the same server (security = user)? Since share permissions are >> handled

Hi, just to be sure: can I use TDB databases that were created on ppc64 on a x86_64 platform? thx Matthias

Matthias, I used setfacl to set POSIX and Ad ACLS. Windows users who are in the appropriate group can manage perms for both. Cheers, Tim On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:43 PM Matthias Leopold via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 14.11.19 um 23:03 schrieb Jeremy Allison via samba: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:51:41AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba > wrote:

Hi, I'm trying to hide objects in Samba AD 4.12.3 for certain users. I found several tutorials, they all mention "List Object Mode" as an option. Is this supposed to work with Samba AD? I was able to enable it, but it doesn't seem to have any effect when I follow the recipes for hiding objects. When using the other option (deny "List contents") I had the problem