similar to: Inconsistent DNS after crash

On 17.01.19 16:22, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Rule 1, if you have another running DC, do not recover a DC from a > backup. I see. I have recover the backup a second time in a test env without network. Now it look like OK. my plan: 1. shutdown dc2 2. start dc1 with network 3. and now ??? can I already start dc2? Or should I start it without network and delete all DNS entries? I

there is the same problem. My setup is as follow: router (DHCP/Bind as forwarder dc1 and dc2) /etc/dhcpd.conf option domain-name-servers 192.168.30.2, 192.168.30.6; dc1 (192.168.30.2) / dc2 (192.168.30.6) are domain Controller with bind_dlz DNS, dc2 is update via axfr dc1 ist dns master and where I see the errors. client 192.168.30.175#55454: update 'samdom.example.com/IN' denied

OK I have done and ad an reverse zone to my ad. manual added values are found now. Automatic updates (by client like ipconfig /renew) are still denied. Am 12.04.2017 um 13:28 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:12:42 +0200 > basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> In named.conf.local I have a reverse zone >> >> zone

On 10.07.20 13:01, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 10/07/2020 11:45, basti via samba wrote: >> >> On 10.07.20 12:39, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> >>>>> What OS and version is this ? >>>> debian 10 >>>>> What Samba version ? >>>> 2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1 >>>> >>>> only winbind installed.

On 10.07.20 12:39, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> What OS and version is this ? >> debian 10 >>> What Samba version ? >> 2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1 >> >> only winbind installed. > So you only require authentication > > Have you tried restarting winbind ? yes, restart winbind, network and the hole system does not help I have start winbind in

Hello, i have a Samba AD Domain with multiple DC's at the moment all client are connectet to printer via dc2. Is theere a way to connect then in a failover mode? (in other words print via dc1 of dc2 is down) Best Regards Basti

Hi all, I am experiencing strange behaviour regarding DNS resolution with my samba-driven AD. This is with Debian-packaged samba on raspberry Pi: # samba -V Version 4.19.5-Debian # uname -a Linux dc3.ad.mydomain.tld 6.1.0-rpi8-rpi-v8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Debian 1:6.1.73-1+rpt1 (2024-01-25) aarch64 GNU/Linux I would expect that every DNS server of the domain would respond with the same SOA record. But

Only thing i see to do this is setup a clustert print server. I cant tell if its possible with samba. ( sorry ) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > basti via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 26 april 2017 16:39 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba AD Printer Failover >

Hello, after demote and rejoun my dc2 i have problems with replication. First of all some srv records on dc1 are missing, on dc2 they are exist. root at dc2:~# dig srv _ldap._tcp.ForestDnsZones.samdom.example.com @dc2.samdom.example.com. ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u1-Debian <<>> srv _ldap._tcp.ForestDnsZones.samdom.example.com @dc2.samdom.example.com. ;; global

The update with the dhcp script work for now. I'm not sure if it works since I add "allow dns updates = nonsecure" or if it works after a service restart. I will test if it is useable for me. Thanks rowland for now. Am 12.04.2017 um 15:26 schrieb basti via samba: > there is the same problem. > > My setup is as follow: > > router (DHCP/Bind as forwarder dc1 and

hi again. after some tests, (on my operational domain and on a new testdomain) i detected this behavior: on samba 4.11.6 sometimes the new DNS-records finisches on a wrong dns zone. the problem occurs, if more then 5 records are created with the same name in more then one domain zone for example: testa1.jupiter.mydom.org testa2.jupiter.mydom.org testa3.jupiter.mydom.org

2 debian-DCs ... I get Last attempt @ Wed Mar 13 10:57:11 2019 CET failed, result 121 (WERR_SEM_TIMEOUT) How to proceed here (yes, I google ...), please ...

Hello, I have try to add a new DNS Server to a existing Samba AD with bind DLZ. I have try https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration#Adding_new_records A New NS Record is add, on the old DNS dig show the new NS entry but that is not shown on the backup dns. The backup DNS is youn to domain. samba-tool drs showrepl looks good Is there a command to join a new dns server to the samba ad?

Hai Christian, > Can someone reproduce this? No, tried, but sorry, works fine for me on my 4.11.6 server. And what is you try it like this. samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 0.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone1.domain.de -U Administrator samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone2.domain.de -U Administrator I tested on my production where i have 6

Hello, I have installed an samba ad1 and an samba ad2 with replication. On the dc1 "samba-tool drs showrepl" say "... was successful" On dc2 there is the same. When dc1 goes down I get an Error (on my client): Active Directory Users and Computers error: "server is not operational" What is wrong here? For my understand that is no Replication, when one goes down and

Hello is there a way to use dnsvi with samba bind_dlz? When i use this i get error update failed: NOTAUTH

On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 11:22 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Debian 8 ? 9? > DC's samba version ? > > Can you post your smb.conf and resolv.conf > > If you check with (per server what is the outcome. ) > samba-tool dbcheck > samba-tool dbcheck --cross-nc > > You could do a forced sync of a good server to the bad one. >

I joined a Windows 10 Pro system to my (still experimental) domain. The windows system actually hosts DC2 as a VM, and another Windows (Server 2008 R2) at another location hosts DC1 also as a VM. The two locations are connected via a VPN, both systems run only when needed. The windows system does not directly use DC2 for DNS but instead talks to a DNS resolver that delegates the samba Domain to

On 11/20/2015 7:40 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 20.11.2015 um 11:54 schrieb mathias dufresne: >> Hi Ole, >> >> I'm still not answering your issue but I come back to speak about >> TTL. Perhaps someone would be able to bring us some light on that. >> >> This morning I'm trying to reproduce the way I do broke my test AD >> domain. This

On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 07:38 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:59:29 +0000 > Sérgio Basto via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 11:22 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle via samba > > wrote: > > > Hi Stefan, > > > > > > Debian 8 ? 9? > > > DC's samba version ? > > >