similar to: GPO or similar for fedora?

The DC is a Ubuntu 16.04, with samba 4.8 I want a local user in alls workstations with admin permissions, is for the support area, for install apps and if i make a freeipa and make the trust? i could have the users and GPOs for windows and users and tools for linux, is possible? El lun., 14 ene. 2019 a las 17:26, Rowland Penny via samba (< samba at lists.samba.org>) escribió: > On

This is beacuse all workstations are windows, but we are thinking migrate to fedora. i already have all the users in samba DC. We access to internet and others apps with user from DC. because of that, we need both systems for now El lun., 14 ene. 2019 a las 18:23, Rowland Penny via samba (< samba at lists.samba.org>) escribió: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:57:26 -0300 > Carlos Bordon via

Hi people I have a questions, i have 3 domain controllers, all with samba dc2 with dc1 drs is perfect dc3 with dc1 drs is perfect but dc2 with dc3 i have errors: WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED in CN=Configuration, DC =DomainDNsZonesm anda DC= ForestDnsZones have you any idea what can do? Sorry for my english, i am from Argentine.

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:57:26 -0300 Carlos Bordon via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > The DC is a Ubuntu 16.04, with samba 4.8 > > I want a local user in alls workstations with admin permissions, is > for the support area, for install apps If you mean a local Unix admin user, as in one stored in /etc/passwd and using sudo, then this easy, just create one during the OS

I have a bunch of W2K clients on my network and I want to be able to use GPOs, but REFUSE to go the M$ route ;-) Since GPOs are essentially registry entries, it might be somewhat easy to implement a simple program that could give admins that fine-grain control that is missing from NT4-style .pol files. What I would like to propose is a simple Win32 executable that could read from an

Hello, I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a single user, listing all GPOs is working: ------------------ root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} display name : Default Domain Policy path : \\example2.net\sysvol\example2.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} dn :

dont chown, dont run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset. just fix the rights from windows and test. if the win event log is ok, then dont touch sysvol again, only setup/change gpo's. if gpos dont work, what is the event id and error message. greetz, Louis ps im sick and only mail available so im bit slow in responce. > Op 8 jul. 2017 om 10:42 heeft Stefan G. Weichinger via samba

Has anyone found a workaround for Samba print servers? https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/030ee94a-047d-460a-bc39-52351a199364/kb31639 12-breaks-point-and-print-restrictions-gpo-settings If I set the GPOs as stated on the WIKI (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Automatic _Printer_Driver_Downloads_for_Windows_Clients) Windows 10 refuses to install the driver with "a

On 14/04/2023 15:51, Anderson Sampaio Mello via samba wrote: > Thanks everyone for the reply. > > But actually the samba documentation: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Group_Policy#SSSD > > and from David Mulder(dmulder): > > https://dmulder.github.io/group-policy-book/policy-refresh.html#sssd-refresh > > It makes it clear that sssd does support samba AD

Ok, so yesterday it worked. Can you run this for me and mail me the output, i have a quick check. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh And https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-check-db-repl.sh Last, have you check for corrupted filesystem and/or file/folders? Any updates done last days? Now maybe, just maybe, and this

On 2/6/2018 2:03 PM, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: > On 02/06/2018 02:52 PM, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: >> On 2/6/2018 1:42 PM, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: >>> On 02/06/2018 01:44 PM, Micha Ballmann via samba wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> i have a testing environment, 2 DCs Ubuntu 18.04, SAMBA 4.7.4 - MIT >>>> Kerberos

Hi all, Just another GPO Permissions question. I'm trying to track down why some GPOs are essentially invisible to the clients, even though they exist in GPM and the files exist. So, they aren't being applied or denied. What's the current wisdom on GPO ownership? In GPM, the applicable object is "owned" by Domain Admins, but the \\DC\sysvol\SAMDOM\Policies\{UUID} should

mmm Very interesting. and...if i have 3 DCS and i change the passwords in principal but, the audit is in other DC, I suppose that by replicating the change in the other DCS the auditor will work, right? El mié., 26 sept. 2018 a las 13:54, Denis Cardon (<dcardon at tranquil.it>) escribió: > Hi > > > Good morning people from Argentine. > > > > again bothering with a

ok, do the following. set ignore systemacl to yes on sysvol and netlogon. login as dom\administrator computer manager, connect to dc. share sysvol, goto share security, reset to defalts. same for folder. goto gpo manager, klik on every gpo object, if one has wrong acl, you get a message to reset it, thats ok. now never samba-tool sysvol reset if you do, you might need to set share/file

Hi list, Today, I spent most of the day figuring out why my password policies set via GPO are not applied on a domain level, just to find out that this is not one of the many occasions where Windows is the problem but it's really Samba, for a change. Apparently, password policies can only be changed using samba-tool and not via GPO. IMO, the FAQ is not very clear here.

Hello, we have a strange problem with the "Default Domain Policy". Sometimes on different PC the drivmappings are not working. When we do a "gpupdate /force" we get an errormessage that the "default domain policy" is not working for both the user-GPOs and the machine-GPOs. We checked the permissions with "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" and with

Hello, we have an Ubuntu 20.04 that was upgraded a while ago from a 16.04, samba Version is 4.13.17. The Server is a fileserver and a samba domain controller. Everything looked fine and we barely use GPOs, it was required to add a a group to a GPO security filter and it does not work, it worked when it was Ubuntu 16.04 I don't know of the Version in the past. There is no error message,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hallo, when I do an "samba-tool gpo list username" I get an "faild access check on OU=name,......". But not if I do a "samba-tool gpo listall" then everything is ok. Is this normal? If I take "administrator" as username I didn't get this message. Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2

> On 04 Jun 2016, at 22:14, Miguel Medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > > >> Can someone therefore please explain to me what exactly these GPO >> restrictions are that Samba can't handle? I'd also appreciate if someone >> could list which other GPO I cannot set successfully using RSAT. > > It seems to me that the FAQ is pretty clear. The

I'm having problems with GPO in Samba 4.2.1 I created a GPO to Block Control Panel and applied in my Domain OU. In desktop client I typed "gpupdate /force" and appear a success message that to ask reboot my system. After rebuot the GPO don't work. Other GPOs as WSUS update, Wallpaper and others, don't work too. Following is the result of command: GPRESULT /H