similar to: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable

PRIOR THREAD: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-January/220292.html In the  referenced prior thread, I had an issue of samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names causing a dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable error. Ultimately, the solution kindly provided by Rowland was to insert dns update command = /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --use-samba-tool into the [global] section of

Okay, because you are not wrong ... One more time before I move forward with this. The smb.conf is now: # Global parameters [global]         bind interfaces only = Yes         interfaces = lo eno1         netbios name = DC01         realm = CORP.<DOMAIN>.COM         server role = active directory domain controller         server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl,

On 7/3/2020 10:01 AM, Robert E. Wooden via samba wrote: > On 7/3/2020 9:50 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> Originally, Samba used /var/lib/samba/private for the dns.keytab and >> other dns files. This was then found to be possibly insecure, so it >> was decided to use /var/lib/samba/bind-dns instead. When you upgrade >> the Samba packages, the old files are not

As the subject says, dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable. I have internet searched for solutions. I have done everything on /wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable/ and I am still getting: At the end of "root at dc01:~# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names": dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable Failed nsupdate: 1 Failed update of 29

On Friday, January 11, 2019 11:20 AM, Billy Bob via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:     On Friday, January 11, 2019 10:44 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: >>> Here is what the logs show WITHOUT the -d option: >>> >>> Jan

Hi, I have a test system with two DCs based on samba v 4.8.0 with BIND9_DLZ as the dns backend running on a fresh install of Gentoo. I can't get DNS Updates to work on both DCs. If I issue the command: samba_dnsupdate --verbose after the 2nd DC has joined the domain I get the errors (just showing the last entry): update(nsupdate): SRV

On 03/07/2020 14:39, Robert E. Wooden via samba wrote: > As the subject says, dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable. > > I have internet searched for solutions. > > I have done everything on > /wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable/ > and I am still getting: > > At the end of "root at dc01:~# samba_dnsupdate --verbose

On Friday, January 11, 2019 10:44 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: >> Here is what the logs show WITHOUT the -d option: >> >> Jan 11 10:00:36 dc01 dhcpd[1704]: Commit: IP: 172.20.10.165 DHCID: >> 1:d4:be:d9:22:9f:7d Name: mgmt01 Jan 11 10:00:36

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Friday, January 11, 2019 11:20 AM, Billy Bob via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >     On Friday, January 11, 2019 10:44 AM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2019

On Friday, January 11, 2019 3:14 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >I have no idea where the above is coming from, but it isn't from the dhcp scripts. > I don't know what to tell you, Rowland. The previous logs were with the -d option in place, and those extra lines were what was added as a result of the -d option. Here is what the logs

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:56 PM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >Uncomment line 10, adjust it for prefix if Samba isn't in /usr/local and then try again. > Here it is with script properly configured. > Regarding

On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:56 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >Uncomment line 10, adjust it for prefix if Samba isn't in /usr/local >and then try again. Here it is with script properly configured. Regarding the later lines having to do with the script, I clearly don't know what exactly is causing them. But surely they are all somehow part

On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:33 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:18:37 +0000 (UTC)> >Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > >>  >> >>    On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:08 PM, Billy Bob via samba >> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >Do you want to change your

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:33 PM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:18:37 +0000 (UTC)> > >Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >>  > >> >

On Friday, January 11, 2019 12:04 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:   > OK, you are now running my scripts as found on the Samba wiki, so it > should work. > > Lets check some things, can you post the contents of the following > files: > > /etc/resolv.conf search corp.<DOMAIN>.com# nameserver 172.20.10.131nameserver 172.20.10.130

Call me dense, but now I am more confused. I have tried with and without quotes ... all over the place (i.e. in the smb.config and on the command line) and everything still results in errors, although not always exactly the same. Messing with the command line results in things like this: ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (9711, 'WERR_DNS_ERROR_RECORD_ALREADY_EXISTS')   File

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, January 11, 2019 3:14 AM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >I have no idea where the above is coming from, but it isn't from > >the dhcp scripts. > > > > I don't know what to tell you,

On 7/3/2020 9:50 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > I thought I explained that, but lets try again ;-) > > Originally, Samba used /var/lib/samba/private for the dns.keytab and > other dns files. This was then found to be possibly insecure, so it > was decided to use /var/lib/samba/bind-dns instead. When you upgrade > the Samba packages, the old files are not removed, but the

On 12/08/2019 20:19, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hi Rowland, > did read, actually cited the page it myself, but didn?t help me to identify the cause. > Kerberos credentials exists, dns users exists, file permission are correct. So either that is insufficient or I am blind.. > Regards, Joachim > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba <samba-bounces at

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @