similar to: idmap problems

I've spent some time updating, upgrading and generally consolidating an old Samba AD. I've managed to remove a very old unsupported (4.2) Samba AD DC following migration to a couple of new DC's - that seems to have worked out OK. Workstation logons and GPO's working fine. I'm now left with one problem after joining a new Samba (4.5.12) member server to the domain for file

Unfortunately, the the Ubuntu 18.04 samba-tool package doesn't have "user show" as an option. The Windows ADUC tool shows user1 uidNumber =10001, user2 uidNumber=10002, user3 uidNumber =10003, and user4 uidNumber=10004 Here are the getent command results on the file server/ domain member: *admin at fsvr0:~$ getent passwd user1* hq-user1:*:11103:10513::/home/lan/user1:/bin/bash

Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed user names: drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2 drwx------ 92 DOM\user3        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 16 08:39 user3 drwx------   3        133265        DOM\domain-user   4096 Sep  7 2015 user4 drwx------   7       

Hi, no, that's my fault. I changed the UIDs and user names in my "ls -l" to unpersonalized/example data for my mail and didn't think about putting these values into the range. A better unpersonalized data example would look like: ---------- drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\group  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\group  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2

On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:54:17 +0100 Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed > user names: > > drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 > user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 11 > 08:13 user2 drwx------ 92 DOM\user3       

Hi Andreas, i'm sorry to jump on your thread as i can't really help you here. But as i have to setup an AD subdomain of a parent domain with the same requirements as yours apparently (aka parent domain managed by Windows server holds users/groups accounts on a distant location but the compute ressources and the GPO will be managed locally under a subdomain), i'm just wondering if you

Dovecot version 2.1.7 Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS Kernel 3.2.0-35-generic x86_64 I'm not sure exactly when this started occurring, but sporatically users report issues receiving email, having email saved to "Sent," etc. Looking in dovecot.log, I see the following errors: 2013-10-16 09:53:20 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<user1>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=27434,

> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 14:42:39 +0000 > Rob Mason <rob at acasta.co.uk<mailto:rob at acasta.co.uk>>> wrote: > >> Many thanks Rowland. Yes, I don't understand idmaps, but I _think_ >> I'm getting it. I have added the gid of 60002 for Domain Admins and >> undertaken some 'chgrp' tasks. I've now got a domain member with >>

Hello all, I'm quite new as well to Dovecot, just installed it on a FreeBSD system with Postfix and Rspamd as side apps. Things are running semi-smoothly for all users but I do have quite a few errors in the logs : Oct 13 19:43:56 apollo dovecot[24478]: imap(user1)<34412><zIeI9ZCxXDmsFhZG>: Fatal: setgid(1030(user1) from userdb lookup) failed with euid=1022(user4),

Hi, I'm Tachibana. Additionally, I found below: dovecot/src/plugins/fts/fts-build-mail.c: 187 i_debug("@@@@@ befor address parse:%s",hdr->full_value); 188 189 addr = message_address_parse(pool_datastack_create(), 190 hdr->full_value, 191

Hello all, I have samba 3 with a share named shareA using these settings: [shareA] comment = Directory Amministrazione path = /col/shareA browseable = no valid users = @amm force group = amm public = no writable = yes create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 printable = no where user1, user2, user3 and user4 belong to "amm" group. I would like to

On 1/08/2016 10:01 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 7/31/2016 om 4:27 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: >> Hi, >> >> I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two >> hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. >> Has anyone else experienced the replication problem? Are sieve >> scripts actually replicating in live time for

Hi, Not sure if this is it, but I used to have the same error when I started with dovecot. Aki's response was the following (and solved my problem). ------------- Hi! You can't set service imap { service_count = 256 } if you are using multiple system UIDs. See https://wiki.dovecot.org/Services#imap.2C_pop3.2C_submission.2C_managesieve *service_count* can be changed from 1 if only a

Hi, yes, there are some things. But I have not found a nice complete documentation. One main point is the domain name as prefix of the username of the parent domain, e.g. "DOM\user1", you have to use. I was not able to get rid of it, as the client is member of the subdomain which is the default. So you can't use the "default domain" option in smb.conf. The backslash

Hi, This To field was not correct indexed by FTS. To: Yamada Taro <yamada at example.com>,=?UTF-8?B?dXNlcjJAZXhhbXBsZS5jb20=?= <user2 at example.com>, =?UTF-8?B?dXNlcjNAZXhhbXBsZS5jb20=?= <user3 at example.com>, user4 desu <user4 at example.com> --> Yamada Taro <yamada at example.com> , user2 at example.com And follow was correct indexed by FTS To: Yamada

On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:20:52 +0100 Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > no, that's my fault. I changed the UIDs and user names in my "ls -l" > to unpersonalized/example data for my mail and didn't think about > putting these values into the range. A better unpersonalized data > example would look like: > >

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 20:24:13 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm Tachibana. > Additionally, I found below: > > dovecot/src/plugins/fts/fts-build-mail.c: > > 187 i_debug("@@@@@ befor address parse:%s",hdr->full_value); > 188 > 189 addr = message_address_parse(pool_datastack_create(), >

Am 16.01.2018 um 17:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:54:17 +0100 > Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed >> user names: >> >> drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 >> user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2       

I have a client with a linux server with samba installed and I've created users using the smbpasswd command (user1,user2,user3...) but when I go to the XP machines they can see the different shares but are unable to write to the folders or create additional folders based on their user1 and password. I want them to validate themselves to the linux server so that if their domain goes down they

On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:22:44 +0100 Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > we are running a file server as member server of a windows 2012 > domain. Now we are facing the problem, that some UIDs are not mapped > to the user names by the running winbindd process. This results in > "nobody" usernames for nfs shares mounted by other