similar to: guest access

Hi, list I install samba 4.10.3 on centos. I want to change the password after the first login by the user. Tanks,

Hi List I want to install samba 4.10.2 on centos. but after run the ./configure command show "/usr/bin/env: python3: no such file or directory" how to fix this problem, my friends. tanks.

On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 14:42:46 +0330 sam zand <zand.nas.storage at gmail.com> wrote: > Did I understand correctly??? > I cannot directly connect to one share with the guest user in AD > samba. If your user is an AD user, connecting from a domain member, then they will never be a guest user. If you must have guest access (why ?), then set up another samba instance as a standalone

On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 15:48:37 +0330 sam zand <zand.nas.storage at gmail.com> wrote: > I have 50 users in a network. for 40 user defined username and > password but 10 users alone want to connect to one public share the > is common for 50 users. > what is the best smb.conf for the scenario? > very thanks for answer the questions me > First, do not use the DC as a

Hello Samba experts, I have just successfully replaced the old default Thecus Samba version 3.5.16 on my Thecus NAS (32-bit Intel Atom, 3 GB RAM, i686 Thecus kernel 2.6.33) by a current Samba 4.6.5 build that I have cross-compiled myself from scratch. Note that so far, I am using the unchanged (i.e. exactly identical) old 3.5.16 smb.conf file for 4.6.5. Everything seems to work fine in

Hello again, Jeremy and other Samba experts, I'm sorry to be such a pain in your neck(s), but I still need your help in looking for help trying to find out why SMB2/3.1.1 in Samba 4.6.5 performs so much worse than SMB/1.5 in Samba 3.6.15 in scenarios with a huge number of small files. As requested by Jeremy, I have done wireshark "pcapng" captures of the four scenarios as

Hi friend, thanks fore your helps, but, you allow still i explain more about my problem, I setup DC but windows clients dont join in DC, how can increase speed? or how i have AD feature in samba without decrease performance? thanks, On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Andreas Heinlein via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 04.12.2017 um 11:03 schrieb sam zand via samba: >

Hi dears, how are you? my friends, i installed samba 4.7 on centos 7 , i need to use Active Directory in Samba, i connect to sharing with windows client, through user and pass samba AD, i use 1G ethernet connection between client and file server, but when i copy a file from windows to file server, speed copy is about 30-50 MB/s (show in copy progress in windows), while before i use from samba

Hello Jeremy, thanks a million for your help and interest in tracking this down! :-) Am 13.06.2017 um 18:36 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > Can you get comparitive wireshark traces for the two cases ? > > That would help discover what the bottleneck is. I am not at all a network guy, but I hope that - maybe with a little more help from your part once I have tried to do so in practice - I

Hi All Is there a tool to monitor qemu-kvm guest vm memory usage ( free in guest vm)?Nowadays, I have already researched some methods:1. qemu-kvm process memory usage.? ? ?Since qemu-kvm process memory usage always increases as time goes on, it will not reflect the memory usage in vm.2.?virsh dommemstat? ? ?Just as method 1.3.?virsh qemu-monitor-command --hmp [domain name] "info mem"? ?

On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 11:28 +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > and many thanks for your fast reply! :-) > > Am 08.06.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > > I think the key to avoiding the issue is that you have listed rpc > > modules which are not modules. The only rpc server module is > > rpc_mdssvc_module. > > Ah, OK, I see - so I

I want to move all my OS, services like Apache configuration and application (web server) files and folders to another brand new server. Both servers are running on Centos 7. i want to clone everything. My questions 1- what is the easiest way to do this? 2- do I need to partition hard-drive of new server exactly as old one? 3- Is there any changes to make on new server after full migration? 4-

hi, all: I'm now working on constructing KVM servers based on glusterfs. After many times searching on web, i found just a little information for this task, so I had to write this email for seeking systematically instruction of how to make glusterfs and KVM working together perfectly. And here are some questions I can not find any clearly answers: 1. what are the

In order to take advantages of Paolo's multi-queue virito-scsi, we need multi-target support in tcm_vhost first. Otherwise all the requests go to one queue and other queues are idle. This patch makes: 1. All the targets under the wwpn is seen and can be used by guest. 2. No need to pass the tpgt number in struct vhost_scsi_target to tcm_vhost.ko. Only wwpn is needed. 3. We can always pass

In order to take advantages of Paolo's multi-queue virito-scsi, we need multi-target support in tcm_vhost first. Otherwise all the requests go to one queue and other queues are idle. This patch makes: 1. All the targets under the wwpn is seen and can be used by guest. 2. No need to pass the tpgt number in struct vhost_scsi_target to tcm_vhost.ko. Only wwpn is needed. 3. We can always pass

Here's the scenario I'm experiencing: Laptop - joined to a corporate domain that enforces smart card authentication Home NAS - running Samba with a guest share for home users When I try to access the NAS share from my laptop, it pops up an error saying "<network path> is not accessable. An unexpected network error occurred." I'm not sure where to begin

In order to take advantages of Paolo's multi-queue virito-scsi, we need multi-target support in tcm_vhost first. Otherwise all the requests go to one queue and other queues are idle. This patch makes: 1. All the targets under the wwpn is seen and can be used by guest. 2. No need to pass the tpgt number in struct vhost_scsi_target to tcm_vhost.ko. Only wwpn is needed. 3. We can always pass

In order to take advantages of Paolo's multi-queue virito-scsi, we need multi-target support in tcm_vhost first. Otherwise all the requests go to one queue and other queues are idle. This patch makes: 1. All the targets under the wwpn is seen and can be used by guest. 2. No need to pass the tpgt number in struct vhost_scsi_target to tcm_vhost.ko. Only wwpn is needed. 3. We can always pass

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 11:02:45 -0400 > pisymbol <pisymbol at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Whoops! Replying to all! > > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018

I am experiencing challenges configuring optimal file permissions for a Samba share on my Raspberry Pi. My goal is to enable shared access for my wife, who uses an iPhone 13, to the directory |/mnt/shared/partage_de_fichiers| while preventing access to the main directory |/mnt/shared|. Here is my Samba configuration: ```[NAS] ?? comment = RaspberryPi ?? public = no ?? writable = yes ??