similar to: Samba 4.9, RSAT, Windows 10 - "Cannot Manage the operating System..."

On 1/2/2019 11:59 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 10:43:32 -0500 > Marco Shmerykowsky PE <marco at sce-engineers.com> wrote: > >>> /etc/hostname >> >> machine123 >> >>> /etc/hosts >> >> 127.0.0.1 localhost >> 127.0.1.1 machine123.company-internal.company.com machine123 > > The

On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 10:43:32 -0500 Marco Shmerykowsky PE <marco at sce-engineers.com> wrote: > > /etc/hostname > > machine123 > > > /etc/hosts > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > 127.0.1.1 machine123.company-internal.company.com machine123 The '127.0.1.1' should be the ipaddress of 'machine123' > > /etc/resolv.conf > #

On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:56:48 -0500 Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 12/5/2018 10:37 AM, Marco Shmerykowsky via samba wrote: > > On Wed, December 5, 2018 9:52 am, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:41:13 -0500 > >> Marco Shmerykowsky via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >>

On 2019-02-17 10:54 am, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 10:37:48 -0500 > Marco Shmerykowsky <marco at sce-engineers.com> wrote: > > >> >> Seems I can map a drive from the command line. (Didn't check that >> - it was 2:00am and I was tired with fighting this stuff) > > Time you went to bed ;-) > > its 15:45 Sun here. >

I tried the NTLM setting. No change. When I try to browse the network, I get the following error: "internal is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resource. The list of servers for this workgroup is not currently available." Here is the smb.conf from the AD machine. [global] netbios name = MACHINE251 realm = INTERNAL.DOMAIN.COM

I suggest reading this: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4034314/smbv1-is-not-installed-by-default-in-windows Imo, the longer you wait with samba AD the harder it gets to get things running. You could better spend you time on settting up and migrating to AD the keep putting time in a dying product. But thats my optinion. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >

I suggest you start with : 1770 /server (+ creator owner ) 3770 /server/programs ( + creator owner + creator group. ) Then check again with getfacl Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Shmerykowsky via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2019 23:13 > Aan: Rowland Penny > CC: samba at

On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 11:22:09 -0500 Marco Shmerykowsky PE <marco at sce-engineers.com> wrote: > On 12/28/2018 11:11 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 10:45:14 -0500 > > Marco Shmerykowsky <marco at sce-engineers.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 2018-12-28 10:37 am, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >

I have an old setup that serves my purposes, but which I'll move over to a more modern Samba4 setup at some point. I know it's old, deprecated etc. In any case, at the moment I'm having a problem with two Windows 10 machines connecting to the domain I set up. The network is a mix of XP, Windows 7 and Windows 10 machines. Four (4) windows 10 machines connect to the domain after the

On 2019-02-17 10:17 am, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 09:53:56 -0500 > Marco Shmerykowsky <marco at sce-engineers.com> wrote: > >> I tried the NTLM setting. No change. >> >> When I try to browse the network, I get the following error: >> >> "internal is not accessible. You might not have permission to >> use this

--- Marco J. Shmerykowsky, P.E. marco at sce-engineers.com -------------------------------------------- Shmerykowsky Consulting Engineers Structural Analysis & Design 102 West 38th Street, 2nd Floor New York, New York 10018 Tel. (212)719-9700 Fax. (212)719-4822 http://www.sce-engineers.com -------------------------------------------- On 2019-02-19 4:22

Thanks. Will check. I should have added that everything was working fine on the old winNT style samba domain setup. Its something related to the new samba AD setup On February 17, 2019 8:17:03 AM EST, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 07:51:24 -0500 >Marco Shmerykowsky via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> In

On 2019-02-19 3:47 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:25:51 -0500 >> What exactly does "START AGAIN" imply? Just chmod? > > 'ls' shows the correct ownership and Unix permissions: > > drwxrwx---+ 4 root domain admins 4096 Feb 17 19:13 programs > > But 'getfacl' show something different: > > getfacl:

On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:12:05 -0500 Marco Shmerykowsky <marco at sce-engineers.com> wrote: > > On 2019-02-21 10:57 am, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:39:47 -0500 > > Marco Shmerykowsky <marco at sce-engineers.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> On 2019-02-20 7:12 am, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> > On Wed, 20 Feb

On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 10:45:14 -0500 Marco Shmerykowsky <marco at sce-engineers.com> wrote: > > > On 2018-12-28 10:37 am, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 10:27:32 -0500 > > Marco Shmerykowsky via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> I'm trying to get an Samba AD setup. I thought I had RSAT working, >

On 2/25/2019 3:36 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai Marco, > > For you own domains, dont point postfix to your internal DNS only, > if done wrong you might miss dns info on the wan side and thats mostlikely your error . Likely. Here is the error (ignore the ip's - messed them up for this response): Feb 25 16:22:10 sce252 postfix/smtp[3114]: 0D1E86E3A6D: to=<marco

On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:39:47 -0500 Marco Shmerykowsky <marco at sce-engineers.com> wrote: > > On 2019-02-20 7:12 am, Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:02:55 +0000 > > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:05:12 +0000 > >> Rowland Penny via samba <samba at

Following the "User Home Folders" page on the wiki using Group Policy https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders I see this page was last updated in March 2017. Not sure if anything has changed. Although I can access the shares, the %LogonUser% directory does not seem to be automatically generating. Thoughts? Share definition: [users] path = /server/users read only = no

That parameter isn't defined in my main.cf file. Is I add it and leave it blank. It still doesn't work. On 2/25/2019 11:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 25.02.19 um 22:39 schrieb Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba: >> On 2/25/2019 3:36 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: >>> Hai Marco, >>> >>> For you own domains, dont point postfix to your

On 2019-02-19 1:58 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:26:12 -0500 > Marco Shmerykowsky via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> On 2019-02-18 11:46 am, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:58:01 -0500 >> > >> > I have proven that it does work, I have pointed you at the >> >