similar to: Samba with BIND9 DLZ affecting internet speed

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Samba with BIND9 DLZ affecting internet speed"

2018 Dec 07
2
Samba with BIND9 DLZ affecting internet speed
Hi there. Setup is Centos 7.4 with Samba 4.7.4. I In our second office I've got configured Centos 7.5 with latest samba ad + dlz, which I've set just as Andrew suggested, using separate bind9 that forwards queries to the samba AD(dlz) for the given dns zone. Unfortunately the office isn't operational yet, so I can't share any experience. Best On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:11 AM
2018 Dec 07
0
Samba with BIND9 DLZ affecting internet speed
Hai, As Andrew also told, setup a caching dns and forward the samba dns zones. This works great, i use this on 2 internet connected servers. What we (i) also want to know is your running OS and samba version. That does help us, yes, really.. ;-) A very simple to setup for a forwarding dns. Install bind9 on the ftp server. Set in the named.options. dnssec-enable yes;
2018 Jan 22
2
Samba 4.7.4 + bind9 DLZ /backend/ dropping delegated domain
Sure. It's actually a video, the part starts around 2:50 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSCJSVbFEfc On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:24:00 +0000 > Zdravko Zdravkov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Here's the problem. I've got working samba AD server.
2018 Jan 29
3
Samba 4.7.4 + bind9 DLZ /backend/ dropping delegated domain
Just a wild guess, but I and others have been having problems with samba_dlz, because of named "reload." Try to see if systemctl reload named and systemctl restart named break and fix the server respectively. (if your're not using systemd, try "serivice named reload", "service named restart instead") If you have a /etc/logrotate.d/named file containing
2018 Jan 22
2
Samba 4.7.4 + bind9 DLZ /backend/ dropping delegated domain
Here's the problem. I've got working samba AD server. I've configured it to work with bind9 DLZ backend and I'm managing the DNS entries from the windows DNS manager. I've made delegated DNS record for our EMC cluster storage, according to a guide. The record points to the SmartConnect service IP of the EMC. Since last week I've noticed that my DNS queries to the storage
2018 Jun 01
2
DNS not resolving particular host from queries from particular subnet
Hi all. Our setup is samba+dlz AD DC. Since last week the DNS doesn't resolve the delegated record for our storage *storage.domain.ltd* (192.168.26.xx) when being queried from clients in 192.168.29.0 which is our openvpn designated network. The OpenVPN is configured to push the DNS of our network, and also successfully resolves other hosts in the 192.168.26.0 subnet. I have no memory of
2019 Jun 28
4
AD DLZ backend - 'proper' way of doing it
Hey all. I've got working samba AD server with dlz backend. To avoid performance issues I'm using external DNS which forwards queries for the AD zone to the Samba server, like that: zone "myadzone.int" { > type forward; > forwarders { 192.xx.x.xx; }; > }; 192.xx.x.xx = my AD Samba. This way it works alright, but on the external DNS I'm getting
2018 Jun 01
2
DNS not resolving particular host from queries from particular subnet
True that! Sorry smb.conf > [global] > netbios name = AD > realm = XXXX.CO.UK > server role = active directory domain controller > server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, > winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate > workgroup = XXXX > idmap config XXXX:unix_nss_info = yes >
2019 Jun 28
2
AD DLZ backend - 'proper' way of doing it
Greetings Rowland. Are you able to provide sample config about this? I'm not sure how exactly to resolve single zone with BIND and forward everything else to the next dns server. Thank you for the help On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 11:55 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 28/06/2019 09:46, Zdravko Zdravkov via samba wrote: > > Hey all. > >
2019 May 04
2
Issues with bind9 dlz
Hi Rowland, Thank you. I think the 5 zones maybe a parsing issues somewhere. Also, the realms are in capital, must have been a typo. The UFW has been disabled and selinux is in a disbaled state /etc/bind/named.conf.options has options { directory "/var/cache/bind"; // If there is a firewall between you and nameservers you want // to talk to, you may need to
2019 Jan 12
2
Samba + BIND9 DLZ. DNS dosen't resolve FQDN, only short hostname
Thank You, Luis, Rowland, for the initial hints. I checked them all. As of system, it is Debian Strech, Bind 9.10.3, Samba 4.5.12 (I know it is old, but is native for distribution, and should work in such simple setup I suppose). I used this howto: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller As of hosts.conf, there are only localhost and
2019 May 04
2
Issues with bind9 dlz
Hi, We migrated the domain to AD on a ubuntu 18.04 box with samba 4.7.6. The DNS backend is DLZ We are seeing DNS issues as per below When using dnsupdate we get the following error. The server can resolve the hostname(itself) added interface eth0 ip=192.168.117.10 bcast=192.168.117.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 IPs: ['192.168.117.10'] need cache add: A server5.intdom.group 192.168.117.10
2019 Aug 05
6
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
On 05/08/2019 10:14, Patrik wrote: > I am not using flatfiles and i using BIND_DLZ it shows in my log and i > do not use flatfiles. BIND_DLZ only. Oh yes you are, you have this in your /etc/bind/named.conf.local : ??? zone "patrikx3.com" { ??????? type master; ??????? file "/etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com"; ??????? include
2018 Jan 30
1
Samba 4.7.4 + bind9 DLZ /backend/ dropping delegated domain
Fyi, I've been trying to get the devs to take notice of this problem. People keep pointing fingers. Samba says its Named/bind, bind says its the OS vendors.... See: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13214 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13230 Maybe I'll be forced to hack on the code myself to figure out what's really happening when a "reload" happens.
2018 Jan 29
0
Samba 4.7.4 + bind9 DLZ /backend/ dropping delegated domain
Bingo! That's it. I think I owe you a beer, mate :) On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Kristján Valur Jónsson via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Just a wild guess, but I and others have been having problems with > samba_dlz, because of named "reload." > Try to see if > systemctl reload named > and > systemctl restart named > break and fix the
2019 Aug 05
2
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
On 05/08/2019 10:29, Patrik wrote: > ok, so i remove that nemd.conf.update, but the rest it looks good? > *_ > _* These are my 'named.conf' files, used since 2012 with only minor changes: /etc/bind/named.conf include "/etc/bind/named.conf.options"; include "/etc/bind/named.conf.local"; include "/etc/bind/named.conf.default-zones";
2018 Jan 30
2
Samba 4.7.4 + bind9 DLZ /backend/ dropping delegated domain
Hai, Check the content of : /etc/logrotate.d/named If you see postrotate /etc/init.d/smbd reload > /dev/null endscript Change that to postrotate if [ -d /run/systemd/system ]; then; systemctl -q is-active named && systemctl reload named; else; /etc/init.d/named reload ; fi'; endscript Its something like that, so who pointing.. That does not matter, because this is OS
2020 Feb 28
4
Samba Bind DLZ Slow queries
Hello All, I hope you can assist me, I'm running Bind DLZ with our Samba AD DC environment Bind: BIND 9.11.4-P2-RedHat-9.11.4-9.P2.el7 (Extended Support Version) Samba: Version 4.11.6-SerNet-RedHat-9.el7 OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) My DNS queries seems to be hanging intermittently, taking anything from 1sec - 15sec or even timing out. I'm been monitoring the
2018 Jun 01
2
DNS not resolving particular host from queries from particular subnet
Hi Rowland. Trying the suggested named.conf broke the local resolve of the storage as well (for clients in 192.168.26.0), so I reverted back to my old one since I have computers here using the storage at the moment. Would you have any other suggestions? On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:12:43 +0100 >
2019 Aug 05
6
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
... From your output below.. >> Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version << Then tell uss, why are 3 lines uncommented? I suggest, run : https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh Anonimize it where needed, and show me your server setup. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: