similar to: Samba and firewalling

On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:53:29 +0100 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, >   > Just a questions, this might be a bug, might not, but for this one i > need some help. > Setup, debian 9. >   > Member server samba 4.9.3 > AD DC servers samba 4.8.7 >   > Im setting up the member with a very tight firewall, so nothing

Louis, Tried the rules you suggested: These work. I think that rules out any Windows problems. ufw insert 1 allow in on enp2s5 from 192.168.254.15 to 192.168.254.39 ufw insert 2 allow in on enp2s5 from 192.168.254.39 to 192.168.254.15 These do not work. ufw insert 1 allow in on enp2s5 proto tcp from 192.168.254.0/24 to 192.168.254.39 port 139,445 ufw insert 2 allow in on enp2s5 proto udp from

Here is the ufw.log after enabling logging medium and trying to connect to the windows net. Unfortunately the web Microsoft page is in German. I think it says window uses smb1 syntax. Jan 27 15:11:09 martin-RB042AV-ABA-a1410y kernel: [ 887.241685] [UFW BLOCK] IN=enp2s5 OUT= MAC=00:19:21:a2:11:5e:74:27:ea:ab:1e:e0:08:00 SRC=192.168.254.15 DST=192.168.254.39 LEN=90 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128

Reindl, I will check that. Not sure how fix it. Will look on internet. Would you give some more information on the subject. Thanks Sent from my iPad Marty (843)-546-4822 > On Jan 29, 2019, at 10:43 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > > >> Am 29.01.19 um 16:39 schrieb Marty via samba: >> Here is the ufw.log after enabling logging medium and

Here's the output: Feb 9 15:51:26 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:0f:ea:73:88:12:00:40:2b:67:5b:a7:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.54 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=51248 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1964 DPT=139 WINDOW=65535 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT (020405B401010402) Feb 9 15:51:28 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT=

Hi all, I''m tring to isolate P2P traffic, specifically BitTorrent, for my QoS scripts. I can''t seem to completely isolate ALL BitTorrent traffic. I identify & mark packets and then use tc filters to put them into appropriate classes. My firewall rules (below) do the markings. My VoIP boxes'' and ICMP traffic get highest priority (mark 1). Then comes DNS, SSH,

I have the problem when my localnetwork do telnet to the net Shorewall:FORWARD:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=eth2 my files are the following: policy #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL LIMIT:BURST loc net CONTINUE info loc fw ACCEPT info loc loc ACCEPT loc dmz ACCEPT info fw

I've been getting LOTS of messages like the below in the daily log, and from all indications, it appears to all be related to the cpu; the machine is just over a year old, and was the old vortex.wa4phy;net server from the downtown co-lo site. Aside from huge log files, and lots of other fluff, numerous problems of other nature have started cropping up. Anyone have any suggestions as to

I can see, that theres a program that keeps sending packets on port 25: Dec 27 14:11:46 a kernel: [ 6336.992320] O_D_LOG: IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=61533 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=37263 DPT=25 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Dec 27 14:12:01 a kernel: [ 6352.635704] O_D_LOG: IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=55853

Rowland, Thank you for all your help, I agree that this is not a Samba issue. Given rhat it works without the firewall. It' either a ufw or Windows 8.1 issue. Louis, Applied the rules you suggested to ufw exactly as written. No change. Still cannot connect with firewall enabled. Same error mesage as before "Cannot mount location ...". ufw log set to medium and copied below.

Hey First, apologies if this went out twice. I sent the original email from an odd email configuration (essentially from an alias of what I signed up as). I searched and noticed that my post did not appear and I did not get a bounce back so I was confused. I waited a few days before resending. So apologies if this goes out twice. I am not trying to spam. I was hoping someone could help me with

Hi All , My first message and I have a little problem with my FC6 box trying to block emule traffic using layer7 . Here my network : Internet --------- ADSL Router ------------------- FC6 Box -------------------- Emule Box external ADSL : Dynamic Internal ADSL : 192.168.254.1 external FC6 : 192.168.254.3 internal FC6 : 192.168.253.1 Emule Box : 192.168.253.3 I guess that everything

Hallo, i have a problem to configure shorewall to enable scanning over the network with sane. The scanner is located at the firewall hosts local interface. Why do i get a "all2all" message and not "loc2loc" Aug 25 14:55:26 router saned[26946]: saned from sane-backends 1.0.11 ready Aug 25 14:55:26 router saned[26946]: check_host: access by remote host: 192.168.0.250 Aug

I have problem getting answer on http request from all my local subnets but not from local subnet. Ping and requests on ports 21 22 23 25 110 works fine. I logged port 80 in rules files and I got accept entry same for local subnet and other subnets. Local subnet is 192.168.6 Dec 29 09:52:40 zinfsrv2 kernel: Shorewall:loc2fw:ACCEPT:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:09:6b:07:ca:cc:00:10:b5:fa:bd:71:08:00

Hi, I have seen this come up in a couple of threads, but nothing recent. I was wondering a couple of things and was hoping someone could clarify. I have an existing working shorewall configuration (Details at end of post). >From within this config, I have a few ports redirected for use with portsentry (like the mini-howto directs forbidden port accesses to port 49999). This works

Hi, I am getting occasional rejected packets like so: Jul 31 09:52:03 firewall kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth2 OUT=eth0 SRC=192.168.10.91 DST=132.147.22.6 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=127 ID=55364 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1147 DPT=23 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Jul 31 09:52:46 firewall kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth2 OUT=eth0 SRC=192.168.10.26 DST=10.9.100.30 LEN=48 TOS=0x00

Hi there, Let me just start by saying that I am a bit of a Linux newbie, but that Shorewall seems an excellant product. The issue I''m reporting wont stop me from using it, it still does 99% of what I need. Anyway, I have a resonably simple two interface system. My server (HatMannz, P3-900MHz with a RAID-1 array of 80GB IDE drives running Red Hat 9.0) connects to a cable modem via eth1

On my CentOS box that I use mainly as a web server, I have iptables set to log and reject anything that I don't expect. So lately, I have getting things like this: Mar 29 17:27:20 mbrc20 kernel: IPT-DROP IN= OUT=lo SRC=192.168.9.20 DST=192.168.9.20 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=46910 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=56624 DPT=80 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT

Hello, when I execute "shorewall hits" command I find this stats: HITS IP DATE ---- --------------- ------ 92099 192.168.0.2 Nov 24 7764 59.104.107.85 Nov 23 3997 192.168.1.77 Nov 24 337 181.50.93.89 Nov 23 331 59.104.156.68 Nov 23 315 99.109.157.73 Nov 23 301 190.225.157.40 Nov 23 275 179.153.183.53 Nov 23 268

I''ve had some issues with my network, and I''ve had to reconfigure my Gibraltar CD. It runs shorewall 1.4.8, and I have a 2-interface setup, so I downloaded the relevant files from the install page. Masq and such works, but I''m having a problem with my port forwarding. It works for port 22, but it doesn''t seem to work for any other port. I''ve turned