similar to: Samba package 4.9.x samba smbd not playing with winbind.

(@Rowland) > Whilst it is quite correct to say that the REALM isn't the same as a > DNS domain, there is a correlation between them. The REALM must be the > DNS domain in uppercase, so this: > > SAMBA_PRINCIPAL=dehydrated-service at YOUR.DOMAIN No, you can have your.primayDNSdomain.tld and have REALM = SOMEREALM.TLD Its not obligated to have REALM the same as the DnsDomain.

On 09/15/2018 03:40 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > It is undoubtedly for a 'standalone server', so why does it also have > the line 'domain master = Yes' ?? > It cannot be both, I would suggest removing this line. > > Rowland > > Rowland, domain master=yes used to be standard for stand-alone to cause nmbd claim a special domain specific

So it looks like the init script in the Samba package in the Debian repository needs to be edited for a non-DC home server. -- View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/4-2-14-Debian-Smbd-not-listening-on-192-168-0-x-on-cold-start-tp4720131p4720160.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hai, First he had problems with the suspend mode. See samba list subject : [Samba] Upgraded > Samba no longer listening on 192.168.0.x That got fixed, without changing any startup script, but by adding the interfaces line to smb.conf Now this one, ( sorry but winfried not attacking you, im attacting nobody ) And yes, that fix was from me to add that line, but not knowing you would hit the

Hai, If you read the post on the debian bug list. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909465 You wil seen the workaround also, thats tested and works. And I also suggest you adjest the startup order and to adjust your systemd settings is shown here. Use : systemct edit name_of_service.service This creates and override file in /etc/systemd/system/servicename.d/override.conf

Hai Rowland, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: maandag 14 januari 2019 12:48 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] dehydrated hook for LetsEncrypt certs > and samba dns (was: samba-tool auth in scripts) > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:13:19 +0100 >

On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 10:37 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 04:02:29 -0500 > "David C. Rankin via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On 09/15/2018 03:40 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > > > > > > > It is undoubtedly for a 'standalone server', so why does it also > >

hi everyone, I believe a resolution is there - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4367771 But what I'm hoping for is an expert would comment how would this apply to Samba with LDAP backend? many thanks, L.

On 05/10/2019 14:10, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/10/2019 13:41, lejeczek via samba wrote: >> hi everyone, >> >> I believe a resolution is there - >> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4367771 > Which is behind a paywall ;-) >> >> But what I'm hoping for is an expert would comment how >> would this apply >> to Samba with LDAP

Hullo, all. I diligently consulted the suggested reading on the way in: > Welcome to the rsync@lists.samba.org mailing list! PLEASE READ THIS > IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: > http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html 'Twas a quick read, given that I'm the co-author. ;-> I recently received an odd inquiry from someone I didn't know at all,

On 05/04/15 13:56, Luca Olivetti wrote: > El 05/04/15 a les 14:25, Rowland Penny ha escrit: > >> Well yes, but I wanted to show the OP the relation between what the >> uidNumber attribute holds and the range set in smb.conf. If what I >> propose works (and I sure it will), I would have then advised the OP to >> reset Domain Users back to 513, but I would also have

On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 02:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Winfried via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Forgot to give the smb.conf: > OK, it looks like you are trying to set up a standalone server with guest access, I suggest you read this wiki page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Standalone_Server You do not need most of the parameters you have added to smb.conf,

Hai Stefan, Yes, i do recommend the setup from 4.9 to 4.10 first. If you plan is to upgrade to buster. 1) on stretch, update samba to 4.10 2) Change apt sources do buster, * your now also able to add buster-samba411 of my repo. 3) apt-get dist upgrade --autoremove --purge And you able to upgrade to buster and samba 4.11. Do note, i should be possible to to it also from 4.9 to 4.11, but

On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 13:57 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 05:39:02 -0700 > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 10:37 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 04:02:29 -0500 > > > "David C. Rankin via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>

On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:28:29 +0200 Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Louis and Rowland, > > I'm just reporting back on this, in case it may help somebody else. > > Getting a working getent (or id) under the current version of CentOS > with winbind just doesn't seems possible. I haven't got a clue where > the problem is. I have

yes, I read https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.10.0.html and http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Upgrade-info.txt - Are there any particular things to consider when upgrading from 4.9.x to 4.10.x ? Talking of 2 DCs and 2 DMs here, debian-based. I assume it's better to only do the step to 4.10.x first and not to 4.11.x ? At first the DMs, then one DC ... ? thanks for any

On 15/09/2018 6:40 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:52:52 +1000 > Reuben Farrelly via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> thunderstorm ~ # testparm >> Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf >> rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit >> (16384) Processing section "[homes]" >>

Hai, There is nothing wrong with the debian script. If it does not work, ( like this one ), failing to start at boot time. The make the change i suggested, one of these 2 wil fix it. There are few know things, these involve these settings. interfaces = 192.168.0.1 127.0.0.1 Or interfaces = eth0 lo and bind interfaces only = yes 1) smb.conf: use "bind interfaces

Pretty close to what i have that : [global] workgroup = PRIVATE server string = %h server log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 log level = 0 ####### Authentication ####### ## stand alone everything open. security = user guest ok = yes map to guest = bad password ## map id's outside to domain to tdb files. idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap

Am 10.01.19 um 14:09 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > You don't ;-) > You do what the script should have done (I feel version 0.8.10 will > soon make an appearance), export the cache to use <export > KRB5CCNAME="/tmp/dhcp-dyndns.cc"> and then use '$KRB5CCNAME' wherever > '/tmp/dhcp-dyndns.cc' appears, except for: > [...] Yes, that worked.