similar to: Domain Admins default ownership is BUILTIN\Administrators

So, a little bit more investigation shows a problem with idmap -> User - BUILTIN\Administrator uid = 30000 Group - BUILTIN\Administrators gid = 3000000 Group - SAMDOM\Domain Admins gid = 60000 POSIX file ownership is becoming 3000000:60000 It seems that the Administrators group group is set as the owner. What's more, 'Administrators' group name is not mapped when I list the

Hi List I've spun up a fresh Debian 8 VM to test out the upgrade steps for a Debian samba 4.1.17 package deployment to a compiled samba 4.2.5. All seem s to work fine (apt-get remove samba first, followed by configure/make/install), but I get the following errors in my samba.log: samba: setproctitle not initialized, please either call setproctitle_init() or link against libbsd-ctor Is this

I’m looking to replace a DC within a small network by adding a new DC and transferring FMSO roles, then demoting the old DC (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC). I am able to successfully deploy the new DC following directions in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory. However, I am struggling with ID mappings – I’m not really

Hi Rowland - just wanted to follow up and say thanks. It was a dependency issue with pam. All sorted now. May I quickly double check that the current Samba wiki is correct - there is no automatic sysvol replication? Therefore, I must replicate my old DC sysvol to the new DC before transferring FMSO roles and demoting the old DC?? -----Original Message----- From: Rob Mason Sent: 26 November 2018

Hi Rowland - thank you for replying. I have now demoted and removed the temporary DC with the intention of repeating the exercise from scratch later this week. It was a Ubuntu Server 18.04.1 and the smb.conf was very vanilla: [global] workgroup = ACASTA realm = ACASTA.INTRA netbios name = UBUNTU server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder - 192.168.200.3 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 =

Hi Rowland - It was krb5-user, libpam-winbind and libnss-winbind. But this was partly due to not having the Universe repo installed from the Ubuntu 18 Live image (this has to manually added when using the live image). I've copied across idmap.ldb from the old (only) DC. Assuming no changes, I can just replicate Sysvol prior to migration? thanks -- Rob Mason -----Original Message----- On

Many thanks Rowland. Yes, I don't understand idmaps, but I _think_ I'm getting it. I have added the gid of 60002 for Domain Admins and undertaken some 'chgrp' tasks. I've now got a domain member with shares that presents the correct ownership. All looks good. I'm still slightly confused why I have two ranges within my member smb.conf: idmap config * : backend = tdb

I've spent some time updating, upgrading and generally consolidating an old Samba AD. I've managed to remove a very old unsupported (4.2) Samba AD DC following migration to a couple of new DC's - that seems to have worked out OK. Workstation logons and GPO's working fine. I'm now left with one problem after joining a new Samba (4.5.12) member server to the domain for file

Hi List, I am trialling a small Samba4 AD server supporting 10 users (running fine). I also have exim smtp and dovecot imap running on the same Debian Wheezy box. Simplistically, what I would like to achieve is for an AD user account to also authenticate to imap and smtp using the same credentials. I previously used Samba3 'unix password sync' to ensure that any domain users were

On 12/6/2018 3:40 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 17:36:43 -0500 > Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> On 12/5/2018 3:10 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> That sucks. I'm assuming Centos has the same problems? >>> >>> No, Centos has an even bigger

We've just received a bill from bt where it claims that we are making numerous calls to the same number time after time. e.g. 01226xxxxxx Barnsley 20/06/2007 2115 16:00:00 01226xxxxxx Barnsley 20/06/2007 1219 08:55:32 01226xxxxxx Barnsley 21/06/2007 2115 16:00:00 01226xxxxxx Barnsley 21/06/2007 1315 08:00:00 01226xxxxxx Barnsley 21/06/2007 0515 08:00:00 01226xxxxxx Barnsley 22/06/2007 2115

Hi Marius, If you're really using Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid lynx), the r-base package does not exist anymore on the repository (http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=r-base). You're version of Ubuntu is obsolete. If you want an Ubuntu LTS, you should upgrade to 14.04. >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 16:19:33 +1000 >> From: Marius Barnsley <mariusbarnsley at

Hi Again - following on from my last request for help, I'm now attempting to setup LDAP auth against my working samba4 AD. Simplistically, I'm trying initially to SSH into my AD server (working) using nslcd. I've tried method #1 from https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Local_user_management_and_authentication/ns lcd My simple config is: uid nslcd gid nslcd uri

Hello, Did you setup your sources as suggested here? http://cran.us.r-project.org/bin/linux/ Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 15, 2015, at 3:00 AM, r-sig-debian-request at r-project.org wrote: > > Send R-SIG-Debian mailing list submissions to > r-sig-debian at r-project.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

I am using Ubuntu 10.04 and have tried to download R-base with the following command: sudo apt-get install r-base and the following happens: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package r-base is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from

Hello everyone and Happy 2013! I have a situation -- the first ever I have come across -- which I don't understand. A friend was/is running Postfix and Dovecot - with default configs - nothing was ever changed :-) [root at mail home]# dovecot --version 0.99.11 Anyway, he had a problem with a user mailbox which I wasn't able to diagnose and fix easily. maillog showed: Jan 9 16:11:29

Hi, I have set-up dovecot on a F17 box and am encountering weirdnesses with SELinux (who isn't??). Again, I am trying to refrain from disabling SWLinux all together, however tempting, but am stuck in troubleshooting and hope for some ideas... With SELinux set to permissive, I can connect to dovecot and log in to access my mail as expected. With SELinux enforcing, I can connect to dovecot,

Hi, i'm getting a coredump on a specific msg, i've attached the gdb. file on disk i noticed W=<vsize> is missing. 1571209735.M744550P1608.rwvirtual65,S=15886:2,S Best regards, mail.log Oct 18 14:41:39 rwvirtual10 dovecot: imap(johndoe at company.nl)<15868><qjTFpy6VPsMKAAok>: Error: Mailbox INBOX.Debug: UID=1041: read(/data/mail/

I've found that the HTML help system started via help.start() requires all forward slashes in R_LIBS_USER otherwise the Packages page is corrupt/non-working. Note that by default R_LIBS_USER is set by R on startup. Example 1: With R_LIBS_USER=C:/Users/JohnDoe/R/win-library/2.10 > help.start() [and go to "Packages"] If nothing happens, you should open

Ok I played around a bit and activated debugging correctly (Thanks to Steffen) Now I try to log in with the user johndoe (that is his cn and his uid) and i get the following message in syslog: Mar 2 11:03:32 mailserver dovecot: auth: Debug: master in: REQUEST#0111283457025#0117428#0111#011d139b5d372d882643bc995003c615c89 Mar 2 11:03:32 mailserver dovecot: auth: Debug: