similar to: How to write a test for validates_uniqueness_of

Hello guys, Is there any way to match a render :nothing? I coudn''t find any way to do this so i''ve just changed my controllers to do a "head :ok", but it would be nice to know if there is any other way :) -- Maur?cio Linhares http://alinhavado.wordpress.com/ (pt-br) | http://blog.codevader.com/ (en) Jo?o Pessoa, PB, +55 83 8867-7208

Hello guys, I''m getting this weird error when trying to run the specs using "rake spec": /home/mauricio/NetBeansProjects/talkies/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_process.rb:471:in `method_missing'': undefined method `full_description'' for #<Spec::Rails::Example::ControllerExampleGroup::Subclass_73::Subclass_9:0x7f5fdca4a810>

Hello again :) I''m trying to run rcov on my specs here but i''m getting a lot of segmentation faults (and they usually happen at different places): /home/mauricio/NetBeansProjects/reeds/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb:211: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-24) [i486-linux]

Hello all, I was wondering if someone could give me a brief explanation of how :scope works. I believe I''ve seen it used with the validation helpers in the past. - Jim

I''ve just migrated my system over to a new macbook. I''ve been having a nightmare today trying to get the site I''m working on to work... All gems are in place, MySQL etc. However - I am stuck on this error form Mongrel: HTTP parse error, malformed request (127.0.0.1): #<Mongrel::HttpParserError: Invalid HTTP format, parsing fails.> The only thing it could be, I

Fyi, I made the following renames: * RailsExample -> RailsExampleGroup * FunctionalExample -> FunctionalExampleGroup * ControllerExample -> ControllerExampleGroup * ViewExample -> ViewExampleGroup * HelperExample -> HelperExampleGroup * ModelExample -> ModelExampleGroup This was done to keep the naming consistent with ExampleGroup.

Hello all, We know that memcached or memcached-client doesn''t support regex... But It seems it doesn''t support expire_fragment either :/ I''m trying to use expire_fragment with memcached as following : expire_fragment(:controller => ''home'', :action => :list_posts) But apparently it''s not supported by memcached : RuntimeError (Not

This is pretty much the same as last time around, if you recall. Thanks to Wilson for converting to the new form. I''ve added a few lines. Basically, it iterates over your model associations and does two things. - First, just try to call the association. Usually fixes speeling erors or other such silliness. - Second, try to find a record with an :include on the association. This

I need to modify the validates_uniqueness_of function so that it will check that the string is unique but only in its own category. For example right now I have validates_uniqueness_of :title so let''s say I have the :title "Title 1" already in the database with the :category of "1" then if i wanted to enter the :title "Title 1" in the database again BUT

Hi, I am trying to code an application that is based on Rspec; I am programmatically building examples, and launching the runner with a custom formatter. Here are the code snippets from my app: Launching the runner: example_groups = test_expectation.example_groups_for(system_state) @output = StringIO.new options =

Hello I''ve been using Acts_as_Parnoid for a while and it has been working well but I am now having a slight issue with it. I have a company table were I would like to use validates_uniqueness_of :company_name. This validation works if a company exists in the database and has not been deleted. However, I also would like the validates_uniqueness_of to work if a company has

Hi folks, I have a question regarding validates_uniqueness_of, and similar before-filter-like events attempting to guarantee some DB state prior to modification. >From my reading of ActiveRecord, validate_uniqueness_of appears to cause a SELECT on the underlying table attempting to ensure that a record with ID(s) specified in the validates_uniqueness_of statement is not already present, prior

Hi there, I am trying to deploy a rails app on dreamhost. Here is the error message that I get: fatal: ''home/USER_NAME/DOMAIN_NAME/git/APPLICATION_NAME.git'': unable to chdir or not a git archive fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly /Users/USER/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/capistrano-2.5.3/lib/capistrano/recipes/ deploy/scm/git.rb:224:in `query_revision'': Unable to resolve

I have the following ActiveRecord objects: class Recipe < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :ratings, :dependent => true . . . end class Rating < ActiveRecord::Base validates_uniqueness_of :created_by, :scope => :recipe_id belongs_to :recipe, :counter_cache => true . . . end The created_by field on Rating is implemented as a "magic" field similar to this:

I used validates_uniqueness_of it is case insensitive, it takes only admin not Admin. So please help me out how to put validates_uniqueness_of as case sensitive Thanks in Advance Surekha.Matte -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, I''m wanting to use Mocha and Stubba for my tests in place of the default Rails testing with fixtures. I have the following class: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base validates_uniqueness_of :email end and am wondering how I can test to ensure that the validates_uniqueness_of validation is running. Any ideas? -Jonathan

Is it possible to do a validates_uniqueness_of :name, :zip but only in that context? I''d like to be able to have that zip used again, but not in conjunction with a name already with that zip. Does that make sense? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, I am new to Ruby on rails and this is therefore probably trivial. Lets say I have 3 tables - users[id,name, age, ...], interests[id,name,description, ...], and finally a table user_interests[id,user_id,interest_id] to link a user to a set of interests. Now there is no problem to put validates_uniqueness_of :name in the user-model to ensure that I only have one Lenny, but how do I

I''m using restful_authentication to let users register and login. Lately, however, I''m seeing multiple login and emails being created even though I have validates_uniqueness_of as below: user.rb validates_uniqueness_of :login, :email, :case_sensitive => false mysql> select id, login, email, created_at, state from users;

Hey, we''re currently using shoulda (http://dev.thoughtbot.com/ shoulda/) on a project and I saw some things that would be really nice to see in rspec, namely the should_ methods, and especially the should_be_restful method. Do these go against the rspec goals at all? Or could an ambitious programmer go to town implementing these for rspec_on_rails? Nathan Sutton fowlduck at