similar to: Extending Samba-4 Schema to get Microsoft LAPS working

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Extending Samba-4 Schema to get Microsoft LAPS working"

2019 Jul 24
0
Extending Samba-4 Schema to get Microsoft LAPS working
Hi, I just did this a view days agon. These where the ldifs I used. laps_1.ldif dn: CN=ms-MCS-AdmPwd,CN=Schema,cn=configuration,DC=X changetype: add objectClass: attributeSchema ldapDisplayName: ms-MCS-AdmPwd adminDisplayName: ms-MCS-AdmPwd adminDescription: Stores password of local Administrator account on workstation attributeId:
2018 Nov 22
2
Extending Samba-4 Schema to get Microsoft LAPS working
Hi, I am using the command "ldbmodify -H path_to_sam_ldb automount_classes.ldif --option="dsdb:schema update allowed"=true" as given in the wiki. / / Using the above method I was able to add the two attributes. But I am not able to add these attributes to computers class. Hence looking for help to create the ldif file to add these two attributes to computer class. Best
2019 Jul 23
2
Extending Samba-4 Schema to get Microsoft LAPS working
Am 01.07.19 um 07:48 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 23.11.18 um 03:33 schrieb Ardos via samba: >> Hi, >> >> Thank you very much for your support. >> >> With your ldif, one of the attributes got added to computer container. >> Second one is having a trouble. The modification command is reporting it >> is not able to find the attribute
2018 Nov 23
4
Extending Samba-4 Schema to get Microsoft LAPS working
Hi, Thank you very much for your support. With your ldif, one of the attributes got added to computer container. Second one is having a trouble. The modification command is reporting it is not able to find the attribute although it is very much in the schema. I am checking this part out. Any suggestions to figure out what's wrong and correct it? Best regards, Raghavendra On 22/11/18
2018 Nov 22
0
Extending Samba-4 Schema to get Microsoft LAPS working
On Thu, 2018-11-22 at 09:58 +0530, Ardos via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to get the Microsoft LAPS working in my samba-4 AD > environment. Microsoft LAPS requires us to extend the schema and add two > attributes "ms-Mcs-AdmPwd" (Stores the password in plain text) and > "ms-Mcs-AdmPwdExpirationTime" (Stores the time to reset the password). > >
2018 Nov 22
0
Extending Samba-4 Schema to get Microsoft LAPS working
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 11:21:14 +0530 Ardos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I am using the command "ldbmodify -H path_to_sam_ldb > automount_classes.ldif --option="dsdb:schema update allowed"=true" as > given in the wiki. / > / > > Using the above method I was able to add the two attributes. But I am > not able to add
2023 Apr 28
1
LAPS support
Le 28/04/2023 ? 09:51, Arnaud FLORENT via samba a ?crit?: > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 09:40, Arnaud FLORENT via samba a ?crit?: >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 09:12, Arnaud FLORENT via samba a ?crit?: >>> >>> Le 28/04/2023 ? 01:03, Andrew Bartlett via samba a ?crit?: >>>> On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 18:18 +0200, Arnaud FLORENT via samba wrote: >>>>> so it
2023 May 03
1
LAPS support
finally i got LAPS GPO working ( there was errors in my first schema update ldif files) i had to set "Enable password encryption" to disabled in LAPS GPO. after reading wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_schema_extensions), before install on production, i would like to have some advice should i wait for this schema update to be integrated in samba source, or this
2023 Apr 12
1
LAPS support
On 12/04/2023 09:12, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > Op 12-04-2023 om 09:57 schreef Rowland Penny via samba: >> >> >> On 12/04/2023 08:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >>> >>> Op 12-04-2023 om 09:47 schreef Arnaud FLORENT via samba: >>>> Hello everybody >>>> >>>> >>>> does/will samba AD support t
2023 Apr 12
2
LAPS support
Op 12-04-2023 om 09:57 schreef Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 12/04/2023 08:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >> >> Op 12-04-2023 om 09:47 schreef Arnaud FLORENT via samba: >>> Hello everybody >>> >>> >>> does/will samba AD support t LAPS GPO ? >>> >>>
2023 Apr 12
1
LAPS support
Hello everybody does/will samba AD support t LAPS GPO ? https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/laps/laps-overview As far as I understand, this requires schema extension https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/laps/laps-technical-reference -- Arnaud FLORENT IRIS Technologies
2012 Aug 24
0
Schema modification with auxiliary class vs builtin class and vbscript
Hello The situation is the following : I've successfully created an auxiliary class with an attribute by following this method : http://semifershome.free.fr/semifer/index.php?2008/02/12/42-etendre-le-schema-active-directory-classes-attributs-et-display-specifiers The auxiliary class is "allowedService" and the attribute is "allowedServiceAttribute". The
2017 Sep 20
1
ACL by LDAP port 389/636
Hello Samba Team, We have AD controller with opened ldap ports (389/636). Problem is that users can connect by application like Apache DIrectory Studio and they see all ldap tree. Is it any solution to: - block view for all users without specific ACL, - block same attribute like uidNumber ? I'm lokking something like ACL in OpenLdap for Samba AD. Maybe somebody can help ? Best regards,
2019 Aug 07
2
best practice for domain admins
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 7 augustus 2019 13:53 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] best practice for domain admins > > Am 07.08.19 um 13:41 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > > Good one Norbert, > > > >
2007 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] Changing basic blocks
Yup, You are right. That exploded. I missed some lines in between. there was a .reserve(total) in the actual code. But, there is some side effect I still could not find. 2007/8/16, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Emílio Wuerges wrote: > > -- > > int total = BB->size(); > > std::vector<MachineInstr*>
2007 Aug 10
2
[LLVMdev] Changing basic blocks
For adding the nop: TII->insertNoop(*BB, BB->end()); 2007/8/9, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > > On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Emílio Wuerges wrote: > > I too believe it should not be complicated. > > But I was not being able to do it. > > Finally, after some thinking (and tinkering), this worked like a charm: > > > > MachineInstr* mi =
2007 Aug 09
4
[LLVMdev] Changing basic blocks
Hi Tanya and everybody, Ty for your support. I too believe it should not be complicated. But I was not being able to do it. For instance, I tried to run this code below: BB->push_back(&(BB->front())); BB->pop_front(); But it did not work (kinda obvious why). Nor this: BB->push_back(BB->begin()); BB->pop_front(); But also did not work. It seams the same
2007 Aug 08
2
[LLVMdev] Changing basic blocks
Hello guys, I plan to do some pre register allocation optimizations. I already know my way around LLVM but I could use some more experience. I need a way to reorder instructions inside MachineBasicBlocks or MachineFunctions. I've been searching for it but I have not found an example in the code yet. Can someone point me where I should look for? ty, -- Emilio Wuerges LAPS - Laboratorio
2010 Dec 05
0
Extending Samba4 schema
Hi, Following on from 'http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2010-November/074786.html' thread, I have come across another problem. I have been playing with Samba4 and Zarafa integration. I have managed to extend most of attributes with exception of few. Samba4 ldb seems to crash when importing the following type of attribute: dn: CN=Zarafa-Send-As,<SchemaContainerDN>
2023 May 05
1
6.2 still cannot get hdmi display out on Thinkpad P73 Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile/TU104
On Thu, 4 May 2023 16:32:16 -0700 Marc MERLIN <marc_nouveau at merlins.org> wrote: > Hi again, I just saw a bunch of commits from all of you (thanks), but > still can't find info if my thinkpad P73 with Quadro RTX 4000 > Mobile/TU104 is meant to be supported, or not, and if so, how I can > best report issues beyond what I've already sent. > > The intel graphics