similar to: Samba4 shares slow

Le 21/11/2018 à 10:13, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:34:45 +0100 > Julien TEHERY via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi there >> >> I set up a POC domain with multiple DCs, multiple remote sites and >> samba shares. This POC is a simulation of a whole samba3 domain >> migration. Users, and groups have been

On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:34:45 +0100 Julien TEHERY via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi there > > I set up a POC domain with multiple DCs, multiple remote sites and > samba shares. This POC is a simulation of a whole samba3 domain > migration. Users, and groups have been imported from the older domain > to the new one. > > Here's the setup: >

I have a classic NT4 domain with the PDC also the wins server. With the recent ransomware problem, we're trying to remove SMB1 and below protocols. However when I do this, the browse list is gone. Hosts can access properly the shares, but they have to know exactly \\machine\share in order to to connect. The same thing from a linux client: smbclient -L {PDC} -m SMB2 Domain=[{MYDOMAIN}]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:34:40 +0100 Julien TEHERY via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> DC1 (RHEL7 - samba 4.6.4) > > Where did you get the Samba 4.6.4 packages from, they cannot be the > > standard RHEL7 ones, as you cannot provision an AD DC using the > > standard RHEL Samba packages. > > > That's right, they have been compiled from source

Hi all, Quick question - does Samba server still support Unix extensions when connecting over SMB3? My Linux client recently got upgraded to a CIFS module version that uses SMB3 by default, and since then I lost the ability to create symlinks on my CIFS shares. Running "mount" shows the share mounted with the "nounix" option. If I follow the advice in dmesg and add the

Hai, ... > > As I said, where is the fault, is it something that Windows 10 is or > isn't doing, or is it Samba ? > > Well, we cannot change Windows, so on that basis, I think you should > make a Samba bug report and let it work through the system. > > Rowland Well, yes, we can change windows, by allowing/disallowing SMB1. Which might help in detecting whats

Hi there Le 12/04/2019 à 09:57, Marco Gaiarin via samba a écrit : > Mandi! Vex Mage via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >> I've spun up a Samba4 server and set it up as an active directory domain >> controller and I can definitely see that this is a very robust system and >> is working well however; I don't see a management solution to >>

We have a 10G network with a mix of Windows 10 and MacOS 10.12 machines, and a CentOS 7 machine. Copying large files "fast" from the CentOS machine to Windows, using SMB2 or SMB3 fails almost every time, at the end of the copy. - With SMB1, it seems to work, but is much slower. - Copying to a smb share on a Mac seems to work, but is also much slower. - Using a normal Gigabit network

Hi Team, Workaround for CVE-2017-12151 :- client max protocol = NT1 and CVE-2017-12163 :- server min protocol = SMB2_02 are contradicting to each other. CVE-2017-12151 impacts on SMB3 protocol but workaound suggst to use NT1. I have below queries regarding this. Is SMB2 protocol also impacted by CVE-2017-12151 ? Can i use client max protocol = SMB2 so that it does not contradict with

Hello, I'm using asterisk 1.0.7. with a somewhat advanced setup with IAX and CAPI as channels. A call comes in via IAX2 and should be redirected to CAPI. So I wrote the following dialplan: [fromiax] exten => _8XXX,1,Answer exten => _8XXX,2,Dial(CAPI/265:B${EXTEN:1},,r) [fromcapi] exten => 265,1,Answer exten => 265,2,Dial(IAX2/PoC/11@from-lw) exten => 265-BUSY,1,Busy exten

Hello, I currently run samba with server min protocol = NT1 but I need to move towards server min protocol = SMB2 is there any way I can detect which clients still use the older protocol versions? I would like to estimate the impact of the change before i do close NT1/SMB1. Thank and kind regards, Heiner Billich

Hi Folks, I'm trying to debug an issue that I've found while attempting to qualify GlusterFS for potential distributed storage projects on the FreeBSD-11.1 server platform - using the existing package of GlusterFS v3.11.1_4 The main issue I've encountered is that I cannot add new bricks while setting/increasing the replica count. If I create a replicated volume "poc"

Hi All, I am a newbie in Ruby-Rails. Actually we are using postgre SQL and Ruby application to access the DB. I have made the controller and the model classes. My database.yml contains: development: adapter: postgresql database: test username: poc password: poc host: localhost:5000 test: adapter: postgresql database: test username: poc password: poc host: localhost:5000

Hi everyone, Steve and Jeremy gave a great talk at SambaXP on SMB3 with Posix extensions. The death of SMB1 gets nearer ! I was wondering what is the minimum Samba version and minimum Linux kernel version in order to get that support. Cheers, Denis -- Denis Cardon Tranquil IT 12 avenue Jules Verne (Bat. A) 44230 Saint S?bastien sur Loire (FRANCE) tel : +33 (0) 240 975 755

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:06 PM Mark Staudinger <mark.staudinger at nyi.net> wrote: > Hi Folks, > I'm trying to debug an issue that I've found while attempting to qualify > GlusterFS for potential distributed storage projects on the FreeBSD-11.1 > server platform - using the existing package of GlusterFS v3.11.1_4 > The main issue I've encountered is that I

Hmm… I see that there is a patch in the bugzilla page for that bug. I guess I could try that one… :-) I notice in the patch that there is a lot of talk about SMB2 - we use SMB3 mostly now. But perhaps there is some code sharing? Or perhaps SMB2 is used when talking to the AD servers? Or the few SMB2-talking clients causes the problem for all of the other users? When testing the “timeout” issue I

Hi all, Behavior described in this email is identical whether I try to mount at 192.168.100.2, my desktop and location of my Samba server, or 192.168.100.239, my laptop that is remote from my desktop with Samba server... I want to mount a share defined on my Linux desktop, on my Linux laptop, as a better alternative than sshfs or NFS. I want this mount to happen as version 2.x or 3.x, not as

Sorry for a rather 'unifornative' subject, but i've little o no clue on this. I'm using at work 'pam_mount' with a rather standard configuration to mount via CIFS/SMB user's home directory, from a samba AD member server. This configuration is a bit 'old' (mint sonya, AKA Ubuntu 16.04 as a client, so samba 4.3; debian and samba 4.8 as a server), but work

HI to all! My Name is Juan Franco. I'm from Argentina, I work in a big gubernamental organization and we are migrating our deprecated (smb3 + Ldap + NT4) to Samba 4 AD DC: But I have some issues with newer versions. if I install a version newer to 4.9.x. Windows XP can't join the domain. The error message is ".. No *more connections can* be *made* to this remote computer at this

Il giorno lun, 08/09/2014 alle 20.03 +0100, James Hogarth ha scritto: > On 8 Sep 2014 17:00, "Frantisek Hanzlik" <franta at hanzlici.cz> wrote > ... > > > > Hi James, thanks for reply. It seems as at SerNet's site have > > packages > > for RHEL6/Centos6 only, not for RHEL7/Centos7 or any Fedora > > versions, > > at least this. >