similar to: UID size, samba and kernel version

Hi everyone, we plan on setting up a Samba 4.x based AD. We have a couple of ancient to old systems running samba 3.0.24 to 3.5.7 and 3.6.24. Is there any problem to integrate those old systems as member of a Samba 4-driven AD? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:31:16 +0100 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:03:33 +0000 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:41:06 +0100 > > Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, but getent and id return with

Hello, I have an old 3.6 server to be replaced with a new 4.9 one. They are standalone, using tdbsam backend. I copied system users and group, then /var/lib/samba/*.tdb from the old to the new one. However, obviously the newer samba absolutely doesn't care about my old user database. "pdbedit -L" returns nothing on the new server. Is there some upgrade step I'm missing here?

Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:10:36 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > idmap config *:backend = tdb > idmap config *:range = 2000-9999 > idmap config SAMDOM : backend = rid > idmap config SAMDOM : range = 10000-999999 > You mean TESTAD instead of SAMDOM, don't you? --

Actually it isn't part of AD at all. We are using FreeIPA and Samba. We just finally figured this out with the help of some folks at Red Hat. It turned out there was a bug in one of the libraries that came along with sssd (sssd-libwbclient I believe). Their suggestion to use winbind and the version of the same library that came with it seems to have solved our problem instantly. It

Hai, Ok, so you have 3 the same machines and only one is slow. Thats important info. Did anything special happen with this server. For example 2 servers got a new install and this one had an upgrade (or sort of upgrade) from the "old" server? Or you configured the new server in an other (ad site) and moved it to the new location. In tring to figure out, where what happend, so we

Le Thu, 8 Oct 2020 13:09:37 -0300 Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> ?crivait: > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:20 PM Emmanuel Florac via samba < > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I have an old 3.6 server to be replaced with a new 4.9 one. They are > > standalone, using tdbsam backend. > > > > I copied

Le Fri, 9 Oct 2020 13:02:22 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> ?crivait: > Restart smbd and winbind and see how you go on. > No dice. I've edited the smb.conf, stopped the services, copied the old tdb again (account_policy.tdb group_mapping.tdb passdb.tdb registry.tdb secrets.tdb share_info.tdb winbindd_idmap.tdb); started the services and... #

Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 20:17:12 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > Only change I made before installing Samba, was to comment the > '127.0.1.1' line in /etc/hosts Tried again with your smb.conf and minimal changes, and it gets worse: [2017/02/20 14:42:19.048133, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:78(fault_report)

I've got a Debian/Jessie Samba 4.2.14 running as an AD member. ADC is a Windows2008R2 server. Join worked without problem. # net ads testjoin Join is OK wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g work perfectly and provides a list of users and groups from the AD as expected. wbinfo -i <user> works too: # wbinfo -i TESTAD\\testuser

Le Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:45:16 +0200 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > Am 28.08.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > These are your non-default lines: > > > > server signing = mandatory > > and i bet that one has the major performance impact > __________________________ > > quote from microsoft: >

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:41:06 +0100 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > > OK, but getent and id return with error (id: no such user, getent: > return code 2). On the systems I've previously set up similarly > (Wheezy/Samba 3.6), id and getent work. > Is this before or after you tried my proposed smb.conf ? > > > > > > I've found

Le Thu, 8 Oct 2020 18:31:38 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> ?crivait: > You do not normally run winbind on standalone server, so I think you > need to post the [global] portion of your old smb.conf, so we can > find out just what you are running. Here is the old one: [global] name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast passwd chat =

Hi everyone, I have the exact same problem as this: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772154 But the Samba version is different and much newer (Debian Wheezy 2:4.1.17+dfsg-1~bpo70+1). B asically many errors appear about non existing usershares. These fake usershares are just the user name, but truncated of the last character. process_usershare_file: stat of

Le Fri, 25 May 2018 16:55:04 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > > > > I don't understand either (or find in the documentation) how to > > disable these usershares. Any help and explanation appreciated. > > > > If you must use such an old EOL version of Samba, try what it says in > that Debian bugreport. A better

Le Thu, 8 Oct 2020 17:37:38 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> ?crivait: > On 08/10/2020 17:25, Emmanuel Florac via samba wrote: > > But it's not a domain, no LDAP, no AD. Just a standalone server, > > migrating to another standalone server. Should I do something using > > Samba tool? > > No, samba-tool is only used with AD. > >

Le Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:55:03 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > If you are going to upgrade, you might as well go for the highest > version you can, this will probably mean using Louis's packages. > > Samba is a rapidly changing program, a new minor version is released > every 6 months (approx) and the changes are significant. > >

Le Fri, 25 May 2018 19:01:53 +0200 Denis Cardon <dcardon at tranquil.it> écrivait: > It is not a bug per se, but I'd say it does not have the best default > parameter value. Try adding the following parameter in your [global] > section (the default value here is 100 on my Debian package) and > restart smbd: > > [global] > .... > usershare max shares = 0 >

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:13:39 +0100 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > > Both, alas. I'll retry by entering everything as you proposed instead > of editing the existing file. Please do, it should work > Here: >

Le Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:46:12 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > 4.2.x is EOL as far as Samba is concerned, there have been a lot of > changes since 4.2.* came out. > > Can I suggest you go here: http://apt.van-belle.nl/ > > You can get a much more recent version there, 4.6.7 OK I'll try it, but that doesn't really explain why