similar to: FSMO sieze syntax not working

Hello all, Have joined a new DC to an existing active directory consisting of a sole DC.  So, we now have two domain controllers, the original being ad.DOMAIN.intranet (192.168.0.17), and the new one being DOMAIN-ad.DOMAIN.intranet (192.168.0.11).  I want the new DC to become the FSMO role owner, so I followed the instructions here -

Hi! In wiki -> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles#Difference_of_Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles "If the DC is broken (e. g. hardware defect) and will never come back again, then you can seize the role on a remaining DC. It is very important that the old DC will never be connected to the network again, if it is connected again, this will cause

Alright... appreciate the info. Gave it a shot. Domain is still up but shares are down because they were hosted on FILER which has now been demoted and is no longer running any samba services. What I did while following the wiki "Transfer/Seize FSMO Roles": 1) logged on to FILER, ran samba-tool fsmo show, verified all 7 roles were owned by FILER. 2) logged on to CBADC01, executed

On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 20:39:25 +0000 Piers Kittel via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello all, > > Have joined a new DC to an existing active directory consisting of a > sole DC.  So, we now have two domain controllers, the original being > ad.DOMAIN.intranet (192.168.0.17), and the new one being > DOMAIN-ad.DOMAIN.intranet (192.168.0.11).  I want the new DC

So not the problem of using "seize" when both the OLD-FSMO server and NOVO-FSMo are active and on the network? The problem is to use "seize" if OLD-FSMO is not on the network and then come back? If I understood how it would be .... Regards; On 06-06-2018 15:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 15:35:29 -0300 > Carlos via samba <samba at

Thank you so far. But unfortunately I could not fix the problems. So I decided to start over again at a situation where all the fsmo roles resides on the old controller. Here is a transcript of what I did and the errors reported: The inititial position srv-kb-dc1:~ # samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SRV-KB-PRIMDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-Fi...

I've been thinking if it's better to make a new Samba 4 DC server instead upgrade the old DC and then transfer the FSMO roles to it and shut down the old server. This way the installation would be cleaner and free of any errors of the old installation. I'm using Samba 4.2.1 and the result of command below is: root at EMPRESA:~# samba-tool fsmo show InfrastructureMasterRole owner:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I lost my DC with all fsmo-roles. I try to "seize" the roles to another DC. It worked four out of five roles: root at SVL-V-AD1:~# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=rid Attempting transfer... Transfer unsuccessful, seizing... FSMO seize of 'rid' role successful root at SVL-V-AD1:~# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=pdc Attempting

But, if you use the "seizi" dc that no longer has the FSMO should be removed from the network, right? Regards; On 06-06-2018 11:36, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:24:33 -0300 > Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> The problem with this is that both Dcs will continue on the >> network ... I

Recently tried transferring roles from Samba 4.3.11 to Samba 4.7.0. Ultimately, both dcs agreed that the 4.7.0 dc (dc3) had all the roles and replication and the databases were in good shape. However, during the process, I got a lot of errors that seemed to magically disappear. Should I be worried? root at dc3:~# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS

I ran ldbsearch on my sam.ldb I searched for CBADC02, CBADC03, and TESTES (all VMs that fail to join domain), results are below: CBADC02 shows up a few times: # record 1906 dn: CN=CBADC02\0ADEL:de85228c-f92b-4d5d-9d6a-01c3f915dec9,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configu$ objectClass: top objectClass: server instanceType: 4 whenCreated: 20160310044543.0Z uSNCreated: 4215

After accidentally destroying my primary DC which held all of the FSMO roles, I am unable to show any roles, or sieze the naming role. I initialy tried to sieze --role=all, and it failed, but by doing them individually I was able to seize them all except for the naming role. Any suggestions on how to fix this? # samba-tool fsmo show -d 9 <removed generic debug info> pm_process()

Hi, i transfered the roles from DC2 to DC1: root at dc1:~# samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=all -U administrator This DC already has the 'rid' FSMO role This DC already has the 'pdc' FSMO role This DC already has the 'naming' FSMO role This DC already has the 'infrastructure' FSMO role This DC already has the 'schema' FSMO role This DC already has the

Hi, we're using Zentyal 3.4/Samba 4.1.6 on two machine for our AD domain. We have to test the domain in "pure" microsoft environment, because a third party storage system. So I added DC and DNS role to one of our windows 2008R2, and joined it to our domain. Everything's fine at this point. Then I wanted transfer the 5 FSMO role to windows. Every role transferred successfully,

Attempting to move FSMO roles from one SerNET Samba 4.5.4 DC to another, all roles transfered except the DNS related ones - those fail with an LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS [root at larkin28 ~]# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=LARKIN28,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=micore,DC=us InfrastructureMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS

Hi, ------------------------------------------------------------ root at samba4:~# samba-tool fsmo show InfrastructureMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SAMBA4,CN=Servers,CN=Primeiro-site-padrao,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=UDOPIAUI,DC=NET,DC=BR RidAllocationMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SAMBA4,CN=Servers,CN=Primeiro-site-padrao,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=UDOPIAUI,DC=NET,DC=BR

I just transferred all the FSMO roles from DC-MIGRATE to DC1: [root at dc1 ~]# samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=all FSMO transfer of 'rid' role successful FSMO transfer of 'pdc' role successful FSMO transfer of 'naming' role successful FSMO transfer of 'infrastructure' role successful FSMO transfer of 'schema' role successful I then double checked as

Sorry, I meant to include the command you sent in my last message, I had executed it while troubleshooting... :~$ sudo /usr/local/samba/bin/ldbsearch --cross-ncs -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(fsmoroleowner=*)' | grep 'dn:' | sed 's|dn: ||' CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cb,DC=cliffbells,DC=com CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=cb,DC=cliffbells,DC=com

On 12/01/2023 10:53, Thorsten Marquardt via samba wrote: > Thank you so far. But unfortunately I could not fix the problems. So I > decided to start over again at a situation where all the fsmo roles > resides on the old controller. > > Here is a transcript of what I did and the errors reported: > > The inititial position > > srv-kb-dc1:~ # samba-tool fsmo show >

sorry, samba version 4.5.0 Am Freitag, 30. September 2016 10:31 CEST, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> schrieb: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:20:27 +0200 > Heinz Hölzl via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > i transfered the roles from DC2 to DC1: > > > > root at dc1:~# samba-tool fsmo transfer