similar to: old bug with usershares of what?

sorry for opening this thread again, but it looks like there is some bug in samba usershares. I successfully reproduced this bug in OpenBSD and in Fedora. Steps to reproduce: 1) Use default samba config. 2) Add options: usershare max shares = 5 (or else number) usershare allow guests = Yes 3) create usershares directory (personally i use directory path from testparm -v) 4) create group usershare

> ср, 31 окт. 2018 г. в 14:51, Rowland Penny via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org>: > >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:41:45 +0300 >> Илья Коскин via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> > Hello! Please look at this log entry: >> > >> > [2018/10/30 15:26:04.013132, 0] >> >

root:usershare пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 14:44, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org >: > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 14:03:54 +0300 > Илья Коскин via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > sorry for opening this thread again, but it looks like there is some > > bug in samba usershares. > > I successfully reproduced this bug in OpenBSD and in Fedora.

On 03/07/2023 13:01, ???? ?????? via samba wrote: > hello everyone! > > I'm using samba on OpenBSD and there is unusual behavior in it! > > The problem is [homes] share, it erroneously map nobody as a home share > for guest user. > > I noticed this with upgrading from 4.15 to 4.17. > > Please have a look at this simple config: > > --- > >

oh sorry, of course i have a typo in 6. The user usershare dir depends on system where samba was build. For example in fedora it is /var/lib/samba/usershares, and in openbsd it is /var/samba/usershares. I am sure i am doing everything right. пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 19:10, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org >: > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:05:09 +0300 > Илья Коскин via samba

If you insist that it is the expected output, then we have a bug in all linux distributions. All of them! For example this is latest fedora: [kasak at kasakoff ~]$ smbclient -N -L localhost Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- print$ Disk Printer Drivers share Disk IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba 4.18.3) SMB1 disabled -- no

On 03/07/2023 14:11, ???? ?????? wrote: > If you insist that it is the expected output, then we have a bug in > all linux distributions. All of them! > For example this is latest fedora: > [kasak at kasakoff ~]$ smbclient -N -L localhost > > Sharename Type Comment > --------- ---- ------- > print$ Disk Printer Drivers > share

hello everyone! I'm using samba on OpenBSD and there is unusual behavior in it! The problem is [homes] share, it erroneously map nobody as a home share for guest user. I noticed this with upgrading from 4.15 to 4.17. Please have a look at this simple config: --- [global] map to guest = Bad User [homes] browseable = no writable = yes --- With this config I have this listing: -----

Hello, i' got some strange message in samb log file : Sep 9 15:04:10 samba smbd[1018]: [2013/09/09 15:04:10.621264, 0] param/loadparm.c:9114(process_usershare_file) Sep 9 15:04:10 samba smbd[1018]: process_usershare_file: stat of /var/lib/samba/usershares/blabla failed. Permission non accord?e But i havent usershares defined. Somebody could told me what could be the way to solve this

I have a samba server running on ubuntu 9.10 with windows (both Xp and vista) clients running quickbooks (accounting software). Quickbooks can connect to the samba server and get access to the data files with no problems, if the secretary uses quickbooks continuously there is never a problem the system works for hours on end. However if the secretary leaves the software running but doing nothing

Hello, I notice if I simply comment out a share or remove entirely. I receive errors such as theses. Is there a proper protocol to follow when removing a share? process_usershare_file: stat of /var/lib/samba/usershares/myshare failed. No such file or directory ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4366(process_usershare_file) process_usershare_file: stat of /var/lib/samba/usershares/myshare failed.

In syslog of my DC (2:4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u2~bpo8+1) i found sometime rows like: Mar 21 09:53:40 vdcsv1 smbd[22686]: [2018/03/21 09:53:40.826081, 0] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:3244(process_usershare_file) Mar 21 09:53:40 vdcsv1 smbd[22686]: process_usershare_file: stat of /var/lib/samba/usershares/sysvo failed. Permesso negato Mar 21 09:53:40 vdcsv1 smbd[22686]: [2018/03/21 09:53:40.831949,

Hi to all, I have Samba configured as domain member with winbind and kerberos, I can access all share but I have some problem with the home directories because it ask me for password. This is my smb.conf [global] workgroup = domain netbios name = Manufac server string = Server di rete comment = server di rete encrypt passwords = true realm =

Hi All, I have a computer which I recently took off the domain before shipping to HP for repair. I've now had it back and re-added it to the domain and it no-longer appears to be able to access the sysvol share (even using a domain admin login). I've seen this behaviour in one other machine but as it was just a test machine I ignored the problem. When I try to access the share I

I did have a "usershares" share when I first set the domain up. This has since been removed. The strange thing is that from my PC (which was the first to be added to the domain) and from this PC (which was the second) I can still see the share (and access it from my PC). Seems like there is some caching going on somewhere. Any idea how it can be cleared? John On 30/06/2015

Hi, I have an Ubuntu system with samba 4 that did work perfectly until this morning. Normal shares in smb.conf appeared as always, while user shares included with %U did not anymore. This is the global part of smb.conf: ? ? ? ? security = user ? ? ? ? username map = /etc/samba/smbusers ? ? ? ? include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%U ? ? ? ? include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%m ? There are then various

Hello. I was wondering if anybody could point me in the right direction of creating a cross-fade effect for Ajax.Updater. If you have an element that gets replaced by a new one with Ajax.Updater, how can we blend one into the other? Many thanks. Tench

We have a Ubuntu/Samba setup to serve Windows-XP users using Active Directory credentials. The application is a backup service using rsync from their workstations to the server. Ubuntu: 9.10, Samba: 3.4.0. The backups work fine, and individual users logged onto XP with AD credentials can see the contents of their shares on the server. However, we have been unable to configure Samba to allow

We have a mail filter ( CanIt, by Roaring Penguin, see http://www.roaringpenguin.com ) that is doing a very good job indeed of blocking spam and viruses. And I certainly get a lot from this list ... so much that without the use of CanIt, I would have already had to retire my email address, and possibly even our entire domain, to avoid the constant march of crap. But ... the list server keeps

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 14:03:54 +0300 Илья Коскин via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > sorry for opening this thread again, but it looks like there is some > bug in samba usershares. > I successfully reproduced this bug in OpenBSD and in Fedora. > > Steps to reproduce: > 1) Use default samba config. > 2) Add options: > usershare max shares = 5 (or else number)